Paper · 2026 · Horticulturae

Cauliflower Yield, Growth, and Physiological Responses to Environments, Fall Planting Dates, and Cultivars in North Dakota

Ajay Dhukuchhu; Ozkan Kaya; Harlene Hatterman-Valenti

20
claims
42
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Environmental stress and suboptimal planting schedules are among the most significant factors limiting cauliflower production by disrupting developmental timing, reducing photosynthetic efficiency, and compromising curd quality. This study investigated the effects of growing environment (high tunnel vs. open field), planting date (10 July, 25 July, and 10 August), and cultivar selection (Amazing, Cheddar, Clementine, Flame Star, Snow Crown, and Vitaverde) on yield components, root morphology, vegetative growth, and physiological performance in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) across two growing seasons. Field environment, planting date, cultivar, and their interactions were found to be significant for all parameters (p < 0.05). In general, open-field production achieved higher yields than high tunnels and shortened maturity, and early transplanting (10 July) maximized performance, producing a higher yield and larger curd size, while delaying to August 10 reduced the yield by ~49% and curd diameter by ~24%. Among cultivars, Flame Star, Snow Crown, and Cheddar were the highest-yielding cultivars overall, whereas Vitaverde performed the poorest. Under early planting, Flame Star showed exceptional productivity (1528 g), curd diameter (19.4 cm), and root development. Late planting decreased root biomass by ~38%. Physiological responses varied across environments and planting dates, with high tunnels showing greater stomatal conductance and transpiration, open-field plants exhibiting higher water-use efficiency, and early July plantings maintaining superior photosynthetic performance compared to later schedules. Correlation and hierarchical clustering analyses demonstrated strong integrated relationships among yield, curd diameter (r = 0.94), fresh root weight (r = 0.62), and root dimensions. Overall, it was concluded that open-field cultivation combined with early July planting using high-performing cultivars such as Flame Star, Snow Crown, and Cheddar significantly optimized cauliflower production by maximizing vegetative growth, enhancing resource acquisition, and ensuring optimal curd development. Early planting strategies emerged as the most effective approach, demonstrating up to 108% yield advantage over delayed schedules. These findings suggest that environment-adapted cultivar selection and strategic temporal management offer a viable approach to enhancing cauliflower productivity under variable climatic conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing environment, planting date, cultivar and their interactions significantly affected all cauliflower parameters.

Outcome
all parameterse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field environment, planting date, cultivar, and their interactions were found to be significant for all parameters (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Open-field production gave higher cauliflower yields than high tunnels.

Treatment
open-field productione1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
high tunnelse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e1

“In general, open-field production achieved higher yields than high tunnels and shortened maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Open-field production shortened cauliflower maturity compared with high tunnels.

Treatment
open-field productione1
Outcome
maturitye1
Direction
shortenede1
Comparator
high tunnelse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e1

“In general, open-field production achieved higher yields than high tunnels and shortened maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early transplanting on 10 July gave a higher cauliflower yield.

Treatment
early transplanting (10 July)e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higher yielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e1

“early transplanting (10 July) maximized performance, producing a higher yield and larger curd size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early transplanting on 10 July gave a larger cauliflower curd size.

Treatment
early transplanting (10 July)e1
Outcome
curd sizee1
Direction
largere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e1

“early transplanting (10 July) maximized performance, producing a higher yield and larger curd size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying planting to 10 August reduced cauliflower yield by about 49%.

Treatment
delaying to August 10e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Value
~49%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e1

“delaying to August 10 reduced the yield by ~49%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying planting to 10 August reduced cauliflower curd diameter by about 24%.

Treatment
delaying to August 10e1
Outcome
curd diametere2
Direction
reducede1
Value
~24%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e1

“delaying to August 10 reduced the yield by ~49%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1007 · show in text ↑
e2

“curd diameter by ~24%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1033 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flame Star, Snow Crown and Cheddar were the highest-yielding cauliflower cultivars overall.

Material
Flame Star, Snow Crown, and Cheddare3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highest-yieldinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e3

“Flame Star, Snow Crown, and Cheddar were the highest-yielding cultivars overall, whereas Vitaverde performed the poorest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1172 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitaverde performed the poorest among the cauliflower cultivars.

Material
Vitaverdee3
Outcome
performed the pooreste3
Direction
pooreste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e3

“Flame Star, Snow Crown, and Cheddar were the highest-yielding cultivars overall, whereas Vitaverde performed the poorest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1172 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flame Star showed exceptional cauliflower productivity (1528 g) under early planting.

Material
Flame Stare4
Outcome
productivitye4
Value
1528 ge4
Qualifier
Under early plantinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under early planting, Flame Star showed exceptional productivity (1528 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1247 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flame Star had a curd diameter of 19.4 cm under early planting.

Material
Flame Stare4
Outcome
curd diametere5
Value
19.4 cme5
Qualifier
Under early plantinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under early planting, Flame Star showed exceptional productivity (1528 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1247 · show in text ↑
e5

“curd diameter (19.4 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting decreased cauliflower root biomass by about 38%.

Treatment
Late plantinge6
Outcome
root biomasse6
Direction
decreasede6
Value
~38%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e6

“Late planting decreased root biomass by ~38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High tunnels gave greater stomatal conductance and transpiration in cauliflower.

Treatment
high tunnelse7
Outcome
stomatal conductance and transpiratione7
Direction
greatere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e7

“high tunnels showing greater stomatal conductance and transpiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Open-field cauliflower plants had higher water-use efficiency.

Treatment
open-fielde0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e0

“open-field plants exhibiting higher water-use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early July plantings maintained superior photosynthetic performance compared with later schedules in cauliflower.

Treatment
early July plantingse1
Outcome
photosynthetic performancee1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
later schedulese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e1

“early July plantings maintaining superior photosynthetic performance compared to later schedules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1645 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and curd diameter of cauliflower were strongly related (r = 0.94).

Outcome
strong integrated relationships among yield, curd diametere2
Value
r = 0.94e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e2

“strong integrated relationships among yield, curd diameter (r = 0.94)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1778 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh root weight of cauliflower was correlated with the integrated trait set (r = 0.62).

Outcome
fresh root weighte3
Value
r = 0.62e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e3

“fresh root weight (r = 0.62)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1780–1808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting gave up to 108% yield advantage over delayed schedules in cauliflower.

Treatment
Early planting strategiese4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
yield advantagee4
Value
108%e4
Comparator
delayed schedulese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e4

“Early planting strategies emerged as the most effective approach, demonstrating up to 108% yield advantage over delayed schedules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2275 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Open-field cultivation with early July planting and high-performing cultivars optimized cauliflower production.

Outcome
cauliflower productione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e5

“open-field cultivation combined with early July planting using high-performing cultivars such as Flame Star, Snow Crown, and Cheddar significantly optimized cauliflower production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–2041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting strategies were the most effective approach for cauliflower.

Treatment
Early planting strategiese4
Outcome
most effective approache4
Direction
most effectivee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e4

“Early planting strategies emerged as the most effective approach, demonstrating up to 108% yield advantage over delayed schedules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2275 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

sowing time · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

sowing time · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

transplanting · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 40 positive, 10 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.