Paper · 2026 · Smart Agricultural Technology

Assessing day and night UAV-based estimates of crop characterization using LiDAR

K. Colton Flynn; Gurjinder S. Baath; Bala Ram Sapkota; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Advancements among remote sensing technologies and platforms have provided opportunities to collect spatially continuous biophysical parameters for the benefit of precision agriculture. Specifically, unmanned aerial vehicles with mounted Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensors have promise in characterizing crop biophysical parameters, such as canopy height (CH) and leaf area index (LAI). This study aimed to demonstrate the assessment of CH and LAI using UAV LiDAR-based methodologies under varying light conditions (e.g. day or night). The methods incorporated the use of the cloth simulation filter (CSF) to assign ground/vegetation status of the LiDAR point cloud for CH calculations, and then further benefited from the inclusion of laser penetration and intensity-based LiDAR indices to estimate LAI. These methods were replicated with identical day and night flights for a multi-planting date (seven dates) corn experiments conducted in Temple, Texas. Findings suggest that both CH ( R 2 ≥0.91; RMSE ≤15.43) and LAI ( R 2 ≥0.77, RMSE =0.52) measurements are highly correlated when comparing in-situ and LiDAR-based measurements. When comparing between LiDAR data collected during day and night flights, CH showed very little difference (Δ R 2 ≤0.01) and were found to be highly replicable. LAI measures presented more differences (Δ R 2 ≤0.05) between the day and night collections that we attribute to leaf turgor due to the relatively minor differences among models. The findings within provide the foundation for future works aiming to incorporate day and/or night LiDAR-based precision agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAV LiDAR canopy height (CH) was highly correlated with in-situ measurements in corn (R2 at least 0.91, RMSE at most 15.43).

Outcome
CHe0
Value
R 2 ≥0.91; RMSE ≤15.43e0
Qualifier
highly correlatede0
Comparator
in-situe0
Setting
Temple, Texase1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both CH ( R 2 ≥0.91; RMSE ≤15.43) and LAI ( R 2 ≥0.77, RMSE =0.52) measurements are highly correlated when comparing in-situ and LiDAR-based measurements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1141 · show in text ↑
e1

“multi-planting date (seven dates) corn experiments conducted in Temple, Texas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–964 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAV LiDAR leaf area index (LAI) was highly correlated with in-situ measurements in corn (R2 at least 0.77, RMSE 0.52).

Outcome
LAIe0
Value
R 2 ≥0.77, RMSE =0.52e0
Qualifier
highly correlatede0
Comparator
in-situe0
Setting
Temple, Texase1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both CH ( R 2 ≥0.91; RMSE ≤15.43) and LAI ( R 2 ≥0.77, RMSE =0.52) measurements are highly correlated when comparing in-situ and LiDAR-based measurements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1141 · show in text ↑
e1

“multi-planting date (seven dates) corn experiments conducted in Temple, Texas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–964 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy height from day and night LiDAR flights differed very little (change in R2 at most 0.01) and was highly replicable.

Outcome
CHe0
Value
Δ R 2 ≤0.01e0
Qualifier
highly replicablee0
Comparator
day and night flightse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When comparing between LiDAR data collected during day and night flights, CH showed very little difference (Δ R 2 ≤0.01) and were found to be highly replicable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“multi-planting date (seven dates) corn experiments conducted in Temple, Texas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–964 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LAI from day and night LiDAR collections differed more than canopy height did (change in R2 at most 0.05).

Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
more differencese0
Value
Δ R 2 ≤0.05e0
Comparator
day and night collectionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAI measures presented more differences (Δ R 2 ≤0.05) between the day and night collections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1395 · show in text ↑
e1

“multi-planting date (seven dates) corn experiments conducted in Temple, Texas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–964 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the larger day-night differences in LAI to leaf turgor, given the relatively minor differences among models.

Outcome
more differencese0
Qualifier
leaf turgore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAI measures presented more differences (Δ R 2 ≤0.05) between the day and night collections that we attribute to leaf turgor due to the relatively minor differences among models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1481 · show in text ↑
e1

“multi-planting date (seven dates) corn experiments conducted in Temple, Texas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–964 · show in text ↑