Paper · 1990 · Journal of Environmental Horticulture

Growth Inhibition of Ericaceous Plants from Metolachlor

J. Ray Frank; C. E. Beste

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Yellow nutsedge ( Cyperus esculentus L.) is a major weed problem in many perennial woody crops. Dual 8E4 (metolachlor) at 4.5, 6.7, 9.0 and 13.5 kg/ha (4, 6, 8 and 12 lb/A) was evaluated in the field for 4 years to determine phytotoxicity to 11 varieties of azaleas. Also evaluated were Ericaceous species including coast leucothoe, compact Japanese andromeda, and Rhododendron × ‘PJM’. Fall or spring applications of metolachlor at rates up to 13.5 kg/ha (12.0 lb/A) caused no injury to the established azaleas ‘Delaware Valley White’, ‘Hershey Red’ and ‘Hinocrimson’. Some temporary injury occurred to newly planted ‘Hinocrimson’ azaleas treated with metolachlor at 6.7 kg/ha (6.0 lb/A). A July application at this same rate caused some temporary injury to established ‘Delaware Valley White’, ‘Double Pink’, ‘Hershey Red’, ‘Hot Shot’, ‘Karen’, ‘Lady Robin’, ‘Rosebud’ and ‘Tradition’ azaleas and ‘Coast lecothoe’ and ‘PJM’ rhododendron. No reduction in crop quality or size was observed with any species at time of crop harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall or spring metolachlor up to 13.5 kg/ha caused no injury in three established azalea varieties.

Taxon
azalease0
Material
‘Delaware Valley White’, ‘Hershey Red’ and ‘Hinocrimson’e0
Treatment
metolachlor at rates up to 13.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
Fall or spring applications of metolachlor at rates up to 13.5 kg/ha (12.0 lb/A) caused no injury to the established azaleas ‘Delaware Valley White’, ‘Hershey Red’ and ‘Hinocrimson’e0
Direction
no injurye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fall or spring applications of metolachlor at rates up to 13.5 kg/ha (12.0 lb/A) caused no injury to the established azaleas ‘Delaware Valley White’, ‘Hershey Red’ and ‘Hinocrimson’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor at 6.7 kg/ha temporarily injured newly planted Hinocrimson azaleas.

Taxon
azalease0
Material
‘Hinocrimson’e0
Treatment
metolachlor at 6.7 kg/hae0
Outcome
Some temporary injury occurred to newly planted ‘Hinocrimson’ azaleas treated with metolachlor at 6.7 kg/ha (6.0 lb/A)e0
Direction
injurye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Some temporary injury occurred to newly planted ‘Hinocrimson’ azaleas treated with metolachlor at 6.7 kg/ha (6.0 lb/A)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

July metolachlor at 6.7 kg/ha temporarily injured established azaleas, Coast lecothoe and PJM rhododendron.

Taxon
azalease0
Treatment
A July application at this same ratee0
Outcome
A July application at this same rate caused some temporary injury to established ‘Delaware Valley White’, ‘Double Pink’, ‘Hershey Red’, ‘Hot Shot’, ‘Karen’, ‘Lady Robin’, ‘Rosebud’ and ‘Tradition’ azaleas and ‘Coast lecothoe’ and ‘PJM’ rhododendrone0
Direction
injurye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A July application at this same rate caused some temporary injury to established ‘Delaware Valley White’, ‘Double Pink’, ‘Hershey Red’, ‘Hot Shot’, ‘Karen’, ‘Lady Robin’, ‘Rosebud’ and ‘Tradition’ azaleas and ‘Coast lecothoe’ and ‘PJM’ rhododendron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–947 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No species showed reduced crop quality or size at harvest.

Taxon
Ericaceous Plantst0
Outcome
No reduction in crop quality or size was observed with any species at time of crop harveste0

Verbatim

e0

“No reduction in crop quality or size was observed with any species at time of crop harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ericaceous Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–38 · show in text ↑