Paper · 2026 · Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences

Investigating Coastal Vegetation Dynamics and Ecosystem Impacts Under Elevated CO 2 and Temperature: A Process‐Based Approach

Junyan Ding; Nate McDowell; Nathan Conroy; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Coastal forests are increasingly vulnerable to climate change and sea‐level rise, with flooding and salinity driving transitions to marsh‐dominated ecosystems. Using the coastal version of FATES‐Hydro, we conducted 30‐year simulations at two coastal forest sites—a broadleaf swamp white oak stand at Lake Erie and a conifer loblolly pine stand at Chesapeake Bay—under historical climate and elevated CO 2 (+100 ppm) and temperature (+1.5°C) scenarios. Elevated CO 2 increased net primary productivity at both sites, while warming alone intensified hydraulic stress and accelerated mortality, particularly in the conifer stand. Simulations show that elevated temperatures intensify vapor pressure deficit and hydraulic stress on trees already experiencing salinity‐ and submersion‐driven water stress, increasing tree mortality beyond what would be expected in a non‐water‐limited environment. Marsh expansion partially compensated for tree loss at the Lake Erie site but reduced ecosystem productivity in the conifer forest at Chesapeake Bay. Our results highlight how differences in stand structure, phenology, and local hydrology modulate ecosystem trajectories under climate change, emphasizing the importance of demographic and community‐level processes for predicting the fate of coastal forests.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 (+100 ppm) increased net primary productivity of coastal forests relative to historical climate in simulations.

Taxon
coastal forestse2
Treatment
elevated CO 2 (+100 ppm)e0
Outcome
net primary productivitye1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
historical climatee0

Verbatim

e2

“Coastal forests are increasingly vulnerable to climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“under historical climate and elevated CO 2 (+100 ppm) and temperature (+1.5°C) scenarios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“Elevated CO 2 increased net primary productivity at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Warming alone intensified hydraulic stress in coastal forests in simulations.

Taxon
coastal forestse2
Treatment
warming alonee3
Outcome
hydraulic stresse3
Direction
intensifiede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“Coastal forests are increasingly vulnerable to climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–70 · show in text ↑
e3

“warming alone intensified hydraulic stress and accelerated mortality, particularly in the conifer stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Warming alone accelerated tree mortality, particularly in the loblolly pine stand.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae5
Treatment
warming alonee3
Outcome
mortalitye3
Direction
acceleratede3
Qualifier
particularly in the conifer stande3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“a conifer loblolly pine stand at Chesapeake Bay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–370 · show in text ↑
e3

“warming alone intensified hydraulic stress and accelerated mortality, particularly in the conifer stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–634 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Marsh expansion partially compensated for tree loss at the swamp white oak stand at Lake Erie.

Taxon
swamp white oakQuercus bicolore6
Treatment
Marsh expansione4
Outcome
tree losse4
Direction
partially compensatede4
Setting
Lake Erie sitee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus bicolor
Quercus bicolor · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“a broadleaf swamp white oak stand at Lake Erie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–318 · show in text ↑
e4

“Marsh expansion partially compensated for tree loss at the Lake Erie site but reduced ecosystem productivity in the conifer forest at Chesapeake Bay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1050 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Marsh expansion reduced ecosystem productivity in the loblolly pine forest at Chesapeake Bay.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae5
Treatment
Marsh expansione4
Outcome
ecosystem productivitye4
Direction
reducede4
Setting
Chesapeake Baye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“a conifer loblolly pine stand at Chesapeake Bay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–370 · show in text ↑
e4

“Marsh expansion partially compensated for tree loss at the Lake Erie site but reduced ecosystem productivity in the conifer forest at Chesapeake Bay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1050 · show in text ↑