Paper · 2026 · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

Sodium Nitroprusside Enhances Root Quality and Recovery in Radish Under Drought Stress

Juliane Maciel Henschel; Estephanni Fernanda Oliveira Dantas; Antônio Nunes de Andrade; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Drought is a major factor limiting food production worldwide, especially in the current climate change era. As such, strategies to mitigate drought stress in vegetables, such as radish, are paramount to ensure food security. Among these, the use of signaling molecules, such as the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP), are promising. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effects of SNP in the mitigation of drought stress and in the root quality of radish. For this, plants were grown under three irrigation regimes: irrigation with 80% WRC (well-watered), one week without irrigation (from 14 to 21 days after sowing (DAS)) with subsequent re-watering with 80% WRC (re-watered), and irrigation restriction from 21 to 28 DAS, without re-irrigation (drought). Plants were then sprayed with 100 µM SNP or water (control), and growth, physiological, and biochemical characteristics were evaluated. Irrigation was the main factor affecting radish growth and quality, with drought strongly decreasing carbon assimilation rate and plant growth, and re-watering not reversing these effects. SNP, in turn, did not affect radish growth, but improved storage root quality by increasing the content of total sugars and vitamin C. SNP was not able to mitigate drought stress effects in photosynthetic capacity and biomass production of radish; however, it improved stress recovery upon re-watering, increasing root dry mass and decreasing electrolyte leakage. Overall, this study provides novel evidence that preharvest SNP application improves radish root quality and stress recovery in a condition-dependent manner, highlighting its potential to enhance crop quality under water-limited conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought strongly decreased radish carbon assimilation.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
carbon assimilation ratee0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought strongly decreasing carbon assimilation rate and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1040 · show in text ↑
e1

“root quality of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought strongly decreased radish plant growth.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought strongly decreasing carbon assimilation rate and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1040 · show in text ↑
e1

“root quality of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering did not reverse the drought reductions.

Treatment
re-wateringe0
Outcome
carbon assimilation rate and plant growthe1
Direction
not reversinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“re-watering not reversing these effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1085 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought strongly decreasing carbon assimilation rate and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1040 · show in text ↑
e2

“root quality of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP did not affect radish growth.

Treatment
SNPe0
Outcome
radish growthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SNP, in turn, did not affect radish growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP increased total sugars in radish storage roots.

Organ / stage
storage roote0
Treatment
SNPe0
Outcome
content of total sugarse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SNP, in turn, did not affect radish growth, but improved storage root quality by increasing the content of total sugars and vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP increased vitamin C in radish storage roots.

Organ / stage
storage roote0
Treatment
SNPe0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SNP, in turn, did not affect radish growth, but improved storage root quality by increasing the content of total sugars and vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP did not mitigate drought effects on photosynthetic capacity.

Treatment
SNPe0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye0
Direction
not able to mitigatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SNP was not able to mitigate drought stress effects in photosynthetic capacity and biomass production of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP did not mitigate drought effects on biomass production.

Treatment
SNPe0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
not able to mitigatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SNP was not able to mitigate drought stress effects in photosynthetic capacity and biomass production of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During recovery after rewatering, SNP increased radish root dry mass.

Treatment
SNPe1
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
upon re-wateringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it improved stress recovery upon re-watering, increasing root dry mass and decreasing electrolyte leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1449 · show in text ↑
e1

“SNP was not able to mitigate drought stress effects in photosynthetic capacity and biomass production of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During recovery after rewatering, SNP decreased radish electrolyte leakage.

Treatment
SNPe1
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
decreasinge0
Qualifier
upon re-wateringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it improved stress recovery upon re-watering, increasing root dry mass and decreasing electrolyte leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1449 · show in text ↑
e1

“SNP was not able to mitigate drought stress effects in photosynthetic capacity and biomass production of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1333 · show in text ↑

sodium nitroprusside · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results differ

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.