Paper · 2026 · Applied Food Research

A novel technique of nutrition for the growth of wheat by alkaline plasma-activated water (APAW)

Fatemeh Baharlounezhad; Mohammad Ali Mohammadi

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cold atmospheric plasma represents an emerging technology with promising applications in agriculture. Plasma-activated water (PAW), an environmentally friendly technology, typically exhibits acidic properties and has been widely reported to enhance plant germination and growth through the action of reactive species. However, the effects of plasma-activated water with alkaline characteristics remain completely unknown. This study investigated the effects of alkaline plasma-activated water (APAW), enriched with reactive species generated through plasma electrolysis, on soil pH optimization and the enhancement of wheat germination, growth, and spike birth. Germination was evaluated by soaking seeds in tap water (TW) and alkaline plasma-activated water (APAW). After 1 day of soaking, the average germination percentage, germination speed, and germination rate were significantly higher in samples treated with alkaline APAW compared to those TW. The average seed vigor index in the APAW group was higher than that in the TW group after 2 and 4 days of treatment. Compared to the hydrogen ion concentration, the influence percentage of hydrogen peroxide concentration and oxidation-reduction potential on root and shoot length was greater than that of nitrite and nitrate ion concentrations. Growth parameters, soil pH, and spike birth were evaluated across four samples: AC (seeds soaked and irrigated with tap water), AD (seeds soaked with tap water and irrigated with APAW), BE (seeds soaked with APAW and irrigated with tap water), and BF (seeds soaked and irrigated with APAW). Samples irrigated with APAW exhibited the highest growth rates and the greatest increase in soil pH. Notably, spike birth was observed exclusively in APAW-irrigated samples throughout the 100-day experimental period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One day of APAW soaking significantly increased wheat germination percentage, speed, and rate versus tap water.

Treatment
alkaline APAWe0
Outcome
average germination percentage, germination speed, and germination ratee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
After 1 day of soakinge0
Comparator
tap water (TW)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“After 1 day of soaking, the average germination percentage, germination speed, and germination rate were significantly higher in samples treated with alkaline APAW compared to those TW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“Germination was evaluated by soaking seeds in tap water (TW) and alkaline plasma-activated water (APAW).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APAW soaking raised wheat seed vigor index after 2 and 4 days versus tap water.

Treatment
APAWe0
Outcome
average seed vigor indexe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
after 2 and 4 days of treatmente0
Comparator
TWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average seed vigor index in the APAW group was higher than that in the TW group after 2 and 4 days of treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1069 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide concentration and redox potential had greater influence on wheat root and shoot length than nitrite and nitrate concentrations.

Compound
hydrogen peroxidee0
Outcome
root and shoot lengthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
nitrite and nitrate ion concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“the influence percentage of hydrogen peroxide concentration and oxidation-reduction potential on root and shoot length was greater than that of nitrite and nitrate ion concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APAW irrigation produced the highest wheat growth rates.

Treatment
APAWe0
Outcome
growth ratese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Samples irrigated with APAW exhibited the highest growth rates and the greatest increase in soil pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APAW irrigation produced the greatest increase in soil pH in wheat cultivation samples.

Treatment
APAWe0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Samples irrigated with APAW exhibited the highest growth rates and the greatest increase in soil pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat spike birth occurred exclusively in APAW-irrigated samples during 100 days.

Treatment
APAW-irrigatede0
Outcome
spike birth was observed exclusivelye0
Qualifier
100-day experimental periode0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“spike birth was observed exclusively in APAW-irrigated samples throughout the 100-day experimental period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1805 · show in text ↑

physical treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

alkalinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 5 positive, 11 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.