Paper · 2026 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Long-term nutrient–water management strategies for improved productivity and soil health in rainfed guava cultivation

Yogesh Khokhar; Gobinder Singh; Jagdeep Singh; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rainfed guava cultivation often suffers from yield limitations, compromised fruit quality, and declining soil fertility, primarily due to excessive reliance on chemical fertilizers and suboptimal water management. Sustainable nutrient and water management strategies are therefore essential to enhance guava productivity while maintaining long-term soil health under rainfed conditions. The objective of the study was to evaluate the integrated effects of integrated nutrient management (INM), fertigation, and cover cropping on guava yield, fruit quality, and soil health under rainfed conditions. A field experiment was conducted using 13 different nutrient and irrigation management treatments, combining various levels of mineral fertilizers such as recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF), organic manures comprising of farm yard manure (FYM) and moong residue, and fertigation with irrigation regimes. The results revealed that integration of fertigation, FYM, and optimized irrigation significantly enhanced guava yield by 47.1% over the recommended application of mineral fertilizers and improved fruit quality. The adoption of INM improved soil health by increasing microbial biomass carbon, enhancing moisture retention, and increasing nutrient availability. The INM combined with deficit irrigation; that is, 70% of the evaporation replenishment (ER) significantly enhanced soil organic carbon (SOC) content and labile carbon fractions compared to 100% RDF. The carbon management index (CMI) in INM-based treatment with deficit irrigation was 28.12% higher, than the RDF along with conventional irrigation. Principal component analysis (PCA) identified microbial biomass carbon, DTPA-Zn, and soil pH as key indicators of soil quality, with the adoption of INM practices enhancing the soil quality index by 18.72% compared to RDF treatment. The findings of the study will help in sustainable guava production and environmental sustainability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation, FYM and optimized irrigation increased guava yield by 47.1% over recommended mineral fertilizer.

Treatment
integration of fertigation, FYM, and optimized irrigatione0
Outcome
guava yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
47.1%e0
Comparator
recommended application of mineral fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of fertigation, FYM, and optimized irrigation significantly enhanced guava yield by 47.1% over the recommended application of mineral fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation, FYM and optimized irrigation improved guava fruit quality.

Treatment
integration of fertigation, FYM, and optimized irrigatione0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
recommended application of mineral fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of fertigation, FYM, and optimized irrigation significantly enhanced guava yield by 47.1% over the recommended application of mineral fertilizers and improved fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management increased soil microbial biomass carbon.

Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
microbial biomass carbone0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adoption of INM improved soil health by increasing microbial biomass carbon, enhancing moisture retention, and increasing nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Long-term nutrient–water management strategies for improved productivity and soil health in rainfed guava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management enhanced soil moisture retention.

Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
moisture retentione0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adoption of INM improved soil health by increasing microbial biomass carbon, enhancing moisture retention, and increasing nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Long-term nutrient–water management strategies for improved productivity and soil health in rainfed guava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management increased soil nutrient availability.

Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
nutrient availabilitye0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adoption of INM improved soil health by increasing microbial biomass carbon, enhancing moisture retention, and increasing nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Long-term nutrient–water management strategies for improved productivity and soil health in rainfed guava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

INM with 70% evaporation replenishment increased soil organic carbon compared with 100% RDF.

Treatment
INM combined with deficit irrigation; that is, 70% of the evaporation replenishment (ER)e0
Outcome
soil organic carbon (SOC) contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
100% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“INM combined with deficit irrigation; that is, 70% of the evaporation replenishment (ER) significantly enhanced soil organic carbon (SOC) content and labile carbon fractions compared to 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Long-term nutrient–water management strategies for improved productivity and soil health in rainfed guava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

INM with 70% evaporation replenishment increased labile carbon fractions compared with 100% RDF.

Treatment
INM combined with deficit irrigation; that is, 70% of the evaporation replenishment (ER)e0
Outcome
labile carbon fractionse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
100% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“INM combined with deficit irrigation; that is, 70% of the evaporation replenishment (ER) significantly enhanced soil organic carbon (SOC) content and labile carbon fractions compared to 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Long-term nutrient–water management strategies for improved productivity and soil health in rainfed guava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The carbon management index was 28.12% higher under INM and deficit irrigation than under RDF and conventional irrigation.

Treatment
INM-based treatment with deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
carbon management index (CMI)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
28.12%e0
Comparator
RDF along with conventional irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The carbon management index (CMI) in INM-based treatment with deficit irrigation was 28.12% higher, than the RDF along with conventional irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Long-term nutrient–water management strategies for improved productivity and soil health in rainfed guava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA identified microbial biomass carbon, DTPA-Zn and soil pH as key soil-quality indicators.

Outcome
key indicators of soil qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Principal component analysis (PCA) identified microbial biomass carbon, DTPA-Zn, and soil pH as key indicators of soil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Long-term nutrient–water management strategies for improved productivity and soil health in rainfed guava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INM increased the soil quality index by 18.72% compared with RDF.

Treatment
INM practicese0
Outcome
soil quality indexe0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
18.72%e0
Comparator
RDF treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the adoption of INM practices enhancing the soil quality index by 18.72% compared to RDF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Long-term nutrient–water management strategies for improved productivity and soil health in rainfed guava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 74 positive, 2 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.