Paper · 2010 · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)

Temporal dynamic of 'Gala' leaf spot in apples under conventional and organic production systems Dinâmica temporal da mancha foliar da 'Gala' em macieiras conduzidas sob os sistemas de produção convencional e orgânico

Bogo, Amauri; de Jesus Junior W.C.; Casa, Ricardo Trezzi; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the temporal dynamic of 'Gala' leaf spot under conventional and organic systems of production in edafoclimatic conditions of Santa Catarina plateau. The incidence and severity were quantified biweekly in 100 leaves distributed in four branches of the "Royal Gala" cultivar with 12 replications, generating 16 maps for each system of production. The disease severity was evaluated in accordance with the specific diagrammatic scale. Curves of disease progress were made and the epidemics compared according to: a) the beginning of symptoms appearance (BSA); b) the time to reach the maximum disease intensity and severity (TRMDI and TRMDS); c) the maximum value of disease intensity and severity (I<inf>max</inf> and S<inf>max</inf>); and d) area under the incidence and severity disease progress curve (AUIPCI and AUSDPC). The incidence and severity data were analyzed by linear regression, adjusted for three empirical models, Logistic, Monomolecular and Gompertz. The 'Royal Gala' cultivar was susceptible to Colletotrichum spp. and the highest disease intensity was observed in the organic than in conventional system of production. The Logistic epidemiological model was the most appropriate to describe the disease progress curve and, there is no significant difference between systems when used only incidence value. The severity progress rate (r) was significantly higher in the organic than in the conventional system of production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Royal Gala was susceptible to Colletotrichum spp.

Taxon
Royal Galae0
Material
Royal Galae0
Interactor
Colletotrichum spp.Colletotrichume0pathogen
Outcome
susceptible to Colletotrichum spp.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum
Colletotrichum · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)David B. Langston, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'Royal Gala' cultivar was susceptible to Colletotrichum spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease intensity was higher in organic than conventional production.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
conventional system of productione0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest disease intensity was observed in the organic than in conventional system of production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1163 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Logistic model best described the disease progress curve.

Outcome
most appropriate to describe the disease progress curvee0
Comparator
Logistic epidemiological modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“The Logistic epidemiological model was the most appropriate to describe the disease progress curve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1263 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Incidence values alone showed no significant difference between production systems.

Outcome
incidence valuee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“there is no significant difference between systems when used only incidence value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Severity progress rate was significantly higher in organic than conventional production.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
severity progress rate (r)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional system of productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“The severity progress rate (r) was significantly higher in the organic than in the conventional system of production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1469 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.