Paper · 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Effects of biochar on the root morphological and mechanical properties of Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. on slopes in high-altitude areas

Yue, Kong; Xiao, Tan; Junzhuo, Li; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To investigate the effects of biochar on the root growth and soil reinforcement capacity of slope vegetation in high-altitude regions, in this study, Yajiang County, Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province, was selected as the experimental area, and Lespedeza bicolor was selected as the research object. Six biochar application gradients were established: 0 kg·m-2 (CK), 2.5 kg·m-2 (I), 5 kg·m-2 (II), 7.5 kg·m-2 (III), 10 kg·m-2 (IV), and 12.5 kg·m-2 (V). The effects of different application rates on the soil physical and chemical properties, root morphology, chemical composition, and tensile strength of L. bicolor were systematically analyzed. The results indicated that the biochar application rate significantly affected the root morphological and mechanical properties. Under Treatment III (7.5 kg·m-2), the root length, root biomass, total root length, and specific root length of L. bicolor were significantly greater than those under the other treatments. Moreover, this treatment resulted in the highest tensile strength of the secondary lateral roots, which was accompanied by an increase in cellulose content and a decrease in lignin content. Root tensile strength was positively correlated with cellulose content and negatively correlated with lignin content. In conclusion, an appropriate amount of biochar can promote root development and increase its tensile strength by improving soil conditions and regulating root chemical composition. Among the tested concentrations, 7.5 kg·m-2 was the optimal biochar application rate for enhancing the soil reinforcement capacity of the roots of L. bicolor in this region. This study provides theoretical support and a practical reference for slope ecological restoration in high-altitude areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application rate significantly affected root morphological and mechanical properties.

Taxon
Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.Lespedeza bicolort0
Treatment
biochar application ratee0
Outcome
root morphological and mechanical propertiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lespedeza bicolor
Lespedeza bicolor · Taxonuser:Miya.m · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the biochar application rate significantly affected the root morphological and mechanical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 7.5 kg·m-2, root length, root biomass, total root length and specific root length exceeded those under other treatments.

Taxon
Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.Lespedeza bicolort0
Treatment
Treatment III (7.5 kg·m-2)e0
Outcome
root length, root biomass, total root length, and specific root lengthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lespedeza bicolor
Lespedeza bicolor · Taxonuser:Miya.m · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under Treatment III (7.5 kg·m-2), the root length, root biomass, total root length, and specific root length of L. bicolor were significantly greater than those under the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment III produced the highest secondary lateral root tensile strength.

Taxon
Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.Lespedeza bicolort0
Treatment
Treatment III (7.5 kg·m-2)e1
Outcome
tensile strength of the secondary lateral rootse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lespedeza bicolor
Lespedeza bicolor · Taxonuser:Miya.m · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment resulted in the highest tensile strength of the secondary lateral roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under Treatment III (7.5 kg·m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment III increased root cellulose content.

Taxon
Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.Lespedeza bicolort0
Treatment
Treatment III (7.5 kg·m-2)e1
Outcome
cellulose contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lespedeza bicolor
Lespedeza bicolor · Taxonuser:Miya.m · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment resulted in the highest tensile strength of the secondary lateral roots, which was accompanied by an increase in cellulose content and a decrease in lignin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under Treatment III (7.5 kg·m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment III decreased root lignin content.

Taxon
Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.Lespedeza bicolort0
Treatment
Treatment III (7.5 kg·m-2)e1
Outcome
lignin contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lespedeza bicolor
Lespedeza bicolor · Taxonuser:Miya.m · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in lignin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under Treatment III (7.5 kg·m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root tensile strength was positively correlated with cellulose content.

Taxon
Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.Lespedeza bicolort0
Compound
cellulosee0
Outcome
Root tensile strengthe0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lespedeza bicolor
Lespedeza bicolor · Taxonuser:Miya.m · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root tensile strength was positively correlated with cellulose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root tensile strength was negatively correlated with lignin content.

Taxon
Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.Lespedeza bicolort0
Compound
lignine0
Outcome
Root tensile strengthe0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lespedeza bicolor
Lespedeza bicolor · Taxonuser:Miya.m · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root tensile strength was positively correlated with cellulose content and negatively correlated with lignin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified 7.5 kg·m-2 as the optimal biochar rate for root soil reinforcement in this region.

Taxon
Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.Lespedeza bicolort0
Outcome
optimal biochar application rate for enhancing the soil reinforcement capacitye0
Value
7.5 kg·m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lespedeza bicolor
Lespedeza bicolor · Taxonuser:Miya.m · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“7.5 kg·m-2 was the optimal biochar application rate for enhancing the soil reinforcement capacity of the roots of L. bicolor in this region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑