Abstract
The aim of the research was to find out the effects of bacteria inoculation, four different nitrogen (0, 20, 40, 60 �kg �ha-1 �N) and four different phosphorus doses (0, 40, 60, 80 kg ha-1 P2O5) on field bean in Van-Turkey ecological condition. Although the effects of the applications showed differences depending on years, nitrogen application exerted a significant and positive effect on pod number, grain yield and raw protein proportion, whereas no significant effect was seen on seed number per pod and weight of thousand seeds. As for the effects of phosphorous doses, they weren’t found to be significant for all of the factors. On the other hand, bacteria inoculation exerted a significant and positive effect on pod number per plant and grain yield, whereas no effect of this application was seen on weight of thousand seeds and raw protein rate. Özet Araştırma bakteriaşılamasının, dört farklı nitrojen (0, 20, 40, 60 kg ha -1 N)ve dört farklı fosfor dozunun (0, 40, 60, 80 kg ha -1 P2O5 )Van-Türkiye ekolojik koşullarında Şeker fasulyesi (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) çeşidinde verim ve verim öğeleri üzerineetkisini belirlemek amacı ile yapılmıştır. Uygulamaların etkileri yıllaragöre farklılık gösterse de azot uygulaması bakla sayısı, taneverimi üzerinde önemli ve olumlu etki yapmıştır ve ham protein oranı, baklabaşına tohum sayısı ve bin tohum ağırlığı üzerinde önemli bir etkigörülmemiştir. Fosfor dozlarının etkilerine gelince, tüm faktörler içinönemli bulunmadı. Diğer taraftan bakteri aşılaması bitki başına baklasayısı ve tane verimi üzerinde önemli ve olumlu bir etki yaratırken,bu uygulamanın bin tane ağırlığı ve ham protein oranı üzerinde herhangi biretkisi görülmemiştir.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
nitrogen application had positive on pod number, grain yield and raw protein proportion.
- Taxon
- Field Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Phaseolus vulgarist0 - Treatment
- nitrogen applicatione0
- Outcome
- pod number, grain yield and raw protein proportione0
- Direction
- positivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nitrogen application exerted a significant and positive effect on pod number, grain yield and raw protein proportion”
t0“Field Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
nitrogen application had no significant effect on seed number per pod and weight of thousand seeds.
- Taxon
- Field Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- nitrogen applicatione0
- Outcome
- seed number per pod and weight of thousand seedse0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nitrogen application exerted a significant and positive effect on pod number, grain yield and raw protein proportion, whereas no significant effect was seen on seed number per pod and weight of thousand seeds”
t0“Field Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
phosphorous doses had weren’t found to be significant on all of the factors.
- Taxon
- Field Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- phosphorous dosese0
- Outcome
- all of the factorse0
- Direction
- weren’t found to be significante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“As for the effects of phosphorous doses, they weren’t found to be significant for all of the factors.”
t0“Field Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
bacteria inoculation had positive on pod number per plant and grain yield.
- Taxon
- Field Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- bacteria inoculatione0
- Outcome
- pod number per plant and grain yielde0
- Direction
- positivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“bacteria inoculation exerted a significant and positive effect on pod number per plant and grain yield”
t0“Field Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
bacteria inoculation had no effect on weight of thousand seeds and raw protein rate.
- Taxon
- Field Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- bacteria inoculatione0
- Outcome
- weight of thousand seeds and raw protein ratee0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“bacteria inoculation exerted a significant and positive effect on pod number per plant and grain yield, whereas no effect of this application was seen on weight of thousand seeds and raw protein rate”
t0“Field Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →nitrogen · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →nitrogen · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
152 papers more in this group
See all 156 papers →inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.