Paper · 2026 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Field-grown hemp treated with humic/fulvic acids and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for phytomanaging a metal-contaminated agricultural soil

Felix Ofori-Agyemang; Nadège Oustrière; Christophe Waterlot; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Industrial hemp offers several advantages for phytomanaging metal(loid)-contaminated soils as it can provide valuable biomass notably for bioenergy while accumulating some metals (i.e., Cd and Zn) in its shoots. In a previous pot study humic/fulvic acids (HFA) incorporated into the soil with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) enhanced hemp growth. This study assessed the biostimulant effect of HFA, alone or paired with AMF (HFAxAMF), on the shoot yield and shoot Cd, Pb and Zn uptakes in a 2-year field trial in view of producing clean, renewable liquid biofuels. The trial (0.07 ha) was carried out at a contaminated agricultural field in a randomized split-plot design (nine blocks). Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1. Effects of HFA and HFAxAMF treatments on the behavior of metals and plants were compared to an unamended one. Hemp produced on average 10.7 (year 1)–14.5 (year 2) t DW ha−1 despite a severe drought in year 1. Neither HFA nor HFAxAMF treatments enhanced shoot yield. Shoot Cd, Pb and Zn uptakes reached 9.9, 230, and 869 g ha−1 year−1, respectively. In year 2, shoot Cd uptake improved under all treatments and the 0.01 M Ca(NO3)2-extractable soil Cd, Pb and Zn concentrations at harvest decreased by 95, 79 and 96%, respectively. Hemp was a relevant plant species for phytomanaging this metal-contaminated soil under current climatic constraints. The potential bioethanol yield was estimated in the 3851–6481 L ha−1 range. Overall, hemp can simultaneously reduce soil metal availability while producing a biomass convertible into liquid biofuels. This highlights its strong potential as a dual-purpose crop for sustainable and progressive phytoremediation and renewable energy production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp produced on average 10.7 to 14.5 t DW per ha over two years despite a severe drought in year 1.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Outcome
produced on averagee1
Value
10.7 (year 1)–14.5 (year 2) t DW ha−1e1
Qualifier
despite a severe drought in year 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–753 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hemp produced on average 10.7 (year 1)–14.5 (year 2) t DW ha−1 despite a severe drought in year 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HFA treatment did not enhance hemp shoot yield compared with the unamended control.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
HFAe2
Outcome
shoot yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
unamended onee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–753 · show in text ↑
e2

“Neither HFA nor HFAxAMF treatments enhanced shoot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1019 · show in text ↑
e3

“Effects of HFA and HFAxAMF treatments on the behavior of metals and plants were compared to an unamended one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HFA combined with AMF did not enhance hemp shoot yield compared with the unamended control.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
HFAxAMFe2
Outcome
shoot yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
unamended onee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–753 · show in text ↑
e2

“Neither HFA nor HFAxAMF treatments enhanced shoot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1019 · show in text ↑
e3

“Effects of HFA and HFAxAMF treatments on the behavior of metals and plants were compared to an unamended one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–863 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp shoot Cd uptake was 9.9 g per ha per year.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Outcome
Shoot Cd, Pb and Zn uptakese4
Value
9.9e4
Qualifier
g ha−1 year−1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–753 · show in text ↑
e4

“Shoot Cd, Pb and Zn uptakes reached 9.9, 230, and 869 g ha−1 year−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp shoot Pb uptake was 230 g per ha per year.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Outcome
Shoot Cd, Pb and Zn uptakese4
Value
230e4
Qualifier
g ha−1 year−1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–753 · show in text ↑
e4

“Shoot Cd, Pb and Zn uptakes reached 9.9, 230, and 869 g ha−1 year−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp shoot Zn uptake was 869 g per ha per year.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Outcome
Shoot Cd, Pb and Zn uptakese4
Value
869e4
Qualifier
g ha−1 year−1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–753 · show in text ↑
e4

“Shoot Cd, Pb and Zn uptakes reached 9.9, 230, and 869 g ha−1 year−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In year 2, shoot Cd uptake of hemp improved under all treatments.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
all treatmentse5
Outcome
shoot Cd uptakee5
Direction
improvede5
Qualifier
In year 2e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–753 · show in text ↑
e5

“In year 2, shoot Cd uptake improved under all treatments and the 0.01 M Ca(NO3)2-extractable soil Cd, Pb and Zn concentrations at harvest decreased by 95, 79 and 96%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1283 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.01 M Ca(NO3)2-extractable soil Cd concentration at harvest decreased by 95%.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Outcome
0.01 M Ca(NO3)2-extractable soil Cd, Pb and Zn concentrationse5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
95e5
Qualifier
at harveste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–753 · show in text ↑
e5

“In year 2, shoot Cd uptake improved under all treatments and the 0.01 M Ca(NO3)2-extractable soil Cd, Pb and Zn concentrations at harvest decreased by 95, 79 and 96%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1283 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.01 M Ca(NO3)2-extractable soil Pb concentration at harvest decreased by 79%.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Outcome
0.01 M Ca(NO3)2-extractable soil Cd, Pb and Zn concentrationse5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
79e5
Qualifier
at harveste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–753 · show in text ↑
e5

“In year 2, shoot Cd uptake improved under all treatments and the 0.01 M Ca(NO3)2-extractable soil Cd, Pb and Zn concentrations at harvest decreased by 95, 79 and 96%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1283 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.01 M Ca(NO3)2-extractable soil Zn concentration at harvest decreased by 96%.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Outcome
0.01 M Ca(NO3)2-extractable soil Cd, Pb and Zn concentrationse5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
96e5
Qualifier
at harveste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–753 · show in text ↑
e5

“In year 2, shoot Cd uptake improved under all treatments and the 0.01 M Ca(NO3)2-extractable soil Cd, Pb and Zn concentrations at harvest decreased by 95, 79 and 96%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1283 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider hemp a relevant species for phytomanaging this metal-contaminated soil under current climatic constraints.

Outcome
phytomanaging this metal-contaminated soile6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Hemp was a relevant plant species for phytomanaging this metal-contaminated soil under current climatic constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1400 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The potential bioethanol yield of the hemp biomass was estimated at 3851–6481 L per ha.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Outcome
The potential bioethanol yielde7
Value
3851–6481 L ha−1e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis sativa L. was sown at a density of 173 000 plants ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–753 · show in text ↑
e7

“The potential bioethanol yield was estimated in the 3851–6481 L ha−1 range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1476 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.