Paper · 2026 · Plants

Changes in Plant Nitrogen Resorption During Restoration in Inner Mongolia, China

Xiang Li; Takafumi Miyasaka; Hao Qu

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tree and shrub planting is a widely used strategy to restore degraded semi-arid grasslands. Although nutrient resorption is a key adaptation to nutrient-limited environments, its dynamics at decadal scales remain poorly understood. In this study, we measured species-averaged nitrogen resorption efficiency (NRE) at both community and functional group levels, together with soil nutrients, across 20- and 40-year shrub-planted sites and a 40-year tree-planted site in Inner Mongolia, China. At the community level, green and senesced leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations, NRE, and aboveground biomass did not differ significantly among sites. However, clear differences emerged at the functional group level: Poaceae exhibited higher NRE than forbs and lower senesced leaf N than both forbs and Fabaceae. As restoration progressed, Poaceae replaced forbs as the dominant group, coinciding with increased soil nutrient availability. Notably, NRE in Poaceae declined with increasing soil nutrients, suggesting a shift toward greater reliance on direct soil nutrient uptake. This shift, combined with the production of low-nitrogen litter by dominant Poaceae species, may ultimately slow soil nutrient accumulation. Our findings highlight the importance of functional group dynamics in regulating long-term nutrient resorption and cycling and suggest that managing Poaceae dominance could enhance long-term soil nutrient enrichment and biodiversity in restored semi-arid grasslands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Community green leaf nitrogen concentration did not differ significantly among restoration sites.

Outcome
green and senesced leaf nitrogen (N) concentrationse0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At the community level, green and senesced leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations, NRE, and aboveground biomass did not differ significantly among sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Community senesced leaf nitrogen concentration did not differ significantly among sites.

Outcome
senesced leaf nitrogen (N) concentrationse0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At the community level, green and senesced leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations, NRE, and aboveground biomass did not differ significantly among sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Community nitrogen resorption efficiency did not differ significantly among sites.

Outcome
NREe0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At the community level, green and senesced leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations, NRE, and aboveground biomass did not differ significantly among sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Community aboveground biomass did not differ significantly among sites.

Outcome
aboveground biomasse0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At the community level, green and senesced leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations, NRE, and aboveground biomass did not differ significantly among sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poaceae had higher nitrogen resorption efficiency than forbs.

Taxon
PoaceaePoaceaee0
Outcome
NREe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
forbse0

Verbatim

e0

“Poaceae exhibited higher NRE than forbs and lower senesced leaf N than both forbs and Fabaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–799 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poaceae had lower senesced-leaf nitrogen than forbs and Fabaceae.

Taxon
PoaceaePoaceaee0
Outcome
senesced leaf Ne0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
forbs and Fabaceaee0

Verbatim

e0

“Poaceae exhibited higher NRE than forbs and lower senesced leaf N than both forbs and Fabaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–799 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poaceae replaced forbs as the dominant group during restoration.

Taxon
PoaceaePoaceaee0
Outcome
replaced forbs as the dominant groupe0
Qualifier
As restoration progressede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“As restoration progressed, Poaceae replaced forbs as the dominant group, coinciding with increased soil nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–926 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nutrient availability increased as restoration progressed.

Outcome
soil nutrient availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“As restoration progressed, Poaceae replaced forbs as the dominant group, coinciding with increased soil nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–926 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poaceae nitrogen resorption efficiency declined with increasing soil nutrients.

Taxon
PoaceaePoaceaee0
Outcome
NREe0
Direction
declinede0
Setting
soil nutrientse0

Not reportedCompound

Verbatim

e0

“NRE in Poaceae declined with increasing soil nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–991 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest greater reliance on direct soil nutrient uptake as Poaceae nitrogen resorption declines.

Taxon
PoaceaePoaceaee0
Outcome
direct soil nutrient uptakee0
Qualifier
greater reliancee0

Verbatim

e0

“NRE in Poaceae declined with increasing soil nutrients, suggesting a shift toward greater reliance on direct soil nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1066 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that Poaceae low-nitrogen litter and nutrient uptake may slow soil nutrient accumulation.

Taxon
PoaceaePoaceaee0
Outcome
soil nutrient accumulatione0
Direction
slowe0
Qualifier
production of low-nitrogen littere0

Verbatim

e0

“This shift, combined with the production of low-nitrogen litter by dominant Poaceae species, may ultimately slow soil nutrient accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1207 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest managing Poaceae dominance to improve nutrient enrichment and biodiversity in restored grasslands.

Taxon
PoaceaePoaceaee0
Outcome
managing Poaceae dominancee0
Qualifier
could enhance long-term soil nutrient enrichment and biodiversitye0

Verbatim

e0

“managing Poaceae dominance could enhance long-term soil nutrient enrichment and biodiversity in restored semi-arid grasslands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1474 · show in text ↑