Paper · 2026 · LWT

Carrageenan coatings enhance guava shelf life by modulating oxidative stress, antioxidant defenses, and cell wall integrity

Shaista Gull; Shaghef Ejaz; Sajid Ali; et al.

19
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The coating based on carrageenan gum (CRG) was applied on guava ( Psidium guajava ) fruits to improve their postharvest quality. The coated fruits were stored for 15 days at 20 ± 1 °C and 85 to 90% RH. CRG-based coating markedly reduced fresh weight loss and incidence of decay. On 15 th day, 1% CRG-coated fruits had 32.6% lower moisture loss and 16–35% lower decay in comparison with uncoated fruits. The rates of respiration and ethylene synthesis were similarly suppressed, with 1% CRG-coated fruits showing 32.9% lower respiration and ethylene rates of 11.73 μl kg -1 h -1 vs. 17.57 μl kg -1 h -1 in controls. CRG treatments moderated ripening, evidenced by slower increases in TSS (9.2% vs. 10% in controls) and sugar-acid ratio (16.04 vs. 25.75), and better retention of titratable acidity (0.57% vs. 0.39%). Oxidative stress markers were reduced in 1% CRG fruits, including malondialdehyde (0.053 mM kg -1 ) and H 2 O 2 (20.74 μM kg -1 ). Antioxidants (ascorbic acid 111.86 mg·100 g -1 , phenolics 297.61 mg kg -1 ) and structural components (protopectin 14.50 g kg -1 ) were better preserved, alongside higher antioxidant enzyme activities. Activities of the enzymes related to cell wall degradation were also suppressed. Overall, 1% CRG coatings effectively maintained fruit quality, delayed ripening, and enhanced shelf life, as supported by physiological, biochemical, and organoleptic evaluations. • Carrageenan coating doubled guava shelf life (from 5 to 12 days). • Weight loss reduced by ∼42% in coated fruits. • Firmness retention improved by ∼38% with coating. • Ascorbic acid preserved ∼28% more than control. • Antioxidant activity enhanced by ∼35% at day 12.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrageenan coating reduced guava fruit weight loss and decay incidence.

Treatment
CRG-based coatinge0
Outcome
fresh weight loss and incidence of decaye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CRG-based coating markedly reduced fresh weight loss and incidence of decay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At day 15, 1% carrageenan coating lowered guava moisture loss by 32.6% relative to uncoated fruit.

Treatment
1% CRG-coatede0
Outcome
moisture losse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
32.6%e0
Comparator
uncoated fruitse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“On 15 th day, 1% CRG-coated fruits had 32.6% lower moisture loss and 16–35% lower decay in comparison with uncoated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At day 15, 1% carrageenan coating lowered guava decay by 16–35% relative to uncoated fruit.

Treatment
1% CRG-coatede0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
16–35%e0
Comparator
uncoated fruitse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“On 15 th day, 1% CRG-coated fruits had 32.6% lower moisture loss and 16–35% lower decay in comparison with uncoated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1% coating reduced guava respiration by 32.9%.

Treatment
1% CRG-coatede0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
lowere0
Value
32.9%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“1% CRG-coated fruits showing 32.9% lower respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1% coating lowered guava ethylene production to 11.73 μl kg -1 h -1 versus 17.57 μl kg -1 h -1 in controls.

Outcome
ethylene ratese0
Value
11.73 μl kg -1 h -1e0
Qualifier
17.57 μl kg -1 h -1e0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentDirection

Verbatim

e0

“ethylene rates of 11.73 μl kg -1 h -1 vs. 17.57 μl kg -1 h -1 in controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating slowed increases in guava total soluble solids.

Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
slower increasese0
Value
9.2%e0
Qualifier
10%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“slower increases in TSS (9.2% vs. 10% in controls)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated fruit had a lower sugar-acid ratio than controls.

Outcome
sugar-acid ratioe0
Value
16.04e0
Qualifier
25.75e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“sugar-acid ratio (16.04 vs. 25.75)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating retained guava titratable acidity better than controls.

Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
better retentione0
Value
0.57%e0
Qualifier
0.39%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“better retention of titratable acidity (0.57% vs. 0.39%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating reduced guava malondialdehyde to 0.053 mM kg -1.

Treatment
1% CRGe0
Outcome
malondialdehydee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.053 mM kg -1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Oxidative stress markers were reduced in 1% CRG fruits, including malondialdehyde (0.053 mM kg -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating reduced guava hydrogen peroxide to 20.74 μM kg -1.

Treatment
1% CRGe0
Outcome
H 2 O 2e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20.74 μM kg -1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Oxidative stress markers were reduced in 1% CRG fruits, including malondialdehyde (0.053 mM kg -1 ) and H 2 O 2 (20.74 μM kg -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating preserved guava ascorbic acid at 111.86 mg·100 g -1.

Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
better preservede0
Value
111.86 mg·100 g -1e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidants (ascorbic acid 111.86 mg·100 g -1 , phenolics 297.61 mg kg -1 ) and structural components (protopectin 14.50 g kg -1 ) were better preserved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating preserved guava phenolics at 297.61 mg kg -1.

Outcome
phenolicse0
Direction
better preservede0
Value
297.61 mg kg -1e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidants (ascorbic acid 111.86 mg·100 g -1 , phenolics 297.61 mg kg -1 ) and structural components (protopectin 14.50 g kg -1 ) were better preserved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating preserved guava protopectin at 14.50 g kg -1.

Outcome
protopectine0
Direction
better preservede0
Value
14.50 g kg -1e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidants (ascorbic acid 111.86 mg·100 g -1 , phenolics 297.61 mg kg -1 ) and structural components (protopectin 14.50 g kg -1 ) were better preserved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating increased antioxidant enzyme activity and suppressed cell-wall-degrading enzyme activity.

Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“alongside higher antioxidant enzyme activities. Activities of the enzymes related to cell wall degradation were also suppressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrageenan coating extended guava shelf life from 5 to 12 days.

Treatment
Carrageenan coatinge0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
doublede0
Value
from 5 to 12 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carrageenan coating doubled guava shelf life (from 5 to 12 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrageenan coating reduced guava weight loss by approximately 42%.

Treatment
coatede0
Outcome
Weight losse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
∼42%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Weight loss reduced by ∼42% in coated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrageenan coating improved guava firmness retention by approximately 38%.

Treatment
coatinge0
Outcome
Firmness retentione0
Direction
improvede0
Value
∼38%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Firmness retention improved by ∼38% with coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrageenan coating preserved approximately 28% more guava ascorbic acid than control.

Outcome
Ascorbic acide0
Direction
moree0
Value
∼28%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“Ascorbic acid preserved ∼28% more than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrageenan coating enhanced guava antioxidant activity by approximately 35% at day 12.

Outcome
Antioxidant activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
∼35%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant activity enhanced by ∼35% at day 12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1678 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: postharvest · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 42 positive, 4 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.