Abstract
Biostimulants, as a category of biological agents containing microbial inoculants and active substances, are emerging as a promising solution in the field of saline-alkali land bioremediation. Su100 is a novel endophytic fungus belonging to the genus Mollisia , whose functions have not yet been extensively deciphered. In this study, we found Su100 fermentation broth (SFB) significantly enhanced grain yield of 'Yannong 1212’, 'Jimai 22’, 'Jimai 60’, and 'Hangmai 802’ by 68.30, 27.89, 14.73, and 25.51%, respectively. Moreover, the nutritional quality and processing quality in the grains of 'Yannong 1212’ were also significantly improved, indicating that SFB could synergistically enhance both the yield and quality of wheat. Further physiological and transcriptomic analysis of root suggested that SFB mitigates saline-alkali stress by enhancing N and P uptake and remodeling phenylpropanoid and fatty acid metabolism. Our study elucidates the function of Mollisia fungi and supports the development of microbial-based biostimulants for sustainable agriculture.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Su100 fermentation broth significantly enhanced Yannong 1212 grain yield by 68.30%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Yannong 1212e0
- Treatment
- Su100 fermentation brothe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 68.30e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In this study, we found Su100 fermentation broth (SFB) significantly enhanced grain yield of 'Yannong 1212’, 'Jimai 22’, 'Jimai 60’, and 'Hangmai 802’ by 68.30, 27.89, 14.73, and 25.51%, respectively.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Su100 fermentation broth significantly enhanced Jimai 22 grain yield by 27.89%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Jimai 22e0
- Treatment
- Su100 fermentation brothe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 27.89e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In this study, we found Su100 fermentation broth (SFB) significantly enhanced grain yield of 'Yannong 1212’, 'Jimai 22’, 'Jimai 60’, and 'Hangmai 802’ by 68.30, 27.89, 14.73, and 25.51%, respectively.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Su100 fermentation broth significantly enhanced Jimai 60 grain yield by 14.73%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Jimai 60e0
- Treatment
- Su100 fermentation brothe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 14.73e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In this study, we found Su100 fermentation broth (SFB) significantly enhanced grain yield of 'Yannong 1212’, 'Jimai 22’, 'Jimai 60’, and 'Hangmai 802’ by 68.30, 27.89, 14.73, and 25.51%, respectively.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Su100 fermentation broth significantly enhanced Hangmai 802 grain yield by 25.51%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Hangmai 802e0
- Treatment
- Su100 fermentation brothe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 25.51%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In this study, we found Su100 fermentation broth (SFB) significantly enhanced grain yield of 'Yannong 1212’, 'Jimai 22’, 'Jimai 60’, and 'Hangmai 802’ by 68.30, 27.89, 14.73, and 25.51%, respectively.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
SFB significantly improved nutritional and processing quality of Yannong 1212 grains.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Material
- Yannong 1212e0
- Organ / stage
- grainse0
- Treatment
- SFBe0
- Outcome
- nutritional quality and processing qualitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Moreover, the nutritional quality and processing quality in the grains of 'Yannong 1212’ were also significantly improved, indicating that SFB could synergistically enhance both the yield and quality of wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Root analyses suggest that SFB mitigates saline-alkali stress by enhancing N and P uptake.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Organ / stage
- roote0
- Treatment
- SFBe0
- Outcome
- N and P uptakee0
- Direction
- enhancinge0
- Qualifier
- saline-alkali stresse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Further physiological and transcriptomic analysis of root suggested that SFB mitigates saline-alkali stress by enhancing N and P uptake and remodeling phenylpropanoid and fatty acid metabolism.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Root analyses suggest that SFB mitigates saline-alkali stress through remodeling phenylpropanoid and fatty acid metabolism.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Organ / stage
- roote0
- Treatment
- SFBe0
- Outcome
- saline-alkali stresse0
- Direction
- mitigatese0
- Qualifier
- remodeling phenylpropanoid and fatty acid metabolisme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Further physiological and transcriptomic analysis of root suggested that SFB mitigates saline-alkali stress by enhancing N and P uptake and remodeling phenylpropanoid and fatty acid metabolism.”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
processing · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →processing · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.