Paper · 2026 · Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

State of the Antioxidant System and Photosynthetic Apparatus of Barley after Gamma-Irradiation at Different Growth Stages

O. A. Guseva; P. N. Tsygvintsev

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In this study investigated changes in antioxidant system and photosystem II (PSII) in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves after acute γ-radiation exposure at four growth stages. Growth stages: 4 leaves unfolded (Z 14) and 5 leaves unfolded (Z 15), 1st node detectable (Z 31), flag leaf sheath extending (Z 41) and 1/4 of inflorescence emerged (Z 53) according to the international phenological Zadox scale. Plants were irradiated with doses of 15, 30, 45, and 60 Gy at a rate of 16 Gy/h. The flavonoids content was observed as the plants grew, reaching maximum values at the stage Z 53; after γ-irradiation no changes in the content at the studied stages were detected. The MDA content at all growth stages varied within the control range. Proline content remained unchanged compared to control values 48 h post-irradiation. Chl a, Chl b, and carotenoids content did not differ from controls 72 h after irradiation at stages Z 14–Z 15, Z 31, and Z 41, however, at stage Z 53, a 36% decrease in pigments in studied doses range was observed. Photosystem II (PS II) proved to be quite resistant to the effects of acute γ-irradiation in the early stages (Z 14–Z 41), with the exception of the stage Z 53, where a decrease chlorophyll fluorescence was observed. The ascorbic acid (AsA) and reduced glutathione (GSH) content, and the total reducing activity index increased (p < 0.05) at stages Z 31, Z 41 and Z 53 after irradiation in the studied doses range relative to the control. Thus, during the first three days after γ-irradiation of barley plants in high doses, activation of the components of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle was noted.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavonoid content reached its maximum at stage Z 53 during growth.

Organ / stage
stage Z 53e0
Outcome
flavonoids contente0
Direction
reaching maximum valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flavonoids content was observed as the plants grew, reaching maximum values at the stage Z 53”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation did not change flavonoid content at the studied stages.

Treatment
γ-irradiatione0
Outcome
contente0
Direction
no changese0
Qualifier
studied stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after γ-irradiation no changes in the content at the studied stages were detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MDA content remained within the control range at all growth stages.

Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
within the control rangee0
Comparator
control rangee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The MDA content at all growth stages varied within the control range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content was unchanged 48 hours after irradiation relative to control.

Treatment
post-irradiatione0
Outcome
Proline contente0
Direction
remained unchangede0
Qualifier
48 he0
Comparator
control valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content remained unchanged compared to control values 48 h post-irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid contents did not differ from controls at early stages.

Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
Chl a, Chl b, and carotenoids contente0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
72 h after irradiation at stages Z 14–Z 15, Z 31, and Z 41e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chl a, Chl b, and carotenoids content did not differ from controls 72 h after irradiation at stages Z 14–Z 15, Z 31, and Z 41”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigments decreased by 36% after irradiation at stage Z 53.

Organ / stage
stage Z 53e0
Treatment
studied doses rangee0
Outcome
pigmentse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at stage Z 53, a 36% decrease in pigments in studied doses range was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosystem II was resistant to acute irradiation during stages Z 14 to Z 41.

Treatment
acute γ-irradiatione0
Outcome
Photosystem II (PS II)e0
Qualifier
early stages (Z 14–Z 41)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosystem II (PS II) proved to be quite resistant to the effects of acute γ-irradiation in the early stages (Z 14–Z 41)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll fluorescence decreased after irradiation at stage Z 53.

Organ / stage
stage Z 53e0
Outcome
chlorophyll fluorescencee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stage Z 53, where a decrease chlorophyll fluorescence was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid and reduced glutathione contents increased after irradiation at stages Z 31, Z 41 and Z 53.

Organ / stage
stages Z 31, Z 41 and Z 53e0
Treatment
irradiation in the studied doses rangee0
Outcome
ascorbic acid (AsA) and reduced glutathione (GSH) contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ascorbic acid (AsA) and reduced glutathione (GSH) content, and the total reducing activity index increased (p < 0.05) at stages Z 31, Z 41 and Z 53 after irradiation in the studied doses range relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total reducing activity increased after irradiation at stages Z 31, Z 41 and Z 53.

Organ / stage
stages Z 31, Z 41 and Z 53e0
Treatment
irradiation in the studied doses rangee0
Outcome
total reducing activity indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ascorbic acid (AsA) and reduced glutathione (GSH) content, and the total reducing activity index increased (p < 0.05) at stages Z 31, Z 41 and Z 53 after irradiation in the studied doses range relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑

radiation · physiology: pigments · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

radiation · quality: phytochemicals · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.