Paper · 2021 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Response of guava to integrated nutrient and water management

Manpreet Singh Preet; Rajesh Kumar; V.P. Singh; et al.

14
claims
37
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Micro irrigation and fertigation supplemented with plastic mulch has proven to be the best to mitigate water scarcity. Calibrated systems and calculative irrigation and fertigation doses were tested for studying the effciency of provided water and nutrients under different mulching treatments in guava cv VNR Bihi. The experiment was executed at Horticulture Research Center of G.B.P.U.A&T Pantnagar, during the years 2017 and 2018. The experimental plants of four years old were irrigated as well as fertigated with a drip system having four emitters per plant of eight litre/hour (LPH) capacity. Three levels each of drip irrigation (100%, 80% and 60% CPE) and fertigation (100%, 80% and 60% RDF) and two levels of mulching (with and without use of silver-black plastic mulching 100 µ) were set for the experiment. Among the different levels of irrigation and fertigation, 100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulch improved the yield (52.55 kg/tree), no of fruits per plant (89.77), fruit weight (585.36 g), TSS (10.57 ºB), ascorbic acid (267.13 mg/100g), total sugars (7.78%) and leaf N (1.49%), P (0.46%), K (0.80%) and Zn (65.37 ppm) contents. WUE and FUE were 72.71 kg.ha−1.mm−1 and 84.87 kg/ha, respectively. Treatment combinations of mulching with drip irrigation at 60% CPE along with 100 RDF revealed the highest WUE of 81.83 kg.ha−1 mm−1. Similarly. treatment combination of mulching with drip irrigation at 80% CPE and 60% RDF recorded FUE to the tune of 107.11 kg.ha−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF, drip at 80% CPE and silver-black mulch treatment improved guava yield (52.55 kg/tree).

Material
VNR Bihie0
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulche1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Value
52.55 kg/treee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulch improved the yield (52.55 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF, drip at 80% CPE and silver-black mulch treatment improved guava no of fruits per plant (89.77).

Material
VNR Bihie0
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulche1
Outcome
no of fruits per plante2
Direction
improvede1
Value
89.77e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulch improved the yield (52.55 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“no of fruits per plant (89.77)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF, drip at 80% CPE and silver-black mulch treatment improved guava fruit weight (585.36 g).

Material
VNR Bihie0
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulche1
Outcome
fruit weighte2
Direction
improvede1
Value
585.36 ge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulch improved the yield (52.55 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruit weight (585.36 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF, drip at 80% CPE and silver-black mulch treatment improved guava TSS (10.57 ºB).

Material
VNR Bihie0
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulche1
Outcome
TSSe2
Direction
improvede1
Value
10.57 ºBe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulch improved the yield (52.55 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“TSS (10.57 ºB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF, drip at 80% CPE and silver-black mulch treatment improved guava ascorbic acid (267.13 mg/100g).

Material
VNR Bihie0
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulche1
Outcome
ascorbic acide2
Direction
improvede1
Value
267.13 mg/100ge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulch improved the yield (52.55 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“ascorbic acid (267.13 mg/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF, drip at 80% CPE and silver-black mulch treatment improved guava total sugars (7.78%).

Material
VNR Bihie0
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulche1
Outcome
total sugarse2
Direction
improvede1
Value
7.78%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulch improved the yield (52.55 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“total sugars (7.78%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF, drip at 80% CPE and silver-black mulch treatment improved guava leaf N (1.49%).

Material
VNR Bihie0
Organ / stage
leafe2
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulche1
Outcome
leaf Ne2
Direction
improvede1
Value
1.49%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulch improved the yield (52.55 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf N (1.49%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF, drip at 80% CPE and silver-black mulch treatment improved guava P (0.46%).

Material
VNR Bihie0
Organ / stage
leafe2
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulche1
Outcome
Pe2
Direction
improvede1
Value
0.46%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulch improved the yield (52.55 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf N (1.49%), P (0.46%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF, drip at 80% CPE and silver-black mulch treatment improved guava K (0.80%).

Material
VNR Bihie0
Organ / stage
leafe2
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulche1
Outcome
Ke2
Direction
improvede1
Value
0.80%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulch improved the yield (52.55 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf N (1.49%), P (0.46%), K (0.80%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF, drip at 80% CPE and silver-black mulch treatment improved guava Zn (65.37 ppm).

Material
VNR Bihie0
Organ / stage
leafe2
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulche1
Outcome
Zne2
Direction
improvede1
Value
65.37 ppme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with drip irrigation at 80% (CPE) along with Silver-black plastic mulch improved the yield (52.55 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf N (1.49%), P (0.46%), K (0.80%) and Zn (65.37 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1220 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava water use efficiency (WUE) was 72.71 kg.ha−1.mm−1.

Outcome
WUEe3
Value
72.71 kg.ha−1.mm−1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e3

“WUE and FUE were 72.71 kg.ha−1.mm−1 and 84.87 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1296 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) was 84.87 kg/ha.

Outcome
FUEe3
Value
84.87 kg/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e3

“WUE and FUE were 72.71 kg.ha−1.mm−1 and 84.87 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with drip irrigation at 60% CPE along with 100% RDF gave the highest guava WUE (81.83 kg.ha−1 mm−1).

Treatment
mulching with drip irrigation at 60% CPE along with 100 RDFe4
Outcome
WUEe4
Direction
higheste4
Value
81.83 kg.ha−1 mm−1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e4

“Treatment combinations of mulching with drip irrigation at 60% CPE along with 100 RDF revealed the highest WUE of 81.83 kg.ha−1 mm−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with drip irrigation at 80% CPE and 60% RDF recorded guava FUE of 107.11 kg.ha−1.

Treatment
mulching with drip irrigation at 80% CPE and 60% RDFe5
Outcome
FUEe5
Value
107.11 kg.ha−1e5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guava cv VNR Bihi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–314 · show in text ↑
e5

“treatment combination of mulching with drip irrigation at 80% CPE and 60% RDF recorded FUE to the tune of 107.11 kg.ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1563 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 74 positive, 2 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.