Abstract
Broadcasting application of cattle manure increases green ear, corn grain, and forage yields of corn cultivars, but only at high doses, i.e., at rates ranging from 40 t ha -1 to 60 t ha -1 . Demand for this fertilizer is very high and prices tend to increase. In addition, doses considered economic are relatively low, around 8 t ha -1 . It is possible that more effective application methods may reduce the required amount of the fertilizer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of application modes (by broadcasting or in the planting furrow) of cattle manure doses (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 t ha 1 ) on green ear yield (in one experiment) and grain yield (in another experiment) of the corn cultivar AG 1051. The (factorial) experiments were arranged in a randomized block design with eight replicates. Manure doses and fertilizer mode of application did not influence plant and ear heights, total number and weight of ears, and the number and weight of marketable ears, both unhusked and husked. Manure doses did not influence grain yield and its components, but manure broadcast application determined higher grain yield than furrow application, a result obtained mainly because of the positive effect on 100-grain weight.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Cattle manure doses did not influence plant and ear heights of corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1 - Material
- AG 1051e1
- Treatment
- Manure dosese2
- Outcome
- plant and ear heightse2
- Direction
- did not influencee2
- Comparator
- 0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of application modes (by broadcasting or in the planting furrow) of cattle manure doses (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 t ha 1 ) on green ear yield (in one experiment) and grain yield (in another experiment) of the corn cultivar AG 1051”
e2“Manure doses and fertilizer mode of application did not influence plant and ear heights, total number and weight of ears, and the number and weight of marketable ears, both unhusked and husked”
Claim · model-written summary
Cattle manure doses did not influence total number and weight of corn ears.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
- Material
- AG 1051e1
- Treatment
- Manure dosese2
- Outcome
- total number and weight of earse2
- Direction
- did not influencee2
- Comparator
- 0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of application modes (by broadcasting or in the planting furrow) of cattle manure doses (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 t ha 1 ) on green ear yield (in one experiment) and grain yield (in another experiment) of the corn cultivar AG 1051”
e2“Manure doses and fertilizer mode of application did not influence plant and ear heights, total number and weight of ears, and the number and weight of marketable ears, both unhusked and husked”
Claim · model-written summary
Cattle manure doses did not influence the number and weight of marketable corn ears.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
- Material
- AG 1051e1
- Treatment
- Manure dosese2
- Outcome
- number and weight of marketable earse2
- Direction
- did not influencee2
- Comparator
- 0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of application modes (by broadcasting or in the planting furrow) of cattle manure doses (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 t ha 1 ) on green ear yield (in one experiment) and grain yield (in another experiment) of the corn cultivar AG 1051”
e2“Manure doses and fertilizer mode of application did not influence plant and ear heights, total number and weight of ears, and the number and weight of marketable ears, both unhusked and husked”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer application mode did not influence plant and ear heights of corn.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
- Material
- AG 1051e1
- Treatment
- fertilizer mode of applicatione2
- Outcome
- plant and ear heightse2
- Direction
- did not influencee2
- Comparator
- planting furrowe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of application modes (by broadcasting or in the planting furrow) of cattle manure doses (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 t ha 1 ) on green ear yield (in one experiment) and grain yield (in another experiment) of the corn cultivar AG 1051”
e2“Manure doses and fertilizer mode of application did not influence plant and ear heights, total number and weight of ears, and the number and weight of marketable ears, both unhusked and husked”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer application mode did not influence total number and weight of corn ears.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
- Material
- AG 1051e1
- Treatment
- fertilizer mode of applicatione2
- Outcome
- total number and weight of earse2
- Direction
- did not influencee2
- Comparator
- planting furrowe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of application modes (by broadcasting or in the planting furrow) of cattle manure doses (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 t ha 1 ) on green ear yield (in one experiment) and grain yield (in another experiment) of the corn cultivar AG 1051”
e2“Manure doses and fertilizer mode of application did not influence plant and ear heights, total number and weight of ears, and the number and weight of marketable ears, both unhusked and husked”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer application mode did not influence the number and weight of marketable corn ears.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
- Material
- AG 1051e1
- Treatment
- fertilizer mode of applicatione2
- Outcome
- number and weight of marketable earse2
- Direction
- did not influencee2
- Comparator
- planting furrowe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of application modes (by broadcasting or in the planting furrow) of cattle manure doses (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 t ha 1 ) on green ear yield (in one experiment) and grain yield (in another experiment) of the corn cultivar AG 1051”
e2“Manure doses and fertilizer mode of application did not influence plant and ear heights, total number and weight of ears, and the number and weight of marketable ears, both unhusked and husked”
Claim · model-written summary
Cattle manure doses did not influence corn grain yield and its components.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
- Material
- AG 1051e1
- Treatment
- Manure dosese3
- Outcome
- grain yield and its componentse3
- Direction
- did not influencee3
- Comparator
- 0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of application modes (by broadcasting or in the planting furrow) of cattle manure doses (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 t ha 1 ) on green ear yield (in one experiment) and grain yield (in another experiment) of the corn cultivar AG 1051”
e3“Manure doses did not influence grain yield and its components, but manure broadcast application determined higher grain yield than furrow application, a result obtained mainly because of the positive effect on 100-grain weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Broadcast application of cattle manure gave higher corn grain yield than furrow application.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
- Material
- AG 1051e1
- Treatment
- manure broadcast applicatione3
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- furrow applicatione3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of application modes (by broadcasting or in the planting furrow) of cattle manure doses (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 t ha 1 ) on green ear yield (in one experiment) and grain yield (in another experiment) of the corn cultivar AG 1051”
e3“Manure doses did not influence grain yield and its components, but manure broadcast application determined higher grain yield than furrow application, a result obtained mainly because of the positive effect on 100-grain weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Broadcast application of cattle manure had a positive effect on corn 100-grain weight compared with furrow application.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
- Material
- AG 1051e1
- Treatment
- manure broadcast applicatione3
- Outcome
- 100-grain weighte3
- Direction
- positive effecte3
- Comparator
- furrow applicatione3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of application modes (by broadcasting or in the planting furrow) of cattle manure doses (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 t ha 1 ) on green ear yield (in one experiment) and grain yield (in another experiment) of the corn cultivar AG 1051”
e3“Manure doses did not influence grain yield and its components, but manure broadcast application determined higher grain yield than furrow application, a result obtained mainly because of the positive effect on 100-grain weight”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: postharvest · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →transplanting · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
126 papers more in this group
See all 130 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.