Paper · 2026 · Scientific Reports

Plant spacing modulates growth, yield and nutrient dynamics of sponge gourd under semi-arid conditions

Syed Mohsin Abbas; Raina Ijaz; Tanveer Hussain; et al.

17
claims
49
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

With the global population steadily rising and arable land shrinking, enhancing per-unit area productivity has become a critical challenge, particularly in semi-arid regions where resource limitations further constrain crop yields. Sponge gourd (Luffa aegyptiaca L.), a nutrient-rich summer vegetable, often underperforms in such environments due to unoptimized planting geometry. This two-year field study evaluated the influence of intra-row spacing (1 ft vs. 2 ft) on the vegetative growth, reproductive traits, chlorophyll fluorescence, and nutrient uptake of sponge gourd cv. Advanta, grown in sandy loam soils of Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Closer spacing (1 ft) significantly improved germination by 8.1%, seedling vigor index by 15.9%, plant height by 12%, leaf area index by 58.3%, and crop growth rate by 79.8% compared to wider spacing. It also increased female flower percentage (18.1%), flower diameter (21.4%), fruit set (31.4%), fruit diameter (20.8%), and fruits per plant (55%). Consequently, fruit yield was about 28.1% higher under 1 ft spacing. Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake increased by 12.2% and 19.2%, respectively, with corresponding improvements in nutrient uptake efficiency. In contrast, wider spacing (2 ft) enhanced photosynthetic performance, with increases in quantum yield (9%) and linear electron flow (3.5%). In conclusion, closer intra-row spacing is a practical strategy to meet future food demands by maximizing land use efficiency in cucurbit cultivation. Future work should investigate spacing-nutrient interactions over multiple locations to ensure sustainability in closer intra-row spacing systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing significantly improved sponge gourd germination by 8.1% compared with wider spacing.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e1
Outcome
germinatione1
Direction
improvede1
Value
8.1%e1
Comparator
wider spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Closer spacing (1 ft) significantly improved germination by 8.1%, seedling vigor index by 15.9%, plant height by 12%, leaf area index by 58.3%, and crop growth rate by 79.8% compared to wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing significantly improved sponge gourd seedling vigor index by 15.9% compared with wider spacing.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e1
Outcome
seedling vigor indexe1
Direction
improvede1
Value
15.9%e1
Comparator
wider spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Closer spacing (1 ft) significantly improved germination by 8.1%, seedling vigor index by 15.9%, plant height by 12%, leaf area index by 58.3%, and crop growth rate by 79.8% compared to wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing significantly improved sponge gourd plant height by 12% compared with wider spacing.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
improvede1
Value
12%e1
Comparator
wider spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Closer spacing (1 ft) significantly improved germination by 8.1%, seedling vigor index by 15.9%, plant height by 12%, leaf area index by 58.3%, and crop growth rate by 79.8% compared to wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing significantly improved sponge gourd leaf area index by 58.3% compared with wider spacing.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e1
Outcome
leaf area indexe1
Direction
improvede1
Value
58.3%e1
Comparator
wider spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Closer spacing (1 ft) significantly improved germination by 8.1%, seedling vigor index by 15.9%, plant height by 12%, leaf area index by 58.3%, and crop growth rate by 79.8% compared to wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing significantly improved sponge gourd crop growth rate by 79.8% compared with wider spacing.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e1
Outcome
crop growth ratee1
Direction
improvede1
Value
79.8%e1
Comparator
wider spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Closer spacing (1 ft) significantly improved germination by 8.1%, seedling vigor index by 15.9%, plant height by 12%, leaf area index by 58.3%, and crop growth rate by 79.8% compared to wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing increased sponge gourd female flower percentage by 18.1% compared with wider spacing.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e2
Outcome
female flower percentagee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
18.1%e1
Comparator
wider spacinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“It also increased female flower percentage (18.1%), flower diameter (21.4%), fruit set (31.4%), fruit diameter (20.8%), and fruits per plant (55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–993 · show in text ↑
e2

“Closer spacing (1 ft)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–667 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing increased sponge gourd flower diameter by 21.4% compared with wider spacing.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e2
Outcome
flower diametere1
Direction
increasede1
Value
21.4%e1
Comparator
wider spacinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“It also increased female flower percentage (18.1%), flower diameter (21.4%), fruit set (31.4%), fruit diameter (20.8%), and fruits per plant (55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–993 · show in text ↑
e2

“Closer spacing (1 ft)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–667 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing increased sponge gourd fruit set by 31.4% compared with wider spacing.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e2
Outcome
fruit sete1
Direction
increasede1
Value
31.4%e1
Comparator
wider spacinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“It also increased female flower percentage (18.1%), flower diameter (21.4%), fruit set (31.4%), fruit diameter (20.8%), and fruits per plant (55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–993 · show in text ↑
e2

“Closer spacing (1 ft)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–667 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing increased sponge gourd fruit diameter by 20.8% compared with wider spacing.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e2
Outcome
fruit diametere1
Direction
increasede1
Value
20.8%e1
Comparator
wider spacinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“It also increased female flower percentage (18.1%), flower diameter (21.4%), fruit set (31.4%), fruit diameter (20.8%), and fruits per plant (55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–993 · show in text ↑
e2

“Closer spacing (1 ft)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–667 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing increased the number of sponge gourd fruits per plant by 55% compared with wider spacing.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e2
Outcome
fruits per plante1
Direction
increasede1
Value
55%e1
Comparator
wider spacinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“It also increased female flower percentage (18.1%), flower diameter (21.4%), fruit set (31.4%), fruit diameter (20.8%), and fruits per plant (55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–993 · show in text ↑
e2

“Closer spacing (1 ft)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–667 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sponge gourd fruit yield was about 28.1% higher under 1 ft spacing.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
1 ft spacinge1
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
28.1%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit yield was about 28.1% higher under 1 ft spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing increased sponge gourd nitrogen uptake by 12.2%.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e2
Outcome
Nitrogen and phosphorus uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
12.2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake increased by 12.2% and 19.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1137 · show in text ↑
e2

“Closer spacing (1 ft)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing increased sponge gourd phosphorus uptake by 19.2%.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e2
Outcome
Nitrogen and phosphorus uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
19.2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake increased by 12.2% and 19.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1137 · show in text ↑
e2

“Closer spacing (1 ft)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 1 ft spacing came with corresponding improvements in sponge gourd nutrient uptake efficiency.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (1 ft)e2
Outcome
nutrient uptake efficiencye1
Direction
improvementse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“with corresponding improvements in nutrient uptake efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1200 · show in text ↑
e2

“Closer spacing (1 ft)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 2 ft spacing increased sponge gourd quantum yield by 9%.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
wider spacing (2 ft)e1
Outcome
quantum yielde2
Direction
increasese2
Value
9%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“wider spacing (2 ft)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1235 · show in text ↑
e2

“increases in quantum yield (9%) and linear electron flow (3.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 2 ft spacing increased sponge gourd linear electron flow by 3.5%.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Treatment
wider spacing (2 ft)e1
Outcome
linear electron flowe2
Direction
increasese2
Value
3.5%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“wider spacing (2 ft)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1235 · show in text ↑
e2

“increases in quantum yield (9%) and linear electron flow (3.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1341 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that closer intra-row spacing is a practical strategy to meet future food demands by maximizing land use efficiency in cucurbit cultivation.

Taxon
sponge gourdLuffa aegyptiacat0
Outcome
practical strategy to meet future food demandse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luffa aegyptiaca
Luffa aegyptiaca · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sponge gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“closer intra-row spacing is a practical strategy to meet future food demands by maximizing land use efficiency in cucurbit cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1492 · show in text ↑