Paper · 2026 · University of Twente Research Information

Flexible, wave resistant saltmarsh vegetation survives extreme storms

Mason, Victoria G.; Willemsen, Pim W.J.M.; Muller, Jos R.M.; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Loss of coastal vegetated wetland area is a major threat in times of climate change, particularly where their contribution to coastal protection is increasingly valued. Vegetation survival under extreme conditions is largely unknown, thus vegetation is perceived to be more vulnerable to high impact storms than easily testable ‘hard’ materials, such as asphalt or concrete used in dikes and seawalls. Survival of vegetation under extreme conditions is highly challenging to test, given the unpredictable occurrence of extreme storms in the field and the logistical challenges of simulating large waves in experimental facilities. Here, we made use of the largest wave flume in the world, the Deltaflume (Deltares, the Netherlands), to test the persistence of three species of saltmarsh vegetation (Spartina anglica, Scirpus maritimus and Phragmites australis) under extreme storm conditions: a storm with a return period of >1000 years with up to 3 m high, 8 second period, waves. Persistence of vegetation was unexpectedly high. While vegetation loss increased at higher near-bed velocities, breakage was consistently lower at any given velocity for both plants and mimics with higher flexibility and/or length. The survival of longer stems likely occurred via swaying, which allowed them to effectively avoid wave forcing. Although swaying of stems will reduce their wave attenuating effect compared to (theoretically existing non-breaking) stiff stems, their persistence leads to an overall more storm-resistant marsh canopy remaining after the storm, able to withstand and attenuate repeated storm events.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saltmarsh vegetation persisted unexpectedly well under the extreme simulated storm.

Taxon
saltmarsh vegetatione1
Outcome
Persistence of vegetatione0
Setting
extreme storm conditionse1

Verbatim

e0

“Persistence of vegetation was unexpectedly high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1030 · show in text ↑
e1

“three species of saltmarsh vegetation (Spartina anglica, Scirpus maritimus and Phragmites australis) under extreme storm conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–891 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetation loss increased at higher near-bed velocities.

Taxon
saltmarsh vegetatione1
Outcome
vegetation losse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
higher near-bed velocitiese0

Verbatim

e0

“vegetation loss increased at higher near-bed velocities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1092 · show in text ↑
e1

“saltmarsh vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–797 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breakage was lower at a given velocity in plants with greater flexibility or length.

Taxon
saltmarsh vegetatione1
Outcome
breakagee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
higher flexibility and/or lengthe0

Verbatim

e0

“breakage was consistently lower at any given velocity for both plants and mimics with higher flexibility and/or length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“saltmarsh vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–797 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer stems likely survived by swaying away from wave forcing.

Taxon
saltmarsh vegetatione1
Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
survival of longer stemse0
Qualifier
via swayinge0

Verbatim

e0

“The survival of longer stems likely occurred via swaying, which allowed them to effectively avoid wave forcing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1325 · show in text ↑
e1

“saltmarsh vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–797 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Stem swaying was expected to reduce wave attenuation compared with stiff stems.

Taxon
saltmarsh vegetatione1
Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
wave attenuating effecte0
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
stiff stemse0

Verbatim

e0

“swaying of stems will reduce their wave attenuating effect compared to (theoretically existing non-breaking) stiff stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1455 · show in text ↑
e1

“saltmarsh vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–797 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem persistence leaves a more storm-resistant marsh canopy after a storm.

Taxon
saltmarsh vegetatione1
Outcome
more storm-resistant marsh canopye0
Qualifier
their persistencee0

Verbatim

e0

“their persistence leads to an overall more storm-resistant marsh canopy remaining after the storm, able to withstand and attenuate repeated storm events”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1609 · show in text ↑
e1

“saltmarsh vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–797 · show in text ↑