Paper · 2026 · Plant Health Progress

Efficacy of Fungicides for Control of Apple Bitter Rot in Georgia, 2025

O. Melton; W. Shepard; S. Breeden; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bitter rot, caused by a Colletotrichum spp. complex, is a significant disease of apples in the southeastern United States. Symptoms include target-like spots on fruit that render the fruit unmarketable. This report assesses the effectiveness of two fungicides for managing bitter rot. The trial was conducted in 2025 in Blairsville, GA, on a 24-year-old block of Malus × domestica ‘Royal Empire’. Treatments included an untreated control, a standard fungicide spray regimen, Axios, and Bacix. The standard regimen performed as expected, providing substantial control of bitter rot compared with the untreated control. Axios, while showing some efficacy, did not achieve control comparable to that of the chemical standard regimen. Bacix showed no efficacy against bitter rot in this trial.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A standard fungicide spray regimen gave substantial control of bitter rot in apple compared with the untreated control.

Taxon
Malus × domesticaMalus domesticae0
Material
Royal Empiree0
Treatment
standard regimene1
Outcome
bitter rote1
Direction
substantial controle1
Comparator
untreated controle1
Setting
Blairsville, GAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2025 in Blairsville, GA, on a 24-year-old block of Malus × domestica ‘Royal Empire’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–395 · show in text ↑
e1

“The standard regimen performed as expected, providing substantial control of bitter rot compared with the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Axios showed some efficacy against bitter rot but did not achieve control comparable to the chemical standard regimen.

Taxon
Malus × domesticaMalus domesticae0
Material
Royal Empiree0
Treatment
Axiose2
Outcome
controle2
Direction
did not achieve control comparablee2
Comparator
chemical standard regimene2
Setting
Blairsville, GAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2025 in Blairsville, GA, on a 24-year-old block of Malus × domestica ‘Royal Empire’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–395 · show in text ↑
e2

“Axios, while showing some efficacy, did not achieve control comparable to that of the chemical standard regimen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacix showed no efficacy against bitter rot in this trial.

Taxon
Malus × domesticaMalus domesticae0
Material
Royal Empiree0
Treatment
Bacixe3
Outcome
efficacy against bitter rote3
Direction
no efficacye3
Setting
Blairsville, GAe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2025 in Blairsville, GA, on a 24-year-old block of Malus × domestica ‘Royal Empire’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–395 · show in text ↑
e3

“Bacix showed no efficacy against bitter rot in this trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–788 · show in text ↑