Paper · 2026 · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

High manganese levels promote soil ammonium nitrogen accumulation but suppress plant nitrogen uptake

Jinlan Huang; Wenqiang Chen; Ziang Zhao; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Manganese ion (Mn(Ⅱ)) toxicity in acidic soils is a global agricultural and environmental issue that severely constrains crop productivity and soil ecosystem functioning. Systematic understanding of the effects of Mn(Ⅱ) stress on soil nitrogen (N) transformation processes and their underlying mechanisms remains limited. A short-term pot experiment using sugarcane (Saccharum officinaru250-wordm) was conducted to investigate the effects of varying Mn(Ⅱ) concentrations on sugarcane N uptake, soil N transformation processes, and the underlying microbial mechanisms. High Mn(Ⅱ) concentrations (≥ 900 mg·kg⁻¹) significantly inhibited N uptake in sugarcane, reducing plant N accumulation by approximately 50%. Elevated Mn(Ⅱ) levels stimulated soil urease activity but suppressed ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) activity and nitrification potential. Concurrently, the concentration of soil soluble organic nitrogen dropped from 88.46 to 20.78 mg kg⁻¹ , whereas ammonium nitrogen (NH₄⁺-N) rose from 3.29 to 14.50 mg kg⁻¹ . This divergence suggests that nitrification was suppressed, leading to the accumulation of NH₄⁺-N. The α-diversity index of the soil bacterial community exhibited a U-shaped response to increasing Mn(Ⅱ) concentrations, although its composition remained relatively stable. Ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) showed greater OTU richness and diversity than the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB). AMO activity correlated negatively with Nitrososphaera abundance but positively with Nitrosospira abundance. With increasing Mn(Ⅱ), Nitrosospira declined progressively while the tolerant genus Nitrosovibrio became dominant, reflecting community shifts under Mn stress. High Mn(Ⅱ) levels thus reshaped the AOB community structure, suppressed nitrification, and reduced plant N uptake efficiency. These findings offer a theoretical basis for improving nitrogen management and ecological remediation in Mn-contaminated acidic farmlands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High Mn concentrations reduced sugarcane nitrogen accumulation by about half.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
High Mn(Ⅱ) concentrations (≥ 900 mg·kg⁻¹)e0
Outcome
plant N accumulatione0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
approximately 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“High Mn(Ⅱ) concentrations (≥ 900 mg·kg⁻¹) significantly inhibited N uptake in sugarcane, reducing plant N accumulation by approximately 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated Mn stimulated soil urease activity.

Treatment
Elevated Mn(Ⅱ) levelse0
Outcome
soil urease activitye0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated Mn(Ⅱ) levels stimulated soil urease activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated Mn suppressed soil ammonia monooxygenase activity and nitrification potential.

Treatment
Elevated Mn(Ⅱ) levelse0
Outcome
ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) activity and nitrification potentiale0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated Mn(Ⅱ) levels stimulated soil urease activity but suppressed ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) activity and nitrification potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–842 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil soluble organic nitrogen fell from 88.46 to 20.78 mg kg⁻¹.

Outcome
soil soluble organic nitrogene0
Direction
droppede0
Value
88.46 to 20.78 mg kg⁻¹e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of soil soluble organic nitrogen dropped from 88.46 to 20.78 mg kg⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–944 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil ammonium nitrogen rose from 3.29 to 14.50 mg kg⁻¹.

Outcome
ammonium nitrogen (NH₄⁺-N)e0
Direction
rosee0
Value
3.29 to 14.50 mg kg⁻¹e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“ammonium nitrogen (NH₄⁺-N) rose from 3.29 to 14.50 mg kg⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1013 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bacterial alpha diversity had a U-shaped response to increasing Mn.

Treatment
increasing Mn(Ⅱ) concentrationse0
Outcome
α-diversity index of the soil bacterial communitye0
Direction
U-shaped responsee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The α-diversity index of the soil bacterial community exhibited a U-shaped response to increasing Mn(Ⅱ) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bacterial composition remained relatively stable.

Outcome
compositione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“its composition remained relatively stable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AOA had greater OTU richness and diversity than AOB.

Outcome
OTU richness and diversitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) showed greater OTU richness and diversity than the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1403 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMO activity correlated negatively with Nitrososphaera abundance.

Interactor
NitrososphaeraNitrososphaerae0other
Outcome
AMO activitye0
Direction
negativelye0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nitrososphaera
Nitrososphaera · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Michaela Stieglmeier, Andreas Klingl, Ricardo J. E. Alves, Simon K.-M. R. Rittmann, Michael Melcher, Nikolaus Leisch, Christa Schleper · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMO activity correlated negatively with Nitrososphaera abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1469 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMO activity correlated positively with Nitrosospira abundance.

Interactor
NitrosospiraNitrosospirae0other
Outcome
AMO activitye0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“AMO activity correlated negatively with Nitrososphaera abundance but positively with Nitrosospira abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1512 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrosospira declined as Mn increased.

Treatment
increasing Mn(Ⅱ)e0
Outcome
Nitrosospirae0
Direction
declined progressivelye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing Mn(Ⅱ), Nitrosospira declined progressively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1572 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrosovibrio became dominant as Mn increased.

Treatment
increasing Mn(Ⅱ)e0
Outcome
Nitrosovibrioe0
Direction
became dominante0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing Mn(Ⅱ), Nitrosospira declined progressively while the tolerant genus Nitrosovibrio became dominant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1627 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.