Paper · 2026 · The Plant Journal

Several plant self‐incompatibility systems may be controlled by atypical receptor–ligand interactions

Zongcheng Lin; Maurice Bosch; Vernonica E. Franklin‐Tong

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Self-incompatibility (SI) is the single most important mechanism utilized by flowering plants to avoid self-fertilization, thus preventing inbreeding and promoting outcrossing. Many plant SI systems are genetically controlled by a multi-allelic S-locus, containing two tightly linked genes that encode the female and male S-determinants. When pollen lands on a "self" pistil, interaction between cognate female and male S-determinants induces an SI signaling response, resulting in the failure of self-fertilization. Here, we review currently known SI systems that utilize receptor-ligand interactions to control pollen rejection on the stigma surface. Although detailed molecular and cellular information is only known for the SI systems in the Brassicaceae and Papaveraceae, it is apparent that the S-determinants of other SI systems (e.g., in the Poaceae and the Convolvulaceae) are likely to also utilize receptor-ligand interactions to prevent self-fertilization. Strikingly, although most of these systems all appear to utilize cysteine-rich proteins (CRPs) as ligands to induce an SI response, only one of these receptors is a receptor-like kinase (RLK); the other "receptors" identified to date are proteins of unknown function, which we propose to be atypical receptors (ATRs). Although many of these receptors were identified some time ago, their atypical nature raises many questions, including how they function mechanistically, how they evolved and whether they are found in other plant cell-cell communication systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Known stigma-surface self-incompatibility systems use receptor–ligand interactions to control pollen rejection.

Outcome
pollen rejectione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“SI systems that utilize receptor-ligand interactions to control pollen rejection on the stigma surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–651 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Detailed molecular and cellular information is available for Brassicaceae and Papaveraceae self-incompatibility systems.

Taxon
Brassicaceae and PapaveraceaePapaveraceaeBrassicaceaee0
Outcome
detailed molecular and cellular informatione0

Verbatim

e0

“detailed molecular and cellular information is only known for the SI systems in the Brassicaceae and Papaveraceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–775 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Poaceae and Convolvulaceae self-incompatibility systems are likely to use receptor–ligand interactions.

Taxon
Poaceae and the ConvolvulaceaeConvolvulaceaePoaceaee0
Gene
S-determinantse0
Outcome
prevent self-fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“S-determinants of other SI systems (e.g., in the Poaceae and the Convolvulaceae) are likely to also utilize receptor-ligand interactions to prevent self-fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–967 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Most reviewed systems appear to use cysteine-rich proteins as self-incompatibility ligands.

Gene
cysteine-rich proteins (CRPs)e0
Outcome
ligands to induce an SI responsee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“most of these systems all appear to utilize cysteine-rich proteins (CRPs) as ligands to induce an SI response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1099 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Only one identified self-incompatibility receptor is a receptor-like kinase; others are proteins of unknown function proposed as atypical receptors.

Gene
receptor-like kinase (RLK)e0
Outcome
proteins of unknown functione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“only one of these receptors is a receptor-like kinase (RLK); the other "receptors" identified to date are proteins of unknown function, which we propose to be atypical receptors (ATRs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1285 · show in text ↑