Paper · 2026 · Frontiers in Plant Science

High nitrogen use efficiency in wheat is explained by a longer fast-increase period and adequate pre-anthesis nitrogen accumulation

Minglong Yu; Churong Liu; Hongrun Liu; et al.

11
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Nitrogen (N)-efficient wheat cultivars achieve higher grain yields with equivalent N fertilizer inputs, and the grain filling character largely determines grain weight (GW) in cereal crops. However, the relationship of grain filling traits and N responsiveness (N r ) in wheat has not been fully evaluated. Methods A two-year field experiment evaluated five wheat cultivars across varying N levels (0, 75, 150, and 225 kg N ha −1 ) to assess how grain filling traits and N-related characteristics influence N r . Results The results showed that N-responsiveness wheat cultivars exhibited higher grain yields and critical N supply, alongside lower chlorophyll degradation rates (CDR). The direct path coefficient of GW on yield was 0.478, which explained 85.2% of the yield variation and was negatively correlated with other yield components. Across the combinations of cultivar and N supply, the variation in GW was primarily driven by the duration of fast-increase period (T fast ), rather than by the duration of slow-increase period ( T slow ) and slight-increase period (T slight ). Furthermore, the sensitivity of T fast to N supply explained the N r of grain yield in wheat. Structural equation modeling showed that adequate pre-anthesis N accumulation was the dominant factor driving the extension of T fast in high N-responsiveness wheat cultivates, secondary to lower CDR, which ultimately resulted in the highest GW. In addition, prolonging T fast induced enhanced post-anthesis N translocation in wheat, which contributed to higher N use efficiency (NUE). Discussion Prolonging the T fast enhances N responsiveness in wheat grain yield, providing a novel framework for evaluating NUE. This finding also highlights the critical role of elevated N accumulation at anthesis under N fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-responsive wheat cultivars had higher grain yields.

Material
N-responsiveness wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-responsiveness wheat cultivars exhibited higher grain yields and critical N supply, alongside lower chlorophyll degradation rates (CDR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–695 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-responsive wheat cultivars had higher critical nitrogen supply.

Material
N-responsiveness wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
critical N supplye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-responsiveness wheat cultivars exhibited higher grain yields and critical N supply, alongside lower chlorophyll degradation rates (CDR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–695 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-responsive wheat cultivars had lower chlorophyll degradation rates.

Material
N-responsiveness wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
chlorophyll degradation rates (CDR)e0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-responsiveness wheat cultivars exhibited higher grain yields and critical N supply, alongside lower chlorophyll degradation rates (CDR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–695 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight had a direct path coefficient of 0.478 on yield and explained 85.2% of yield variation.

Organ / stage
GWe0
Outcome
yield variatione0
Value
85.2%e0
Qualifier
0.478e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The direct path coefficient of GW on yield was 0.478, which explained 85.2% of the yield variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight was negatively correlated with other yield components.

Outcome
GWe0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Comparator
other yield componentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GW on yield was 0.478, which explained 85.2% of the yield variation and was negatively correlated with other yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight variation was primarily driven by the duration of the fast-increase period.

Organ / stage
fast-increase period (T fast )e0
Outcome
variation in GWe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variation in GW was primarily driven by the duration of fast-increase period (T fast ), rather than by the duration of slow-increase period ( T slow ) and slight-increase period (T slight )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitivity of the fast-increase period to nitrogen supply explained nitrogen responsiveness of grain yield.

Treatment
N supplye0
Outcome
N r of grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sensitivity of T fast to N supply explained the N r of grain yield in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1192 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate pre-anthesis nitrogen accumulation was the dominant factor extending the fast-increase period in highly nitrogen-responsive cultivars.

Outcome
extension of T faste0
Qualifier
adequate pre-anthesis N accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adequate pre-anthesis N accumulation was the dominant factor driving the extension of T fast in high N-responsiveness wheat cultivates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1369 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Lower chlorophyll degradation was a secondary factor extending the fast-increase period.

Outcome
highest GWe0
Qualifier
lower CDRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“secondary to lower CDR, which ultimately resulted in the highest GW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer fast-increase period enhanced post-anthesis nitrogen translocation.

Outcome
post-anthesis N translocatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
prolonging T faste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prolonging T fast induced enhanced post-anthesis N translocation in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1526 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced post-anthesis nitrogen translocation contributed to higher nitrogen use efficiency.

Outcome
N use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
enhanced post-anthesis N translocatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced post-anthesis N translocation in wheat, which contributed to higher N use efficiency (NUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1578 · show in text ↑