Paper · 2026 · Ecology and Evolution

Effects of the Irregular Shelterwood System on Regeneration Dynamics of Shorea robusta Gaertn. f. in Baijalpur Community Forest, Nepal

Sudhan Gaire; Sandesh Gharti; Rohit Bhusal; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Irregular Shelterwood System (ISS) has recently been introduced in Nepalese community forests to promote sustainable regeneration of Shorea robusta (Sal). However, limited research exists on its ecological impacts and regeneration dynamics. This study examined regeneration patterns, soil properties, and environmental factors influencing S. robusta regeneration under the ISS in Baijalpur Community Forest, Kapilvastu District, Nepal. Using a stratified systematic random sampling design, data were collected from treated and untreated plots. Results showed a significantly higher density of seedlings (16,800 ha −1 ) and saplings (4693 ha −1 ) in treated plots compared to untreated areas (11,960 and 2688 ha −1 , respectively), indicating the effectiveness of ISS in enhancing regeneration. Most regeneration originated from seedlings rather than coppice shoots. Soil assessments revealed slightly acidic to neutral sandy loam soils, with higher organic matter (OM) and improved nutrient profiles in treated plots. Crown cover and organic carbon were negatively correlated with regeneration, suggesting that moderate canopy openings favor S. robusta establishment. These findings underscore the ecological importance of adaptive silvicultural practices for improving regeneration success, forest resilience, and sustainable community forestry in Nepal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated plots had higher seedling density than untreated plots.

Taxon
Shorea robustaShorea robustat0
Treatment
treated plotse0
Outcome
density of seedlingse0
Direction
highere0
Value
16,800 ha −1e0
Qualifier
11,960 and 2688 ha −1e0
Comparator
untreated arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Shorea robusta
Shorea robusta · TaxonDelonix · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shorea robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results showed a significantly higher density of seedlings (16,800 ha −1 ) and saplings (4693 ha −1 ) in treated plots compared to untreated areas (11,960 and 2688 ha −1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated plots had higher sapling density than untreated plots.

Taxon
Shorea robustaShorea robustat0
Treatment
treated plotse0
Outcome
saplingse0
Direction
highere0
Value
4693 ha −1e0
Qualifier
11,960 and 2688 ha −1e0
Comparator
untreated arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Shorea robusta
Shorea robusta · TaxonDelonix · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shorea robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results showed a significantly higher density of seedlings (16,800 ha −1 ) and saplings (4693 ha −1 ) in treated plots compared to untreated areas (11,960 and 2688 ha −1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–742 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most regeneration came from seedlings rather than coppice shoots.

Taxon
Shorea robustaShorea robustat0
Outcome
regeneration originated from seedlings rather than coppice shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Shorea robusta
Shorea robusta · TaxonDelonix · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shorea robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Most regeneration originated from seedlings rather than coppice shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated plots had higher soil organic matter.

Taxon
Shorea robustaShorea robustat0
Treatment
treated plotse0
Outcome
organic mattere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Shorea robusta
Shorea robusta · TaxonDelonix · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shorea robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil assessments revealed slightly acidic to neutral sandy loam soils, with higher organic matter (OM) and improved nutrient profiles in treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated plots had improved soil nutrient profiles.

Taxon
Shorea robustaShorea robustat0
Treatment
treated plotse0
Outcome
nutrient profilese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Shorea robusta
Shorea robusta · TaxonDelonix · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shorea robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil assessments revealed slightly acidic to neutral sandy loam soils, with higher organic matter (OM) and improved nutrient profiles in treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1029 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regeneration was negatively correlated with crown cover.

Taxon
Shorea robustaShorea robustat0
Organ / stage
Crown covere0
Outcome
regeneratione0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Shorea robusta
Shorea robusta · TaxonDelonix · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shorea robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Crown cover and organic carbon were negatively correlated with regeneration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regeneration was negatively correlated with organic carbon.

Taxon
Shorea robustaShorea robustat0
Compound
organic carbone0
Outcome
regeneratione0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Shorea robusta
Shorea robusta · TaxonDelonix · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shorea robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Crown cover and organic carbon were negatively correlated with regeneration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1106 · show in text ↑