Paper · 2026 · European Journal of Soil Science

Boosting Lignin and Microbial Necromass Sequestration and Crop Productivity With Strategic Tillage in No‐Till Systems

Lixiao Ma; Xiao Wang; Xiaolin Chen; et al.

14
claims
38
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Can strategic tillage in no‐till help or hinder its benefits of soil organic carbon (SOC) biochemistry and associated functionality? To address this issue, we used three biomarkers—free lipids, lignin phenols, and amino sugars—to quantify SOC characteristics such as composition, lability, and origins, and assessed soil quality and crop yields based on an 8‐year field trial with conventional tillage (CT), no‐till (NT), and strategic tillage (ST) in Northeast China. In the entire 0–30 cm profile, ST raised SOC, lignin phenols, and microbial necromass carbon (MNC) stocks by 21%, 36%, and 24%, respectively, compared to CT, whereas the differences in plant‐derived biomolecules and overall SOC between ST and NT were minimal. Instead, NT exhibited stratified free lipids, showing higher microbial‐, plant‐derived, and total lipids by 28%, 25%, and 33%, respectively, than CT in topsoil. Both NT and ST increased lignin phenols by 36% and 109% in the 0–20 cm layer compared to CT, emphasizing the preserved plant‐derived compounds. ST again displayed higher levels of fungal and total MNC by 28%–43% and 23%–34%, respectively, than CT and NT in sublayers (> 5 cm), indicating the buildup of distinct microbial‐derived compounds. Both ST and NT significantly outperformed CT in terms of soil quality index and corn yields, highlighting their long‐term effectiveness. Collectively, ST could be recommended as a promising option to alleviate the limitations of no‐till farming by accumulating plant and microbial molecules and improving soil quality in a Mollisol.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strategic tillage increased soil organic carbon stocks by 21% over conventional tillage in the 0–30 cm profile.

Treatment
STe0
Outcome
SOCe0
Direction
raisede0
Value
21%e0
Qualifier
0–30 cm profilee0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the entire 0–30 cm profile, ST raised SOC, lignin phenols, and microbial necromass carbon (MNC) stocks by 21%, 36%, and 24%, respectively, compared to CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strategic tillage increased lignin phenol stocks by 36% over conventional tillage.

Treatment
STe0
Outcome
lignin phenolse0
Direction
raisede0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the entire 0–30 cm profile, ST raised SOC, lignin phenols, and microbial necromass carbon (MNC) stocks by 21%, 36%, and 24%, respectively, compared to CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strategic tillage increased microbial necromass carbon stocks by 24% over conventional tillage.

Treatment
STe0
Outcome
microbial necromass carbon (MNC) stockse0
Direction
raisede0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the entire 0–30 cm profile, ST raised SOC, lignin phenols, and microbial necromass carbon (MNC) stocks by 21%, 36%, and 24%, respectively, compared to CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strategic and no-till systems had minimal differences in plant-derived biomolecules and overall soil organic carbon.

Treatment
STe0
Outcome
plant‐derived biomolecules and overall SOCe0
Direction
minimale0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the differences in plant‐derived biomolecules and overall SOC between ST and NT were minimal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till raised microbial-derived topsoil lipids by 28% over conventional tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
microbial‐e0
Direction
highere0
Value
28%e0
Qualifier
topsoile0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NT exhibited stratified free lipids, showing higher microbial‐, plant‐derived, and total lipids by 28%, 25%, and 33%, respectively, than CT in topsoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till raised plant-derived topsoil lipids by 25% over conventional tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
plant‐derivede0
Direction
highere0
Value
25%e0
Qualifier
topsoile0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NT exhibited stratified free lipids, showing higher microbial‐, plant‐derived, and total lipids by 28%, 25%, and 33%, respectively, than CT in topsoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till raised total topsoil lipids by 33% over conventional tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
total lipidse0
Direction
highere0
Value
33%e0
Qualifier
topsoile0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NT exhibited stratified free lipids, showing higher microbial‐, plant‐derived, and total lipids by 28%, 25%, and 33%, respectively, than CT in topsoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till increased lignin phenols by 36% relative to conventional tillage in the 0–20 cm layer.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
lignin phenolse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both NT and ST increased lignin phenols by 36% and 109% in the 0–20 cm layer compared to CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strategic tillage increased lignin phenols by 109% relative to conventional tillage in the 0–20 cm layer.

Treatment
STe0
Outcome
lignin phenolse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
109%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both NT and ST increased lignin phenols by 36% and 109% in the 0–20 cm layer compared to CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strategic tillage had 28%–43% higher fungal microbial necromass carbon than conventional and no-till in sublayers.

Treatment
STe0
Outcome
fungale0
Direction
highere0
Value
28%–43%e0
Comparator
CT and NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ST again displayed higher levels of fungal and total MNC by 28%–43% and 23%–34%, respectively, than CT and NT in sublayers (> 5 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strategic tillage had 23%–34% higher total microbial necromass carbon than conventional and no-till in sublayers.

Treatment
STe0
Outcome
total MNCe0
Direction
highere0
Value
23%–34%e0
Comparator
CT and NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ST again displayed higher levels of fungal and total MNC by 28%–43% and 23%–34%, respectively, than CT and NT in sublayers (> 5 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both strategic tillage and no-till significantly improved the soil quality index compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
ST and NTe0
Outcome
soil quality indexe0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ST and NT significantly outperformed CT in terms of soil quality index and corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both strategic tillage and no-till significantly improved corn yields compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
ST and NTe0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ST and NT significantly outperformed CT in terms of soil quality index and corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1331 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend strategic tillage to improve soil quality and accumulate plant and microbial molecules in Mollisol.

Outcome
STe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ST could be recommended as a promising option to alleviate the limitations of no‐till farming by accumulating plant and microbial molecules and improving soil quality in a Mollisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1331 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

tillage · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 68 positive, 14 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

tillage · quality: phytochemicals · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.