Paper · 2026 · Journal of Advances in Microbiology

Biological Management of Cotton Target Leaf Spot (Corynespora cassiicola) Using Bacterial Endophytes

E. Rajeswari; M. P. Tamil Malar; R. Nandhini; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: Cotton, a major global fibre and oilseed crop, is significantly affected by foliar diseases like target leaf spot, causing substantial yield losses. Due to concerns over chemical control, endophytic bacteria offer a sustainable alternative by suppressing pathogens through multiple biocontrol mechanisms. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of bacterial endophytes against target leaf spot of cotton under in vitro and field conditions and to identify the most effective endophyte for the eco-friendly management of the disease. Study Design: All the laboratory experiments were conducted using a Completely Randomized Design(CRD) and field experiment was laid out using a Randomized Block Design (RBD). Place and Duration of Study: Department of Plant Pathology and Department of Cotton, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. August 2023- December 2025. Methodology: The target leaf spot pathogen was isolated by tissue isolation method and confirmed as Corynespora cassiicola through morphological and molecular characterization. The efficacy of bacterial endophytes against C. cassiicola was evaluated by dual culture technique. The effect of the most effective endophyte namely B. amyloliquefaciens on mycelial growth of observed through Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) analysis. The lipopeptide antibiotic genes present in the effective entophytes was identified by PCR amplification using gene specific primers. Furthermore, glass house and field experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of effective endophytes against target leaf spot of cotton. Results: A total of 10 bacterial endophytes were screened for their antifungal potential against C. cassiicola by dual culture technique under in vitro conditions. Among these, Bacillus amylolquefaciens stand out as a superior endophyte in inhibiting growth of the C. cassiicola by 72.0 per cent. This was followed by B. safensis, B. megaterium and B. subtilis which repressed the growth by 69.1, 68.8 and 64.1 per cent respectively. Scanning Electron Microscopic observation revealed the hyphae of C. cassiicola exhibited morphological abnormalities such as shrinkage, disintegration and lysis when co cultured along with B. amylolquefaciens. The lipopeptide antibiotics genes such as surfactin, iturin and fengycin were detected in B. amylolquefaciens through PCR amplication using gene specific primers. Foliar application of liquid formulation of B. amylolquefaciens @0.5 % twice first at 45 DAS and second at 60 DAS was found to be promising in suppressing the target leaf spot incidence and increasing the yield under both glass house and field conditions. This treatment also promoted the growth by enhancing the root and shoot length of cotton under glass house conditions. Our results demonstrated that, B. amylolquefaciens could be used as an eco-friendly alternative to chemicals for the sustainable management of target leaf spot in cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus amylolquefaciens inhibited C. cassiicola growth by 72.0 per cent in vitro.

Treatment
Bacillus amylolquefaciense0
Interactor
C. cassiicolaCorynespora cassiicolae0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus amylolquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of the C. cassiicolae0
Direction
inhibitinge0
Value
72.0 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Corynespora cassiicola
Corynespora cassiicola · InteractorDr. Ken Pernezny, Gary Vallad, Abraham Fulmer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus amylolquefaciens stand out as a superior endophyte in inhibiting growth of the C. cassiicola by 72.0 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1763–1882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. safensis repressed C. cassiicola growth by 69.1 per cent.

Treatment
B. safensise0
Interactor
B. safensisBacillus safensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
repressede0
Value
69.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was followed by B. safensis, B. megaterium and B. subtilis which repressed the growth by 69.1, 68.8 and 64.1 per cent respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–2019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. megaterium repressed C. cassiicola growth by 68.8 per cent.

Treatment
B. megateriume0
Interactor
B. megateriumPriestia megateriume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
repressede0
Value
68.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was followed by B. safensis, B. megaterium and B. subtilis which repressed the growth by 69.1, 68.8 and 64.1 per cent respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–2019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis repressed C. cassiicola growth by 64.1 per cent.

Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
repressede0
Value
64.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was followed by B. safensis, B. megaterium and B. subtilis which repressed the growth by 69.1, 68.8 and 64.1 per cent respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–2019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. cassiicola hyphae showed shrinkage, disintegration and lysis during coculture with B. amylolquefaciens.

Treatment
co cultured along with B. amylolquefaciense0
Interactor
C. cassiicolaCorynespora cassiicolae0pathogen
Second interactor
B. amylolquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
hyphae of C. cassiicola exhibited morphological abnormalities such as shrinkage, disintegration and lysise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Corynespora cassiicola
Corynespora cassiicola · InteractorDr. Ken Pernezny, Gary Vallad, Abraham Fulmer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the hyphae of C. cassiicola exhibited morphological abnormalities such as shrinkage, disintegration and lysis when co cultured along with B. amylolquefaciens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surfactin, iturin and fengycin genes were detected in B. amylolquefaciens.

Interactor
B. amylolquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Gene
surfactin, iturin and fengycine0
Outcome
surfactin, iturin and fengycin were detectede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lipopeptide antibiotics genes such as surfactin, iturin and fengycin were detected in B. amylolquefaciens through PCR amplication using gene specific primers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2230–2392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar B. amylolquefaciens at 0.5% twice suppressed target leaf spot incidence in glasshouse and field conditions.

Treatment
Foliar application of liquid formulation of B. amylolquefaciens @0.5 % twice first at 45 DAS and second at 60 DASe0
Interactor
B. amylolquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
target leaf spot incidencee0
Direction
suppressinge0
Setting
glass house and field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of liquid formulation of B. amylolquefaciens @0.5 % twice first at 45 DAS and second at 60 DAS was found to be promising in suppressing the target leaf spot incidence and increasing the yield under both glass house and field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2393–2648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar B. amylolquefaciens at 0.5% twice increased yield in glasshouse and field conditions.

Treatment
Foliar application of liquid formulation of B. amylolquefaciens @0.5 % twice first at 45 DAS and second at 60 DASe0
Interactor
B. amylolquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Setting
glass house and field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of liquid formulation of B. amylolquefaciens @0.5 % twice first at 45 DAS and second at 60 DAS was found to be promising in suppressing the target leaf spot incidence and increasing the yield under both glass house and field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2393–2648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar treatment increased cotton root and shoot length under glasshouse conditions.

Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
root and shoot lengthe0
Direction
enhancinge0
Setting
glass house conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also promoted the growth by enhancing the root and shoot length of cotton under glass house conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2649–2767 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend B. amylolquefaciens as an alternative to chemicals for cotton target leaf spot management.

Interactor
B. amylolquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
sustainable management of target leaf spote0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. amylolquefaciens could be used as an eco-friendly alternative to chemicals for the sustainable management of target leaf spot in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2799–2938 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.