Paper · 2026 · FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Zn-mobilizing bacteria improve shoot biomass and zinc content in wheat

Belay Berza; Fassil Assefa; Tesfaye Wubet; et al.

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Enhancing zinc (Zn) content in wheat grains by using Zn-mobilizing rhizosphere bacteria is becoming an eco-friendly and sustainable alternative to conventional approaches such as chemical fertilization. Our study aimed to isolate, screen, and evaluate Zn-mobilizing rhizosphere bacteria to improve its content in wheat biomass. Wheat rhizosphere soils were collected in several wheat planted soils in Ethiopia and Zn-solubilizing bacteria were isolated and screened for their plant beneficial traits. Isolates W8_A, W25_A, and W63_B were selected. Pot experiments were conducted in sterilized river sand supplemented with 0.05% zinc oxide by using these isolates. The experiment consisted of nine treatments in complete randomized design with four replications. Data were means of three independent experiments. W8_A, W25_A, and W63_B exhibited zinc solubilization index > 4.0. Consortium inoculation showed the highest improvements in plant growth. Inoculations improved shoot length and dry weigh on average by 67.4% and 84.2%, respectively compared to the control. On average, 90.2% root and 75.5% shoot Zn content increased compared to the untreated control. Hence, the isolates can be applied for Zn bio-fortification in wheat to combat Zn deficiencies in food grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected isolates had zinc solubilization indices above 4.0.

Interactor
W8_A, W25_A, and W63_Be0symbiont
Outcome
zinc solubilization indexe0
Direction
>e0
Value
> 4.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W8_A, W25_A, and W63_B exhibited zinc solubilization index > 4.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Zn-mobilizing bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium inoculation gave the highest improvement in wheat growth.

Treatment
Consortium inoculatione0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consortium inoculation showed the highest improvements in plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Zn-mobilizing bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased shoot length by 67.4% against control.

Treatment
Inoculationse0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
67.4%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations improved shoot length and dry weigh on average by 67.4% and 84.2%, respectively compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Zn-mobilizing bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased shoot dry weight by 84.2% against control.

Treatment
Inoculationse0
Outcome
dry weighe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
84.2%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations improved shoot length and dry weigh on average by 67.4% and 84.2%, respectively compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Zn-mobilizing bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation raised root Zn content by 90.2% against untreated control.

Treatment
Zn-mobilizing bacteriat1
Outcome
roote0
Direction
increasede0
Value
90.2%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average, 90.2% root and 75.5% shoot Zn content increased compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Zn-mobilizing bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation raised shoot Zn content by 75.5% against untreated control.

Treatment
Zn-mobilizing bacteriat1
Outcome
shoot Zn contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
75.5%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average, 90.2% root and 75.5% shoot Zn content increased compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Zn-mobilizing bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the isolates for wheat Zn biofortification.

Treatment
isolatese0
Outcome
Zn bio-fortification in wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the isolates can be applied for Zn bio-fortification in wheat to combat Zn deficiencies in food grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Zn-mobilizing bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.