Paper · 2026 · Agronomy

Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Effects on Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Common Bean

Taine Teotonio Teixeira da Rocha; Adriano Teodoro Bruzi; Márcia Rufini; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Common bean grain yield is strongly influenced by nitrogen availability and can be improved through biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), which among cultivars and Rhizobium strains. This study evaluated the BNF ability of 15 common bean cultivars and their symbiotic performance with three Rhizobium strains, including a strain authorized by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, to identify variability for breeding strategies and select promising inoculants. A greenhouse experiment was carried out, and data were subjected to variance analysis, with means compared by the Scott–Knott test at 5% probability. A partial diallel analysis was also performed to estimate general and specific combining ability. Based on these results, seven cultivars and two strains (UFLA 02-100 and CIAT 899) were selected for field evaluation. BNF was influenced by genotype, strain, and genotype × strain interaction, and traits related to BNF were controlled by both additive and non-additive genetic effects. Inoculation with Rhizobium promoted grain yield comparable to nitrogen fertilization. The cultivar BRSMG Zape showed superior grain yield and high general combining ability, indicating its potential for breeding programs aimed at improving BNF. The strain UFLA 02-100 resulted in higher grain yield than the reference strain CIAT 899, suggesting its potential as a recommended inoculant for common bean production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BNF varied with genotype, strain and their interaction.

Taxon
Common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
genotypee0
Interactor
straine0symbiont
Outcome
BNFe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BNF was influenced by genotype, strain, and genotype × strain interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BNF traits had both additive and nonadditive genetic effects.

Taxon
Common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
traits related to BNFe0
Qualifier
both additive and non-additive genetic effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“traits related to BNF were controlled by both additive and non-additive genetic effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation yielded grain comparable to nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
Common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Inoculation with Rhizobiume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Rhizobium promoted grain yield comparable to nitrogen fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRSMG Zape showed superior grain yield.

Taxon
Common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
BRSMG Zapee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar BRSMG Zape showed superior grain yield and high general combining ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRSMG Zape had high general combining ability.

Taxon
Common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
BRSMG Zapee0
Outcome
general combining abilitye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar BRSMG Zape showed superior grain yield and high general combining ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UFLA 02-100 yielded more grain than CIAT 899.

Taxon
Common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
UFLA 02-100e0
Interactor
UFLA 02-100e0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CIAT 899e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strain UFLA 02-100 resulted in higher grain yield than the reference strain CIAT 899”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest UFLA 02-100 as an inoculant for common bean production.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Outcome
recommended inoculant for common bean productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting its potential as a recommended inoculant for common bean production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1410 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.