Paper · 2014 · Sains Malaysiana

Effect of zeolite and zinc on the biochemical characteristics of canola upon drought stress.

Nasser Shahsavari; H. M. Jais; A H Shirani Rad

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of zeolite and zinc foliar applications on the biochemical characteristics of canola cultivars under different moisture regimes were investigated in a study conducted during the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons. The study was completed using a factorial split-plot experiment based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications at the Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Karaj, Iran. The treatments were: irrigation (I): complete (I1) and restricted (I2); zeolite (Z): 0 (Z1) and 15 ton ha-1 (Z2) and Zn: 0, 0.1 and 0.2% concentrations of zinc sulfate (Zn1, Zn2, and Zn3) at the pod formation stage. These treatments were applied during the pod formation stage to the Licord, RGS003 and Opera cultivars. This study showed that although applying Z and Zn had positive effects on the quality of canola, the highest performance and the best results were obtained using a combination of Z and Zn. The combined application of Z and Zn decreased the proline and carbohydrate contents to 44.35 and 34.42%, respectively. Therefore, with the low cost of natural Z and moderate Zn intake, these treatments can be used to enhance the performance of canola, especially in regions frequently subjected to water stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite had positive effects on the quality of canola.

Treatment
zeolitee0
Outcome
quality of canolae2
Direction
positivee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of zeolite and zinc foliar applications on the biochemical characteristics of canola cultivars under different moisture regimes were investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“This study showed that although applying Z and Zn had positive effects on the quality of canola, the highest performance and the best results were obtained using a combination of Z and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc had positive effects on the quality of canola.

Treatment
zince0
Outcome
quality of canolae2
Direction
positivee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of zeolite and zinc foliar applications on the biochemical characteristics of canola cultivars under different moisture regimes were investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“This study showed that although applying Z and Zn had positive effects on the quality of canola, the highest performance and the best results were obtained using a combination of Z and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of zeolite and zinc gave the highest canola performance.

Treatment
a combination of Z and Zne2
Outcome
performancee2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of zeolite and zinc foliar applications on the biochemical characteristics of canola cultivars under different moisture regimes were investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“This study showed that although applying Z and Zn had positive effects on the quality of canola, the highest performance and the best results were obtained using a combination of Z and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application of zeolite and zinc decreased proline content of canola to 44.35.

Treatment
combined application of Z and Zne3
Outcome
prolinee3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
44.35e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of zeolite and zinc foliar applications on the biochemical characteristics of canola cultivars under different moisture regimes were investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combined application of Z and Zn decreased the proline and carbohydrate contents to 44.35 and 34.42%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application of zeolite and zinc decreased carbohydrate content of canola to 34.42%.

Treatment
combined application of Z and Zne3
Outcome
carbohydrate contentse3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
34.42%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of zeolite and zinc foliar applications on the biochemical characteristics of canola cultivars under different moisture regimes were investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combined application of Z and Zn decreased the proline and carbohydrate contents to 44.35 and 34.42%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1050 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite and zinc treatments can be used to enhance canola performance, especially in regions often subject to water stress.

Outcome
enhance the performance of canolae4
Qualifier
especially in regions frequently subjected to water stresse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of zeolite and zinc foliar applications on the biochemical characteristics of canola cultivars under different moisture regimes were investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e4

“these treatments can be used to enhance the performance of canola, especially in regions frequently subjected to water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1243 · show in text ↑

other · quality: general · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.