Paper · 2016 · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)

Copper toxicity assessment in two soil natural with different pH bands - An approach to edaphic plants and organisms Toxicidade do cobre em função da correção do pH em dois solos naturais - Uma abordagem com plantas e organismos edáficos

Zortea T.; Testa M.; Silva, Antonio Waldimir Leopoldino Da; et al.

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The growing agricultural development has resulted in environmental problems of the generation of waste containing toxic elements and some inadequate agricultural practices can trigger copper (Cu) accumulation in the soil. The aim is to evaluate the effects of liming on copper toxicity, on the germination of plants and soil biota. Ecotoxicological tests of seed germination were performed, which were used species Avena sativa and Vicia villosa, and avoidance test organisms test species Enchytraeus crypticus, both tests were performed in Oxisol (LVd) and Entisol (RQo). The treatments consisted of increasing doses of copper sulfate (CuSO4), and 0; 10, 40, 80, 160 and 320 mg kg-1 in soil pH corrected and uncorrected. The seeds of exposure A. sativa and V. villosa to increasing doses of CuSO4 expressed no toxic effect on the germination rate (P> 0.05) in both soils, regardless of pH correction. Significant avoidance was observed for LVd on the first dose and evaluated for significant avoidance RQo was also observed, however, with a range of doses according to the pH adjustment. Thus contamination of different types of natural soil with CuSO4 does not affect seed germination rate A. sativa and V. villosa, but leakage was enchytraeids E. crypticus evaluated in both soils (LVD and RQo), indicating that earthworms are able to detect and prevent soil contaminated with Cu.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing copper sulfate doses did not significantly affect Avena sativa seed germination in either soil, regardless of pH correction.

Taxon
A. sativaAvena sativae0
Treatment
increasing doses of CuSO4e0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
no toxic effecte0
Setting
both soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seeds of exposure A. sativa and V. villosa to increasing doses of CuSO4 expressed no toxic effect on the germination rate (P> 0.05) in both soils, regardless of pH correction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing copper sulfate doses did not significantly affect Vicia villosa seed germination in either soil, regardless of pH correction.

Taxon
V. villosaVicia villosae0
Treatment
increasing doses of CuSO4e0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
no toxic effecte0
Setting
both soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seeds of exposure A. sativa and V. villosa to increasing doses of CuSO4 expressed no toxic effect on the germination rate (P> 0.05) in both soils, regardless of pH correction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–901 · show in text ↑

copper(II) sulfate · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.