Paper · 2026 · European Journal of Soil Biology

Mycorrhizal inoculum–mediated modulation of maize–rhizosphere interactions under pesticide stress

Anna Manukyan; Alexandre Pedrinho; Panagiotis A. Karas; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and synthetic pesticides are frequently applied together in conventional agriculture, yet their interactive effects remain largely understudied. This gap limits our understanding of whether co-application leads to synergistic benefits or unintended antagonistic impacts on soil function and plant performance. This study evaluated the effects of the co-application of a Funneliformis mosseae inoculum together with three commonly used pesticides - fungicide pyraclostrobin, and the herbicides tembotrione, and clopyralid - on the growth of maize ( Zea mays ) plants, AMF colonization levels and AMF community composition under controlled greenhouse conditions. Using a full-factorial design, we assessed whether the AMF inoculum could buffer pesticide-induced disruptions in plant and fungal growth parameters and soil functions. The F. mosseae inoculum did not consistently mitigate pesticide stress on plant performance but significantly enhanced pesticide dissipation and modulated rhizosphere phosphatase activity. Amplicon sequencing revealed that the inoculum shaped AMF community composition, promoting resilience in the rhizosphere. Root-associated communities remained more vulnerable to chemical disturbance. These findings highlight that while AMF can influence pesticide fate and AMF diversity, their capacity to buffer against pesticide impacts on plant performance is limited and strongly context dependent. This underscores the need to tailor the use of biostimulants to specific chemical regimes, when aiming to improve soil resilience and crop productivity in intensively managed systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae inoculation did not consistently mitigate pesticide stress on plant performance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
F. mosseae inoculume0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
plant performancee0
Direction
did not consistently mitigatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The F. mosseae inoculum did not consistently mitigate pesticide stress on plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae inoculation significantly enhanced pesticide dissipation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
F. mosseae inoculume0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
pesticide dissipatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The F. mosseae inoculum did not consistently mitigate pesticide stress on plant performance but significantly enhanced pesticide dissipation and modulated rhizosphere phosphatase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae inoculation modulated rhizosphere phosphatase activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
F. mosseae inoculume0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
rhizosphere phosphatase activitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The F. mosseae inoculum did not consistently mitigate pesticide stress on plant performance but significantly enhanced pesticide dissipation and modulated rhizosphere phosphatase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculum shaped AMF community composition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
the inoculume0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
AMF community compositione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amplicon sequencing revealed that the inoculum shaped AMF community composition, promoting resilience in the rhizosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-associated communities were more vulnerable to chemical disturbance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Root-associated communitiese0
Direction
more vulnerablee0
Qualifier
chemical disturbancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root-associated communities remained more vulnerable to chemical disturbance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend tailoring biostimulants to specific chemical regimes for soil resilience and crop productivity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
tailor the use of biostimulants to specific chemical regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This underscores the need to tailor the use of biostimulants to specific chemical regimes, when aiming to improve soil resilience and crop productivity in intensively managed systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1640 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 117 positive, 12 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.