Paper · 1993 · Journal of Animal Science

Effects of hybrid and ensiling with and without a microbial inoculant on the nutritional characteristics of whole-plant corn

C. W. Hunt; W. Kezar; D. D. Hinman; et al.

13
claims
35
verbatim quotes
84
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two corn hybrids (Pioneer 3377 and 3389) with similar total plant and grain yield characteristics were evaluated to determine potential differences in nutritive value of the whole plant and stover. Hybrids were grown in plots at four different locations in Idaho in 1988 and 1989 for laboratory evaluation. Samples from the plots were stored fresh or ensiled with or without a microbial inoculant for 60 d in laboratory silos. Whole-plant samples of 3377 had a lower (P < .01) percentage of NDF (42.7 vs 48.1), ADF (26.3 vs 30), hemicellulose (16.2 vs 18.2), cellulose (21.4 vs 24), and lignin (3.4 vs 3.8). Similar differences, but of larger magnitude, were observed in stover samples. Ruminal in situ (24 h) and two-stage IVDMD of whole-plant and stover samples were greater (P < .01) for 3377 than for 3389. Lower fiber content and greater degradability for 3377 was not due to greater grain content; 3377 actually had numerically lower grain as a percentage of whole plant than 3389 (41 vs 44). Ensiling reduced (P < .05) NDF, hemicellulose, and cellulose content compared with fresh samples; however, no effect (P > .10) due to inoculant was noted. Hybrid x storage interactions were not observed (P > .10). Inoculation and hybrid did not affect (P > .10) organic acid concentration of the silages. In 1989 silages from 3377 and 3389 were harvested to evaluate diets containing 65% (DM basis) corn silage in steer digestion and growth trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant samples of corn hybrid 3377 had lower NDF percentage than hybrid 3389 (42.7 vs 48.1; P < .01).

Material
3377e0
Outcome
NDFe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
42.7 vs 48.1e0
Comparator
3389e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant samples of 3377 had a lower (P < .01) percentage of NDF (42.7 vs 48.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–509 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pioneer 3377 and 3389”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–39 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant samples of hybrid 3377 had lower ADF than hybrid 3389 (26.3 vs 30; P < .01).

Material
3377e0
Outcome
ADFe3
Direction
lowere0
Value
26.3 vs 30e3
Comparator
3389e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant samples of 3377 had a lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–466 · show in text ↑
e3

“ADF (26.3 vs 30)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–527 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pioneer 3377 and 3389”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–39 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant samples of hybrid 3377 had lower hemicellulose than hybrid 3389 (16.2 vs 18.2; P < .01).

Material
3377e0
Outcome
hemicellulosee4
Direction
lowere0
Value
16.2 vs 18.2e4
Comparator
3389e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant samples of 3377 had a lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–466 · show in text ↑
e4

“hemicellulose (16.2 vs 18.2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pioneer 3377 and 3389”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–39 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant samples of hybrid 3377 had lower cellulose than hybrid 3389 (21.4 vs 24; P < .01).

Material
3377e0
Outcome
cellulosee5
Direction
lowere0
Value
21.4 vs 24e5
Comparator
3389e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant samples of 3377 had a lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–466 · show in text ↑
e5

“cellulose (21.4 vs 24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–581 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pioneer 3377 and 3389”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–39 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant samples of hybrid 3377 had lower lignin than hybrid 3389 (3.4 vs 3.8; P < .01).

Material
3377e0
Outcome
lignine6
Direction
lowere0
Value
3.4 vs 3.8e6
Comparator
3389e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant samples of 3377 had a lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–466 · show in text ↑
e6

“lignin (3.4 vs 3.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–606 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pioneer 3377 and 3389”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–39 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similar fiber differences between hybrids, of larger magnitude, were observed in stover samples.

Organ / stage
stovere0
Outcome
Similar differencese0
Direction
larger magnitudee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar differences, but of larger magnitude, were observed in stover samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ruminal in situ (24 h) and two-stage IVDMD of whole-plant and stover samples were greater for hybrid 3377 than 3389 (P < .01).

Material
3377e0
Outcome
Ruminal in situ (24 h) and two-stage IVDMDe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
3389e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ruminal in situ (24 h) and two-stage IVDMD of whole-plant and stover samples were greater (P < .01) for 3377 than for 3389”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ensiling reduced NDF, hemicellulose and cellulose content compared with fresh samples (P < .05).

Treatment
Ensilinge0
Outcome
NDF, hemicellulose, and cellulose contente0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
fresh samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ensiling reduced (P < .05) NDF, hemicellulose, and cellulose content compared with fresh samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The microbial inoculant had no effect (P > .10) on NDF, hemicellulose and cellulose content of ensiled corn.

Treatment
inoculante0
Outcome
NDF, hemicellulose, and cellulose contente0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ensiling reduced (P < .05) NDF, hemicellulose, and cellulose content compared with fresh samples; however, no effect (P > .10) due to inoculant was noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid x storage interactions were not observed (P > .10).

Outcome
Hybrid x storage interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrid x storage interactions were not observed (P > .10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation did not affect organic acid concentration of the silages (P > .10).

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
organic acid concentration of the silagese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation and hybrid did not affect (P > .10) organic acid concentration of the silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid did not affect organic acid concentration of the silages (P > .10).

Treatment
hybride0
Outcome
organic acid concentration of the silagese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation and hybrid did not affect (P > .10) organic acid concentration of the silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid 3377 had numerically lower grain as a percentage of whole plant than 3389 (41 vs 44).

Material
3377e0
Outcome
grain as a percentage of whole plante0
Direction
lowere0
Value
41 vs 44e0
Comparator
3389e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3377 actually had numerically lower grain as a percentage of whole plant than 3389 (41 vs 44)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole-plant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 117 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 117 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.