Paper · 2007 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Impact of crop-crop diversity on pod-borer (Helicoverpa armigera) of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)

M. S. Rao; C. A. Rama Rao; G. Sree Vani; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) season 2003 and 2004 at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]. The incidence of major pod-borer H. armigera varied temporally across cropping systems and significant fluctuation was noticed even at peak level of population (13-16 weeks after sowing). Intercropping also caused significant variation in pod and grain damage by pod-borers Maruca vitrata (Geyer), Exelastis atomosa (Walsingham) and Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch). The intercrops, viz sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) reduced the pod damage by H. armigera, M. vitrata, and M. obtusa significantly. The grain damage by lepidopteran borers was less in pigeonpea + sorghum (l5.15%), pigeonpea + groundnut (22.26%) and pigeonpea + blackgram (20.49%) intercropping systems. These effective cropping systems registered highest pigeonpea equivalent yields that was in the range of 0.97-1.1 1 tonnes/ha. Further these systems were more efficient agronomically in terms of land equivalent ratio (1.04-1.31), aggressivity (1.03-1.49), competitive ratio (1.77-1.97) and relative crowding coefficient (4.08 - 9.59). Economic analysis showed these intercropping systems to be more profitable than the sole pigeonpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The incidence of the major pod-borer Helicoverpa armigera in pigeonpea varied over time across cropping systems.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
incidence of major pod-borer H. armigerae1
Qualifier
varied temporally across cropping systemse1
Setting
Hyderabade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–226 · show in text ↑
e1

“The incidence of major pod-borer H. armigera varied temporally across cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea intercropped with sorghum reduced pod damage by H. armigera significantly.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)e3
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae3pest
Second interactor
M. vitrataMaruca vitratae3pest
Outcome
pod damage by H. armigerae3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · Second interactorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–226 · show in text ↑
e3

“The intercrops, viz sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) reduced the pod damage by H. armigera, M. vitrata, and M. obtusa significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea intercropped with groundnut reduced pod damage by H. armigera significantly.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)e3
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae3pest
Second interactor
M. vitrataMaruca vitratae3pest
Outcome
pod damage by H. armigerae3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · Second interactorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–226 · show in text ↑
e3

“The intercrops, viz sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) reduced the pod damage by H. armigera, M. vitrata, and M. obtusa significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea intercropped with blackgram reduced pod damage by H. armigera significantly.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper)e3
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae3pest
Second interactor
M. vitrataMaruca vitratae3pest
Outcome
pod damage by H. armigerae3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · Second interactorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–226 · show in text ↑
e3

“The intercrops, viz sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) reduced the pod damage by H. armigera, M. vitrata, and M. obtusa significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain damage by lepidopteran borers was lower in pigeonpea + sorghum (l5.15%).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeonpea + sorghume4
Interactor
lepidopteran borerse4pest
Outcome
grain damage by lepidopteran borerse4
Direction
lesse4
Value
l5.15%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–226 · show in text ↑
e4

“The grain damage by lepidopteran borers was less in pigeonpea + sorghum (l5.15%), pigeonpea + groundnut (22.26%) and pigeonpea + blackgram (20.49%) intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain damage by lepidopteran borers was lower in pigeonpea + groundnut (22.26%).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeonpea + groundnute4
Interactor
lepidopteran borerse4pest
Outcome
grain damage by lepidopteran borerse4
Direction
lesse4
Value
22.26%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–226 · show in text ↑
e4

“The grain damage by lepidopteran borers was less in pigeonpea + sorghum (l5.15%), pigeonpea + groundnut (22.26%) and pigeonpea + blackgram (20.49%) intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain damage by lepidopteran borers was lower in pigeonpea + blackgram (20.49%).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeonpea + blackgrame4
Interactor
lepidopteran borerse4pest
Outcome
grain damage by lepidopteran borerse4
Direction
lesse4
Value
20.49%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–226 · show in text ↑
e4

“The grain damage by lepidopteran borers was less in pigeonpea + sorghum (l5.15%), pigeonpea + groundnut (22.26%) and pigeonpea + blackgram (20.49%) intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective intercropping systems gave the highest pigeonpea equivalent yields, in the range of 0.97-1.1 1 tonnes/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane5
Outcome
pigeonpea equivalent yieldse5
Direction
higheste5
Value
0.97-1.1 1 tonnes/hae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“These effective cropping systems registered highest pigeonpea equivalent yields that was in the range of 0.97-1.1 1 tonnes/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1091 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercropping systems had a land equivalent ratio of 1.04-1.31.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
land equivalent ratioe6
Value
1.04-1.31e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–226 · show in text ↑
e6

“land equivalent ratio (1.04-1.31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1194 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercropping systems had an aggressivity of 1.03-1.49.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
aggressivitye7
Value
1.03-1.49e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–226 · show in text ↑
e7

“aggressivity (1.03-1.49)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1220 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercropping systems had a competitive ratio of 1.77-1.97.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
competitive ratioe2
Value
1.77-1.97e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–226 · show in text ↑
e2

“competitive ratio (1.77-1.97)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1251 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercropping systems had a relative crowding coefficient of 4.08 - 9.59.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
relative crowding coefficiente3
Value
4.08 - 9.59e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hyderabad to study the impact of crop -crop diversity on incidence of pod-borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–226 · show in text ↑
e3

“relative crowding coefficient (4.08 - 9.59)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercropping systems were more profitable than sole pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane4
Treatment
these intercropping systemse4
Outcome
profitablee4
Direction
moree4
Comparator
sole pigeonpeae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Economic analysis showed these intercropping systems to be more profitable than the sole pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1399 · show in text ↑

Vigna mungo · pest · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Sorghum · pest · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.