Paper · 1996 · TSpace

On-farm evaluation of soybean and cassava intercropping in south-westNigeria

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

African Crop Science Journal Vol.5. No.2, pp.151-158 1997 On-farm evaluation of soybean and cassava intercropping in south-west Nigeria H. TIJANI-ENIOLA and F. K. AKINNIFESI Code Number: CS96052 Sizes of Files: Text: 18.2K Graphics: Tables (gif) - 55.2K ABSTRACT Farmer-participatory and researcher-managed trials were conducted at Ayepe, in south-west Nigeria, between July, 1991 and October, 1992, to determine the biophysical compatibility of soybean and cassava intercrop and the optimum time for introducing cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) in soybean-based intercropping systems. Soybean (Glycine max L. ) was planted in monoculture and also intercropped with cassava at varying stages of soybean development. Results indicated that seed yield of soybean was depressed by intercropping. Land equivalent ratio (LER) increased with growth stage of soybean prior to introduction of the cassava intercrop. Yield of soybean ranged from 327 kg ha^-1 to 642 kg ha^-1 in farmers' fields, and from 723 kg ha^-1 to 1201 kg ha^-1 in the researcher managed field. Intercropping caused slight etiolation during the early growth of cassava but this disappeared after soybean harvest. Tuberous root yield of cassava was improved by intercropping irrespective of the stage of development of soybean. Relative total yield increased with growth stage of soybean prior to introduction of cassava. Both crops were least competitive with each other when intercropped at 6 weeks after sowing soybean. Introducing cassava into soybean in a relay-intercropping system is advantageous for this agroecological zone. Key Words: Cassava, soybean, relay intercropping, yield advantage Resume Des essais en collaboration avec des fermiers et geres par des chercheurs ont ete menee entre juillet 1991 et octobre 1992 e eyepe (sud-est du Nigeria) afin de dAterminer la compatibilite biophysique du soya et du manioc pour la culture intercalaire et le temps optimal pour introduire le manioc (Manhiot esculenta Crantz) dans un systeme intercalaire e base de soya. Le soya (Glycine max L.) etait plante en monoculture ainsi qu'en culture intercalaire avec manioc e des stades variables du soya. Les resultats indiquaient que le rendement du soya est diminue par la culture intercalaire. La proportion d'equivalence de terre (LER) augmente avec le stade de developpement du soya au moment de l'introduction de la culture intercalaire. Le rendement de soya variait de 327 kg par ha jusque 642/ha sur les champs des fermiers, et de 723 jusque 1201 sur les champs geres par les chercheurs. La culture intercalaire causait un etiolement pendant la croissance initiale du manioc, mais ceci disparait apres la recolte du soya. Le rendement des racines tubereuses de manioc augmentait en culture intercalaire et ceci etait independant du stade de developpement du soya. Le rendement relatif total augmentait avec le stade de developpement du soya avant l'introduction du manioc. La concurrence entre les deux cultures atteignait son niveau le plus bas quand l'intercalation se faisait 6 semaines apres le semis de soya. L'introduction du manioc en intercalation avec la culture du soya est avantageuse dans cette zone agroecologique. Mots Cles: Manioc, soya, culture intercalaire en relais, avantage au rendement Copyright 1997 The African Crop Science Society

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping depressed soybean seed yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
seed yield of soybeane0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield of soybean was depressed by intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–793 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalent ratio increased as soybean was older when cassava was introduced.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
introduction of the cassava intercrope0
Outcome
Land equivalent ratio (LER)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Land equivalent ratio (LER) increased with growth stage of soybean prior to introduction of the cassava intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–908 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield ranged from 327 to 642 kg per hectare in farmer fields.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
Yield of soybeane0
Value
327 kg ha^-1 to 642 kg ha^-1e0
Setting
farmers' fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of soybean ranged from 327 kg ha^-1 to 642 kg ha^-1 in farmers' fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–986 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield ranged from 723 to 1201 kg per hectare in researcher managed fields.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
Yield of soybeane0
Value
723 kg ha^-1 to 1201 kg ha^-1e0
Setting
researcher managed fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of soybean ranged from 327 kg ha^-1 to 642 kg ha^-1 in farmers' fields, and from 723 kg ha^-1 to 1201 kg ha^-1 in the researcher managed field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping caused slight cassava etiolation early in growth that disappeared after soybean harvest.

Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
etiolation during the early growth of cassavae0
Direction
causede0
Qualifier
disappeared after soybean harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping caused slight etiolation during the early growth of cassava but this disappeared after soybean harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping improved cassava tuberous root yield regardless of soybean developmental stage.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
Tuberous root yield of cassavae0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
irrespective of the stage of development of soybeane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuberous root yield of cassava was improved by intercropping irrespective of the stage of development of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1290 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative total yield increased with later soybean growth stage at cassava introduction.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
introduction of cassavae0
Outcome
Relative total yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative total yield increased with growth stage of soybean prior to introduction of cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1384 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The crops competed least when intercropped six weeks after soybean sowing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
intercropped at 6 weeks after sowing soybeane0
Outcome
least competitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both crops were least competitive with each other when intercropped at 6 weeks after sowing soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1485 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded cassava introduction into soybean relay intercrops is advantageous in this zone.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
Introducing cassava into soybean in a relay-intercropping systeme0
Setting
this agroecological zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Introducing cassava into soybean in a relay-intercropping system is advantageous for this agroecological zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1596 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

intercropping · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

218 papers: 131 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

214 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.