Paper · 2026 · Plant Cell & Environment

Lack of Hydraulic Acclimation in Response to Multiple Droughts and Recovery

Jaycie C. Fickle; Kelly L. Kerr; Lillie I. Congram; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Human-caused climate change is expected to bring more frequent and extended droughts with shorter wet periods of relief in between for many regions of the world. Critical knowledge gaps remain around the extent to which tree species can acclimate physiologically to repeated droughts. Using a common garden experiment with saplings of the widespread and ecologically important trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides), we studied how repeat drought and recovery treatments impact plant functional traits and physiological responses. We utilised four treatments over the course of 3 years: a continuous control, a three consecutive drought year treatment, a two consecutive drought year treatment, and a treatment with two drought years with a well-watered recovery year in between. Trees that experienced a recovery period between two drought treatments exhibited less drought resilience compared to both the two and three-consecutive-year treatments. Trees in the recovery treatment also exhibited lower growth rates and increased xylem damage in their older rings. Additionally, we observed no evidence of hydraulic acclimation to severe drought over time. These findings indicate that, during severe and repeated droughts, aspen saplings are likely to experience increases in hydraulic vulnerability, and wet periods between droughts are not likely to improve overall drought responses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A recovery year between two droughts gave trees less drought resilience than consecutive drought treatments.

Taxon
trembling aspene0
Treatment
a recovery period between two drought treatmentse1
Outcome
drought resiliencee1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
two and three-consecutive-year treatmentse1

Verbatim

e0

“trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trees that experienced a recovery period between two drought treatments exhibited less drought resilience compared to both the two and three-consecutive-year treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery treatment reduced tree growth rates.

Taxon
trembling aspene0
Treatment
recovery treatmente1
Outcome
growth ratese1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trees in the recovery treatment also exhibited lower growth rates and increased xylem damage in their older rings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1063 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery treatment increased xylem damage in older rings.

Taxon
trembling aspene0
Organ / stage
older ringse1
Treatment
recovery treatmente1
Outcome
xylem damagee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trees in the recovery treatment also exhibited lower growth rates and increased xylem damage in their older rings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1063 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No hydraulic acclimation to severe drought was detected over time.

Taxon
trembling aspene0
Treatment
severe droughte1
Outcome
hydraulic acclimatione1
Direction
no evidencee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“we observed no evidence of hydraulic acclimation to severe drought over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer severe repeated drought raises hydraulic vulnerability.

Taxon
trembling aspene0
Treatment
severe and repeated droughtse1
Outcome
hydraulic vulnerabilitye1
Direction
increasese1
Qualifier
likelye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“during severe and repeated droughts, aspen saplings are likely to experience increases in hydraulic vulnerability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1299 · show in text ↑