Paper · 2009 · Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO)

Water flux of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz bunches throughout development and in relation to late-season weight loss

Greer, Dennis; id_orcid 0000-0002-9083-9939; Rogiers, Suzy

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Vitis vinifera (L.) cv. Shiraz commonly loses a significant amount of bunch water during late ripening, with attendant yield losses. The objective of the study was to quantitatively assess the hypothesis that this sustained weight loss was due to decreased vascular flow and increased transpiration. Transpiration, fresh and dry weights, and water content of whole attached grape bunches were measured from flowering to maturity on vines grown in controlled environments and in the vineyard. Seasonal changes in net water fluxes into and out of bunches were determined. A simple technique of weighing bunches in situ also provided independent measurement of daily rates of water gain and loss. Bunch transpiration rates were high just after flowering but declined to 0.2 g g (dry wt)-1 d-1 at about harvest date. Bunch net water import rates also showed a 90% decrease with development from 1.0 to 0.1 g g (dry wt)-1 d-1. Comparisons of these rates revealed net water import exceeded transpiration throughout early and midbunch development. However, at 60 to 80 days after flowering, import rates had declined to an extent that transpiration now exceeded import and an overall loss of water occurred. Quantitatively comparable rates of water gain and loss determined on Shiraz bunches over four growing seasons on vineyard-grown vines conformed closely with those rates determined as above. Changes in diurnal bunch water fluxes supported the conclusion that net water import exceeded transpiration losses throughout bunch development until the late stage of ripening. The hypothesis that sustained weight loss in late-ripening Shiraz grape bunches occurred because bunch water fluxes shifted from a net import to a net loss by transpiration was confirmed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunch transpiration declined to 0.2 g per g dry weight per day by harvest.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. cv. ShirazVitis viniferat0
Outcome
Bunch transpiration ratese0
Direction
declinede0
Value
0.2 g g (dry wt)-1 d-1e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bunch transpiration rates were high just after flowering but declined to 0.2 g g (dry wt)-1 d-1 at about harvest date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–811 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net bunch water import decreased 90% with development.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. cv. ShirazVitis viniferat0
Outcome
Bunch net water import ratese0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bunch net water import rates also showed a 90% decrease with development from 1.0 to 0.1 g g (dry wt)-1 d-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–920 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net water import exceeded transpiration in early and mid bunch development.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. cv. ShirazVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
bunche0
Outcome
net water importe0
Direction
exceedede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“net water import exceeded transpiration throughout early and midbunch development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1039 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

From 60 to 80 days after flowering, transpiration exceeded import and bunch water was lost.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. cv. ShirazVitis viniferat0
Outcome
overall loss of watere0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“at 60 to 80 days after flowering, import rates had declined to an extent that transpiration now exceeded import and an overall loss of water occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In situ vineyard measurements over four seasons closely matched prior water gain and loss rates.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. cv. ShirazVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
bunche0
Outcome
rates of water gain and losse0
Direction
conformed closelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Quantitatively comparable rates of water gain and loss determined on Shiraz bunches over four growing seasons on vineyard-grown vines conformed closely with those rates determined as above”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1389 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net import exceeded transpiration losses until late ripening.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. cv. ShirazVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
bunche0
Outcome
net water importe0
Direction
exceedede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“net water import exceeded transpiration losses throughout bunch development until the late stage of ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1567 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sustained late ripening bunch weight loss was attributed to a shift from net import to transpiration driven water loss.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. cv. ShirazVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
bunche0
Outcome
sustained weight losse0
Direction
losse0
Qualifier
bunch water fluxes shifted from a net import to a net loss by transpiratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“sustained weight loss in late-ripening Shiraz grape bunches occurred because bunch water fluxes shifted from a net import to a net loss by transpiration was confirmed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1755 · show in text ↑