Paper · 2026 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Root architectural traits as phenotypic markers of aluminum tolerance in wheat

Márcio Renan Weber Schorr; Anderson César Ramos Marques; Júlia Gomes Farias; et al.

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Aluminum (Al 3+ ) toxicity is a major constraint to wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) productivity in acidic soils, where it restricts root growth and impairs nutrient and water uptake. Characterizing root system architecture (RSA) offers an effective approach for early screening of genotypes capable of maintaining growth under Al 3+ stress. This work aimed (i) to evaluate the effects of increasing Al 3 + concentrations on shoot development and RSA in wheat cultivars and (ii) to identify root traits that serve as reliable indicators of Al 3 + tolerance. Four cultivars, Anahuac, IAC‐5, Onix, and Quartzo, were grown in a greenhouse for 15 days under increasing concentrations of Al 3+ (0, 37.5, 75, and 150 µM). The cv. IAC‐5 presented the highest tolerance to Al 3+ , verified by the maintenance of shoot dry weight and foliar area, nearly twice the average of the other cultivars and reductions of only 1.4% and 13.9%, respectively, at 150 µM Al 3+ compared to 0 µM Al 3+ . Anahuac and Quartzo showed pronounced reductions in shoot and root growth (approximately 50%), with Anahuac being the most sensitive. Increasing Al 3+ concentrations reduced total root length, number of forks, and the proportion of thin roots while increasing average root diameter; root thickening was particularly evident in Al‐sensitive cultivars and in first‐ and second‐order lateral roots. Al 3+ tolerance was associated with sustained root emission and elongation, especially lateral roots during early vegetative state. Overall, RSA characterization, particularly root length, diameter, and branching traits, provides an efficient and rapid phenotyping strategy for selecting Al 3+ ‐tolerant wheat genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAC‐5 had the highest Al tolerance among cultivars.

Material
IAC‐5e0
Outcome
tolerance to Al 3+e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cv. IAC‐5 presented the highest tolerance to Al 3+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAC‐5 shoot dry weight declined only 1.4% at 150 µM versus 0 µM Al.

Material
IAC‐5e1
Treatment
150 µM Al 3+e0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
reductionse0
Value
1.4%e0
Comparator
0 µM Al 3+e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reductions of only 1.4% and 13.9%, respectively, at 150 µM Al 3+ compared to 0 µM Al 3+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cv. IAC‐5 presented the highest tolerance to Al 3+ , verified by the maintenance of shoot dry weight and foliar area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAC‐5 foliar area declined only 13.9% at 150 µM versus 0 µM Al.

Material
IAC‐5e1
Treatment
150 µM Al 3+e0
Outcome
foliar areae1
Direction
reductionse0
Value
13.9%e0
Comparator
0 µM Al 3+e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reductions of only 1.4% and 13.9%, respectively, at 150 µM Al 3+ compared to 0 µM Al 3+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cv. IAC‐5 presented the highest tolerance to Al 3+ , verified by the maintenance of shoot dry weight and foliar area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anahuac shoot and root growth declined approximately 50%.

Material
Anahuace0
Treatment
Al 3+e1
Outcome
shoot and root growthe0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
approximately 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anahuac and Quartzo showed pronounced reductions in shoot and root growth (approximately 50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“cv. IAC‐5 presented the highest tolerance to Al 3+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quartzo shoot and root growth declined approximately 50%.

Material
Quartzoe0
Treatment
Al 3+e1
Outcome
shoot and root growthe0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
approximately 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anahuac and Quartzo showed pronounced reductions in shoot and root growth (approximately 50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“cv. IAC‐5 presented the highest tolerance to Al 3+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anahuac was the most Al sensitive cultivar.

Material
Anahuace0
Outcome
most sensitivee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anahuac being the most sensitive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rising Al concentrations reduced total root length, forks and thin-root proportion.

Treatment
Increasing Al 3+ concentrationse0
Outcome
total root length, number of forks, and the proportion of thin rootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing Al 3+ concentrations reduced total root length, number of forks, and the proportion of thin roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rising Al concentrations increased average root diameter.

Treatment
Al 3+e1
Outcome
average root diametere0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while increasing average root diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing Al 3+ concentrations reduced total root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root thickening was strongest in sensitive cultivars and first- and second-order laterals.

Outcome
root thickeninge0
Qualifier
Al‐sensitive cultivars and in first‐ and second‐order lateral rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root thickening was particularly evident in Al‐sensitive cultivars and in first‐ and second‐order lateral roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al tolerance was associated with sustained root emission and elongation, especially lateral roots.

Organ / stage
lateral rootse0
Outcome
Al 3+ tolerancee0
Qualifier
sustained root emission and elongatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Al 3+ tolerance was associated with sustained root emission and elongation, especially lateral roots during early vegetative state”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RSA traits provide rapid phenotyping for Al-tolerant wheat genotypes.

Outcome
efficient and rapid phenotyping strategye0
Comparator
root length, diameter, and branching traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RSA characterization, particularly root length, diameter, and branching traits, provides an efficient and rapid phenotyping strategy for selecting Al 3+ ‐tolerant wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1702 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 13 positive, 54 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.