Paper · 2026 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Nano-Titanium-Chitosan Beads as a Biofungicidal Strategy against Anthracnose Stalk Rot in Maize

Nimra Iqbal; Amna Shoaib; Aneela Anwar; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

using alginate beads loaded with titanium nanoparticles (TiNPs) and chitosan nanoparticles (ChNPs). Encapsulation altered nanoparticle properties, as confirmed by UV-vis absorption at 210-270 nm, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) cross-linking signals. ζ-Potential and particle size distribution measurements indicated aggregation tendency of TiNPs, uniform dispersion of ChNPs, and heterogeneous surface charge-size in composite beads. Nanoparticle beads were spherical (4.5-5.2 nm), while composite were ellipsoidal (4.76 nm). ChNPs beads exhibited superior hydration, mass stability, and 81% antifungal activity, whereas composite beads showed 64% inhibition. Complete disease control was achieved in maize plants treated with beads of either ChNPs or TiNPs + ChNPs, accompanied by significant improvement in the plant performance attributes, both outperforming chemical fungicides. This research highlights nanoparticle-based alginate beads as a scalable, eco-friendly biofungicidal solution for agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ChNP beads had 81% antifungal activity.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
antifungal activitye0
Direction
superiore0
Value
81%e0
Comparator
composite beadse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ChNPs beads exhibited superior hydration, mass stability, and 81% antifungal activity, whereas composite beads showed 64% inhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Composite beads had 64% inhibition.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Value
64%e0
Comparator
ChNPs beadse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ChNPs beads exhibited superior hydration, mass stability, and 81% antifungal activity, whereas composite beads showed 64% inhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ChNPs beads achieved complete disease control in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
ChNPse0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
Completee0
Comparator
chemical fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Complete disease control was achieved in maize plants treated with beads of either ChNPs or TiNPs + ChNPs, accompanied by significant improvement in the plant performance attributes, both outperforming chemical fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiNPs + ChNPs beads achieved complete disease control in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
TiNPs + ChNPse0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
Completee0
Comparator
chemical fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Complete disease control was achieved in maize plants treated with beads of either ChNPs or TiNPs + ChNPs, accompanied by significant improvement in the plant performance attributes, both outperforming chemical fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ChNPs beads significantly improved maize performance attributes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
ChNPse0
Outcome
plant performance attributese0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
chemical fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Complete disease control was achieved in maize plants treated with beads of either ChNPs or TiNPs + ChNPs, accompanied by significant improvement in the plant performance attributes, both outperforming chemical fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiNPs + ChNPs beads significantly improved maize performance attributes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
TiNPs + ChNPse0
Outcome
plant performance attributese0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
chemical fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Complete disease control was achieved in maize plants treated with beads of either ChNPs or TiNPs + ChNPs, accompanied by significant improvement in the plant performance attributes, both outperforming chemical fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑

chitosan · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

titanium atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

233 papers: 215 positive, 18 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

229 papers more in this group

See all 233 papers →

nanoparticle · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.