Paper · 2018 · Annals of Microbiology

Prospecting endophytes from different Fe or Zn accumulating wheat genotypes for their influence as inoculants on plant growth, yield, and micronutrient content

Devendra Singh; Neelam Geat; Mahendra Vikram Singh Rajawat; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
91
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The plant microbiome is known to play a significant role in improving plant productivity and quality of produce, and the endophytic component was explored toward developing inoculants for enhancing micronutrient concentration in grains. A set of 213 endophytes (201 bacteria and 12 fungi) were isolated, from a set of 13 wheat genotypes, identified through preliminary screening as low and high iron and zinc accumulating genotypes. A pot experiment, with two low accumulator genotypes and eight selected endophytes, was undertaken, followed by field evaluation with both high and low Zn or Fe accumulator genotypes. Screening of these endophytes identified 11 bacteria and 2 fungi as being efficient for zinc solubilization, while 10 bacteria and 2 fungi were promising siderophore producers. Zinc and iron uptake were enhanced by one to several folds over the recommended dose of NPK (RDF) in the pot experiment. Two sets of promising endophytes, identified as Bacillus subtilis (DS-178) and Arthrobacter sp. (DS-179) for zinc accumulation, and Arthrobacter sulfonivorans (DS-68) and Enterococcus hirae (DS-163) for iron acquisition in grains, were selected. Significant increase of 14–20% in plant growth and yield was recorded in field experiment, with 75% increase, over RDF, in terms of Fe or Zn accumulation in wheat grains. Phytic acid, an anti-nutritional factor, was significantly lower in grains from endophyte inoculated treatments in the wheat genotypes evaluated. This illustrated the promise of these endophytes in improving both the translocation of micronutrients and enhancing the quality of wheat grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Screening identified 11 bacteria and 2 fungi efficient for zinc solubilization.

Interactor
endophytese0symbiont
Outcome
zinc solubilizatione0
Value
11 bacteria and 2 fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Screening of these endophytes identified 11 bacteria and 2 fungi as being efficient for zinc solubilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–724 · show in text ↑
e1

“13 wheat genotypes, identified through preliminary screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–378 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Screening identified 10 bacteria and 2 fungi as promising siderophore producers.

Interactor
endophytese2symbiont
Outcome
siderophore producerse0
Value
10 bacteria and 2 fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 bacteria and 2 fungi were promising siderophore producers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–792 · show in text ↑
e1

“13 wheat genotypes, identified through preliminary screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–378 · show in text ↑
e2

“Screening of these endophytes identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytes enhanced zinc and iron uptake by one to several folds over RDF in pots.

Treatment
endophytese2
Interactor
endophytese2symbiont
Outcome
Zinc and iron uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
one to several foldse0
Comparator
recommended dose of NPK (RDF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc and iron uptake were enhanced by one to several folds over the recommended dose of NPK (RDF) in the pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“13 wheat genotypes, identified through preliminary screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–378 · show in text ↑
e2

“Screening of these endophytes identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–657 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis DS-178 and Arthrobacter sp. DS-179 were selected for zinc accumulation.

Interactor
Bacillus subtilis (DS-178)Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Second interactor
Arthrobacter sp. (DS-179)Arthrobacter sp.e0symbiont
Outcome
zinc accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Arthrobacter sp.
Arthrobacter sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Microbeteacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus subtilis (DS-178) and Arthrobacter sp. (DS-179) for zinc accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“13 wheat genotypes, identified through preliminary screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–378 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arthrobacter sulfonivorans DS-68 and Enterococcus hirae DS-163 were selected for grain iron acquisition.

Interactor
Arthrobacter sulfonivorans (DS-68)Pseudarthrobacter sulfonivoranse0symbiont
Second interactor
Enterococcus hirae (DS-163)Enterococcus hiraee0symbiont
Outcome
iron acquisition in grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arthrobacter sulfonivorans (DS-68) and Enterococcus hirae (DS-163) for iron acquisition in grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1144 · show in text ↑
e1

“13 wheat genotypes, identified through preliminary screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophyte treatments significantly increased wheat growth and yield in the field by 14–20%.

Treatment
endophyte inoculated treatmentse2
Interactor
endophytee2symbiont
Outcome
plant growth and yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14–20%e0
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase of 14–20% in plant growth and yield was recorded in field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1250 · show in text ↑
e1

“13 wheat genotypes, identified through preliminary screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–378 · show in text ↑
e2

“grains from endophyte inoculated treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytes increased grain Fe or Zn accumulation by 75% over RDF.

Treatment
endophyte inoculated treatmentse1
Interactor
endophytee1symbiont
Outcome
Fe or Zn accumulation in wheat grainse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75% increase, over RDF, in terms of Fe or Zn accumulation in wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1330 · show in text ↑
e1

“grains from endophyte inoculated treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophyte inoculation significantly lowered phytic acid in wheat grains.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
endophyte inoculated treatmentse0
Interactor
endophytee0symbiont
Outcome
Phytic acide0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytic acid, an anti-nutritional factor, was significantly lower in grains from endophyte inoculated treatments in the wheat genotypes evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1476 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 95 positive, 10 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.