Paper · 2026 · PLoS ONE

Fortified farm yard manure to bio-stimulate nutrient availability and production of Indian mustard

Mukesh Kumar Meena; Ram Swaroop Jat; Mohan Lal Dotaniya; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fortified farm yard manure (FYM) enriched with secondary and micronutrients were prepared, and its effects on mitigating the decline in soil health, nutrient availability, and yield levels in Indian mustard under calcareous soil were assessed. FYM at 10 tonnes ha-1 and FYM (500 kg ha-1) fortified with 20 kg S + 5 kg Zn + 2 kg B + 10 kg Fe significantly improved seed yield and growth parameters of mustard. However, the highest benefit-cost ratio (4.22) with a seed yield of 28.72 q ha-1 was obtained under the application of half dose of the recommended levels of secondary and micronutrient, i.e., 2.5 kg Zn + 1 kg B + 5 kg Fe + 10 g S enriched FYM 500 kg ha-1. This indicates that application of a balanced amount of micro and secondary nutrients through 500 kg FYM improved mustard yield and economic return to the farmers. Nutrient enrichment with micro and secondary nutrients at the rate of 5.0 kg Zn + 2 kg B + 10 kg Fe + 20 kg S enriched FYM @ 500 kg ha-1 significantly increased the soil microbial biomass carbon (56.46% SMB-C), soil organic carbon (SOC) (17.13%), and microbial biomass nitrogen (71.14% MBN) over the control. Moreover, nutrient fortification significantly improved the dehydrogenase activity (56.27%), alkaline phosphatase (101.44%) and aryl sulphatase (73.7%) in soil over control. The availability of S, Zn, Fe, and boron rose by 17.74%, 127.68%, 43.41%, and 52.76%, respectively, compared to the control. The utilization of FYM enriched with secondary and micronutrients at the rate of FYM 500 kg ha-1 is an effective technological strategy to improve soil health and production of Indian mustard in semi-arid environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 10 tonnes per hectare significantly improved seed yield and growth parameters of mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
FYM at 10 tonnes ha-1e1
Outcome
seed yield and growth parameterse1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“FYM at 10 tonnes ha-1 and FYM (500 kg ha-1) fortified with 20 kg S + 5 kg Zn + 2 kg B + 10 kg Fe significantly improved seed yield and growth parameters of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 500 kg per hectare fortified with secondary and micronutrients significantly improved seed yield and growth parameters of mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
FYM (500 kg ha-1) fortified with 20 kg S + 5 kg Zn + 2 kg B + 10 kg Fee1
Outcome
seed yield and growth parameterse1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“FYM at 10 tonnes ha-1 and FYM (500 kg ha-1) fortified with 20 kg S + 5 kg Zn + 2 kg B + 10 kg Fe significantly improved seed yield and growth parameters of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half-dose micro and secondary nutrient enriched FYM gave the highest benefit-cost ratio, 4.22.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
2.5 kg Zn + 1 kg B + 5 kg Fe + 10 g S enriched FYM 500 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4.22e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest benefit-cost ratio (4.22) with a seed yield of 28.72 q ha-1 was obtained under the application of half dose of the recommended levels of secondary and micronutrient, i.e., 2.5 kg Zn + 1 kg B + 5 kg Fe + 10 g S enriched FYM 500 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–664 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half-dose micro and secondary nutrient enriched FYM gave a seed yield of 28.72 q per hectare.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
2.5 kg Zn + 1 kg B + 5 kg Fe + 10 g S enriched FYM 500 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Value
28.72 q ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest benefit-cost ratio (4.22) with a seed yield of 28.72 q ha-1 was obtained under the application of half dose of the recommended levels of secondary and micronutrient, i.e., 2.5 kg Zn + 1 kg B + 5 kg Fe + 10 g S enriched FYM 500 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient enriched FYM significantly increased soil microbial biomass carbon over the control.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
5.0 kg Zn + 2 kg B + 10 kg Fe + 20 kg S enriched FYM @ 500 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
soil microbial biomass carbone1
Direction
increasede1
Value
56.46%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nutrient enrichment with micro and secondary nutrients at the rate of 5.0 kg Zn + 2 kg B + 10 kg Fe + 20 kg S enriched FYM @ 500 kg ha-1 significantly increased the soil microbial biomass carbon (56.46% SMB-C), soil organic carbon (SOC) (17.13%), and microbial biomass nitrogen (71.14% MBN) over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient enriched FYM significantly increased soil organic carbon over the control.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
5.0 kg Zn + 2 kg B + 10 kg Fe + 20 kg S enriched FYM @ 500 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
soil organic carbone1
Direction
increasede1
Value
17.13%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nutrient enrichment with micro and secondary nutrients at the rate of 5.0 kg Zn + 2 kg B + 10 kg Fe + 20 kg S enriched FYM @ 500 kg ha-1 significantly increased the soil microbial biomass carbon (56.46% SMB-C), soil organic carbon (SOC) (17.13%), and microbial biomass nitrogen (71.14% MBN) over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient enriched FYM significantly increased microbial biomass nitrogen over the control.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
5.0 kg Zn + 2 kg B + 10 kg Fe + 20 kg S enriched FYM @ 500 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
microbial biomass nitrogene1
Direction
increasede1
Value
71.14%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nutrient enrichment with micro and secondary nutrients at the rate of 5.0 kg Zn + 2 kg B + 10 kg Fe + 20 kg S enriched FYM @ 500 kg ha-1 significantly increased the soil microbial biomass carbon (56.46% SMB-C), soil organic carbon (SOC) (17.13%), and microbial biomass nitrogen (71.14% MBN) over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient fortification significantly improved soil dehydrogenase activity over control.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
nutrient fortificatione1
Outcome
dehydrogenase activitye1
Direction
improvede1
Value
56.27%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“nutrient fortification significantly improved the dehydrogenase activity (56.27%), alkaline phosphatase (101.44%) and aryl sulphatase (73.7%) in soil over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient fortification significantly improved soil alkaline phosphatase over control.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
nutrient fortificatione1
Outcome
alkaline phosphatasee1
Direction
improvede1
Value
101.44%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“nutrient fortification significantly improved the dehydrogenase activity (56.27%), alkaline phosphatase (101.44%) and aryl sulphatase (73.7%) in soil over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient fortification significantly improved soil aryl sulphatase over control.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
nutrient fortificatione1
Outcome
aryl sulphatasee1
Direction
improvede1
Value
73.7%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“nutrient fortification significantly improved the dehydrogenase activity (56.27%), alkaline phosphatase (101.44%) and aryl sulphatase (73.7%) in soil over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1311 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil availability of S rose by 17.74% compared with the control.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Outcome
availabilitye1
Direction
rosee1
Value
17.74%e1
Qualifier
Se1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“The availability of S, Zn, Fe, and boron rose by 17.74%, 127.68%, 43.41%, and 52.76%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1436 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil availability of Zn rose by 127.68% compared with the control.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Outcome
availabilitye1
Direction
rosee1
Value
127.68%e1
Qualifier
Zne1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“The availability of S, Zn, Fe, and boron rose by 17.74%, 127.68%, 43.41%, and 52.76%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1436 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil availability of Fe rose by 43.41% compared with the control.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Outcome
availabilitye1
Direction
rosee1
Value
43.41%e1
Qualifier
Fee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“The availability of S, Zn, Fe, and boron rose by 17.74%, 127.68%, 43.41%, and 52.76%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1436 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil availability of boron rose by 52.76% compared with the control.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Outcome
availabilitye1
Direction
rosee1
Value
52.76%e1
Qualifier
borone1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“The availability of S, Zn, Fe, and boron rose by 17.74%, 127.68%, 43.41%, and 52.76%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1436 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · soil: chemistry · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · soil: biology · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

139 papers: 138 positive, 1 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

135 papers more in this group

See all 139 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.