Paper · 1998 · South African Journal of Plant and Soil

The aluminium response network in wheat (Triticum aestivumL.): I. The root growth reactions

R. J. Bennet

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The mechanistic basis of Al rhizotoxicity was investigated through a time-based analysis of the growth reactions seen in hydroponically-grown roots of wheat isolines (IS and IT) differing in Al tolerance, when exposed to 75 μM Al (pH 4.1) for times ranging between 2 minutes and 48 h. Notwithstanding genotypic differences in the timing and the magnitude of the reactions, it was clear that the root growth adjustments made in response to Al involved three phases, 1) the primary response (IS and IT ≤ 60 min) which produced a net increase in root extension growth, 2) an intermediate period of growth inhibition (IS, 6 h; IT, 24 h.) and 3) recovery (IT 48 h) which included growth stimulation. Close relationships also emerged between the time-dependent, Al-induced increases and decreases in root extension growth and the volume (length) of the root cap and the length of root epidermal cells which suggested that cap volume and root epidermal cell extensibility may also be components of the Al response network. These findings are discussed with a view to developing a coherent theory of Al rhizo- toxicity/root growth control. Genotypic similarities and differences in the root growth responses shown to Al are used to distinguish between Al escape strategies (stress avoidance, IT and IS) and the longer term activation of genetically controlled mechanisms of Al tolerance (IT) involved in the recovery from Al.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium initially increased root extension in both isolines.

Material
IS and ITe0
Treatment
75 μM Al (pH 4.1)e0
Outcome
root extension growthe1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
IS and IT ≤ 60 mine1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roots of wheat isolines (IS and IT) differing in Al tolerance, when exposed to 75 μM Al (pH 4.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“the primary response (IS and IT ≤ 60 min) which produced a net increase in root extension growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium inhibited root growth at 6 h in IS.

Material
ISe1
Treatment
75 μM Al (pH 4.1)e0
Outcome
growth inhibitione1
Direction
inhibitione1
Qualifier
6 he1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roots of wheat isolines (IS and IT) differing in Al tolerance, when exposed to 75 μM Al (pH 4.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth inhibition (IS, 6 h; IT, 24 h.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium inhibited root growth at 24 h in IT.

Material
ITe1
Treatment
75 μM Al (pH 4.1)e0
Outcome
growth inhibitione1
Direction
inhibitione1
Qualifier
24 he1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roots of wheat isolines (IS and IT) differing in Al tolerance, when exposed to 75 μM Al (pH 4.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth inhibition (IS, 6 h; IT, 24 h.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IT roots recovered and showed stimulated growth after 48 h.

Material
ITe1
Treatment
75 μM Al (pH 4.1)e0
Outcome
growth stimulatione1
Direction
stimulatione1
Qualifier
IT 48 he1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roots of wheat isolines (IS and IT) differing in Al tolerance, when exposed to 75 μM Al (pH 4.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“recovery (IT 48 h) which included growth stimulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–693 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium driven changes in root extension related closely to root cap volume.

Organ / stage
root cape1
Treatment
75 μM Al (pH 4.1)e0
Outcome
root extension growthe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roots of wheat isolines (IS and IT) differing in Al tolerance, when exposed to 75 μM Al (pH 4.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“Close relationships also emerged between the time-dependent, Al-induced increases and decreases in root extension growth and the volume (length) of the root cap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–855 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium driven changes in root extension related closely to root epidermal cell length.

Organ / stage
root epidermal cellse1
Treatment
75 μM Al (pH 4.1)e0
Outcome
length of root epidermal cellse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roots of wheat isolines (IS and IT) differing in Al tolerance, when exposed to 75 μM Al (pH 4.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“the length of root epidermal cells which suggested that cap volume and root epidermal cell extensibility may also be components of the Al response network”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–1014 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret both isolines as showing aluminium avoidance, with longer term tolerance in IT.

Material
IT and ISe1
Outcome
recovery from Ale1
Qualifier
genetically controlled mechanisms of Al tolerancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat isolines (IS and IT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Al escape strategies (stress avoidance, IT and IS) and the longer term activation of genetically controlled mechanisms of Al tolerance (IT) involved in the recovery from Al”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1416 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 13 positive, 54 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

aluminium atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

ph · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

ph · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 6 positive, 24 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.