Paper · 2026 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Legume–grass mixtures with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve plant physiology, optimizing carbon and nitrogen dynamics and forage quality in perennial living mulches

Neda Nikpour Rashidabad; Ashley D. Keiser; Masoud Hashemi

13
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Perennial cover crops (also referred to as living mulches) represent an innovative management strategy that provides continuous soil cover throughout the year and supports organic production systems, agroforestry practices, and the adoption of sustainable agricultural systems. Although the benefits of annual cover crops are well documented, the potential benefit of perennial cover crops to enhance ecosystem services, including the potential for providing high-quality forage, remains underexplored. Methods To better understand the potential benefits of perennial cover crop mixtures, we quantified changes in plant physiology, biomass, and measures of forage quality across single- and mixed-species of clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis ). We applied varying ratios of clover and grass (C 100 , C 75 -G 25 , C 50 -G 50 , C 25 -G 75 , G 100 ), with and without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation. Results Clover dominant mixtures, particularly C 75 –G 25 , exhibited higher leaf chlorophyll content and produced the greatest shoot biomass. This mixture, when inoculated with AMF, also showed the highest shoot C and N concentrations, with AMF increasing shoot and root C by 7–9% and N by 20–33%. Across monocultures and mixtures, AMF inoculation increased photosynthetic rates by 7.2% and reduced intercellular CO 2 concentrations by 4.1%, which was associated with greater C and N concentration. AMF inoculation also enhanced root network depth, width, surface area, and volume by 3.5–28.1% across all treatments. Forage quality was specific to the species, with clover providing higher protein, fat, and calcium contents, and grass providing greater dry matter, phosphorus, potassium, lignin, ADF, NDF, and dNDF 48 . Discussion Overall, our results demonstrate that mixed legume–grass systems, particularly when combined with AMF, optimized biomass production, C and N concentration, and forage quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover-dominant mixtures, particularly C75-G25, had higher leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Treatment
Clover dominant mixtures, particularly C 75 –G 25e1
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contente1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“Clover dominant mixtures, particularly C 75 –G 25 , exhibited higher leaf chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover-dominant mixtures, particularly C75-G25, produced the greatest shoot biomass.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Treatment
Clover dominant mixtures, particularly C 75 –G 25e1
Outcome
shoot biomasse1
Direction
greateste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“Clover dominant mixtures, particularly C 75 –G 25 , exhibited higher leaf chlorophyll content and produced the greatest shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The C75-G25 mixture inoculated with AMF showed the highest shoot C and N concentrations.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Treatment
inoculated with AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
shoot C and N concentrationse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“This mixture, when inoculated with AMF, also showed the highest shoot C and N concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1196 · show in text ↑
e3

“with and without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased shoot and root C by 7-9%.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Treatment
AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root Ce1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
7–9%e1
Comparator
without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF increasing shoot and root C by 7–9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1242 · show in text ↑
e3

“with and without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased shoot and root N by 20-33%.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Treatment
AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
Ne1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
20–33%e1
Qualifier
shoot and roote1
Comparator
without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF increasing shoot and root C by 7–9% and N by 20–33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1258 · show in text ↑
e3

“with and without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across monocultures and mixtures, AMF inoculation increased photosynthetic rates by 7.2%.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
7.2%e1
Comparator
without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation increased photosynthetic rates by 7.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1348 · show in text ↑
e3

“with and without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across monocultures and mixtures, AMF inoculation reduced intercellular CO2 concentrations by 4.1%.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
intercellular CO 2 concentrationse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
4.1%e1
Comparator
without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation increased photosynthetic rates by 7.2% and reduced intercellular CO 2 concentrations by 4.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1402 · show in text ↑
e3

“with and without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–959 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in intercellular CO2 concentration was associated with greater C and N concentration.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Compound
intercellular CO 2 concentrationse1
Outcome
C and N concentratione1
Direction
greatere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduced intercellular CO 2 concentrations by 4.1%, which was associated with greater C and N concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation enhanced root network depth, width and surface area by 3.5-28.1% across all treatments.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
root network depth, width, surface areae1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
3.5–28.1%e1
Comparator
without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation also enhanced root network depth, width, surface area, and volume by 3.5–28.1% across all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1577 · show in text ↑
e3

“with and without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation enhanced root network volume by 3.5-28.1% across all treatments.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
volumee1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
3.5–28.1%e1
Qualifier
root networke1
Comparator
without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation also enhanced root network depth, width, surface area, and volume by 3.5–28.1% across all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1577 · show in text ↑
e3

“with and without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–959 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover provided higher protein, fat and calcium contents in forage.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Outcome
protein, fat, and calcium contentse1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“clover providing higher protein, fat, and calcium contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1686 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass provided greater dry matter, phosphorus and potassium in forage.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Outcome
dry matter, phosphorus, potassiume1
Direction
greatere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“grass providing greater dry matter, phosphorus, potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass provided greater lignin, ADF, NDF and dNDF 48 in forage.

Taxon
clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )Poa pratensisTrifolium ambiguume0
Outcome
lignin, ADF, NDF, and dNDF 48e1
Direction
greatere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium ambiguum
Trifolium ambiguum · TaxonЮрий Данилевский · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover ( Trifolium ambiguum ) and Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“grass providing greater dry matter, phosphorus, potassium, lignin, ADF, NDF, and dNDF 48”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1780 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Trifolium ambiguum (Caucasian clover)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Trifolium ambiguum (Caucasian clover)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.