Paper · 2026 · Scientific Reports

Evaluating biochar’s potential to reduce nitrate leaching and enhance wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield under different nitrogen management practices

Mauz ul Haq; Zaryab Khan; Aman Nawaz; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Nitrate (NO₃-) leaching from alkaline coarse-textured agricultural soils is a major concern that reduces nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and limits crop productivity. Application of biochar has been found to improve soil fertility through nutrient retention when used with nitrogen fertilizer, however, its efficacy in coarse-textured alkaline soil is insufficiently explored. A greenhouse pot experiment was carried out comprising completely randomized design (CRD) with five treatments and three replicates (15 pots) to investigate the effects of biochar applied with N doses on NO3- leaching, N uptake and wheat yield. The treatments consisted of T1 (Control), T2 (Nitrogen 75 kg ha-1), T3 (Nitrogen 150 kg ha-1), T4 (2% biochar + Nitrogen 75 kg ha-1), and T5 (2% biochar + Nitrogen 150 kg ha-1). Biochar application had significantly reduced NO3- leaching compared to no biochar with T4 and T5 showing the lowest levels of NO3- losses. All the biochar applied treatments produced high grain yield, N uptake, and improved NUE in terms of treatments with no biochar applied. The decrease in NO₃- leaching was coupled with increased N retention in the soil and enhanced plant growth parameters. This research indicates that 2% biochar with 150 kg N ha-1 is the most effective treatment to ensure maximum wheat production and reduces NO₃-- leaching in alkaline coarse-textured soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar reduced nitrate leaching relative to no biochar, with T4 and T5 lowest.

Treatment
Biochar applicatione0
Outcome
NO3- leachinge0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
no biochare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar application had significantly reduced NO3- leaching compared to no biochar with T4 and T5 showing the lowest levels of NO3- losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar treatments increased wheat grain yield relative to treatments without biochar.

Treatment
biochar applied treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
treatments with no biochar appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the biochar applied treatments produced high grain yield, N uptake, and improved NUE in terms of treatments with no biochar applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar treatments increased nitrogen uptake relative to treatments without biochar.

Treatment
biochar applied treatmentse0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
treatments with no biochar appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the biochar applied treatments produced high grain yield, N uptake, and improved NUE in terms of treatments with no biochar applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar treatments improved nitrogen use efficiency relative to no biochar.

Treatment
biochar applied treatmentse0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
treatments with no biochar appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the biochar applied treatments produced high grain yield, N uptake, and improved NUE in terms of treatments with no biochar applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nitrate leaching coincided with increased soil nitrogen retention.

Outcome
N retention in the soile0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
decrease in NO₃- leachinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in NO₃- leaching was coupled with increased N retention in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nitrate leaching coincided with enhanced plant growth parameters.

Treatment
NO₃- leachinge0
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in NO₃- leaching was coupled with increased N retention in the soil and enhanced plant growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify 2% biochar with 150 kg N ha-1 as most effective for wheat production and nitrate reduction.

Treatment
2% biochar with 150 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
maximum wheat production and reduces NO₃-- leachinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2% biochar with 150 kg N ha-1 is the most effective treatment to ensure maximum wheat production and reduces NO₃-- leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑

biochar · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

biochar · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 111 positive, 10 negative or no effect

110 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

biochar · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.