Paper · 2026 · Agriculture

The Effect of Cutting Technique on the Degree of Damage to Fruit Tree Shoots

Tomasz Nowakowski; Karol Tucki; Łukasz Gruz

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of various fruit tree shoot cutting techniques and variable wood moisture content on the formation of damage on the cut surface, using fractal dimension analysis. The experiments were conducted on shoots of two cultivars of apple and pear trees, at four levels of moisture content and using three cutting units: a chainsaw, a circular saw, and bypass loppers. The obtained cross-sectional images were digitally processed, and the degree of damage was evaluated using the fractal dimension. Analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of shoot moisture content, plant species, and cutting tool type on the fractal dimension value, which represents the complexity of the cut edge. The best cutting quality was observed for shoots with the highest moisture content and those cut with a pair of loppers and a circular saw, whereas the greatest damage was caused by the chainsaw. Apple cultivars exhibited the lowest susceptibility to damage, while pear cultivars showed the highest. These findings confirm the crucial role of both cutting technique selection and material moisture in determining cutting quality, and the applied fractal analysis proved to be a useful tool for the objective assessment of damage. The obtained results contribute to the optimisation of tool selection and to the design of orchard machinery, especially in relation to the development of mechanical pruning systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture content significantly affected cut edge fractal dimension.

Taxon
apple and pear treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Treatment
shoot moisture contente0
Outcome
fractal dimension valuee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of shoot moisture content, plant species, and cutting tool type on the fractal dimension value, which represents the complexity of the cut edge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoots of two cultivars of apple and pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting tool type significantly affected cut edge fractal dimension.

Taxon
apple and pear treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Treatment
cutting tool typee0
Outcome
fractal dimension valuee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of shoot moisture content, plant species, and cutting tool type on the fractal dimension value, which represents the complexity of the cut edge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoots of two cultivars of apple and pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant species significantly affected cut edge fractal dimension.

Taxon
apple and pear treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Material
plant speciese0
Outcome
fractal dimension valuee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of shoot moisture content, plant species, and cutting tool type on the fractal dimension value, which represents the complexity of the cut edge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoots of two cultivars of apple and pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots with the highest moisture content had the best cutting quality.

Taxon
apple and pear treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
cutting qualitye0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
highest moisture contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best cutting quality was observed for shoots with the highest moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoots of two cultivars of apple and pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Loppers and a circular saw gave the best cutting quality.

Taxon
apple and pear treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Treatment
pair of loppers and a circular sawe0
Outcome
greatest damagee0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
chainsawe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those cut with a pair of loppers and a circular saw, whereas the greatest damage was caused by the chainsaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoots of two cultivars of apple and pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chainsaw cutting caused the greatest damage.

Taxon
apple and pear treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Treatment
chainsawe0
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the greatest damage was caused by the chainsaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoots of two cultivars of apple and pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple cultivars had the lowest susceptibility to cutting damage.

Material
Apple cultivarse0
Outcome
susceptibility to damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
pear cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apple cultivars exhibited the lowest susceptibility to damage, while pear cultivars showed the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1034 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pear cultivars had the highest susceptibility to cutting damage.

Material
pear cultivarse0
Outcome
susceptibility to damagee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Apple cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apple cultivars exhibited the lowest susceptibility to damage, while pear cultivars showed the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1034 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fractal analysis was useful for objective assessment of cut damage.

Taxon
apple and pear treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Outcome
objective assessment of damagee0
Value
useful toole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the applied fractal analysis proved to be a useful tool for the objective assessment of damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“shoots of two cultivars of apple and pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑