Paper · 2020 · The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico

Storage tolerance of five short-day onion cultivars during a 12-week period

Guillermo J. Fornaris; Elvin Caraballo; Rubén Guadalupe; et al.

9
claims
35
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The number of damaged bulbs of five short-day onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivars was determined during 12 weeks in storage at art average mean room temperature of 27.4˚C approximately 80% relative humidity. Percentage of total solids before storage ranged from 6.84% to 8.06% at the beginning of the study. Bulbs with symptoms of bacterial soft rot (Erwinia carotovora), black mold rot (Aspergillus niger) or sprouted were recorded and discarded weekly. At the end of the 12-week storage period, bacterial soft rot was the most damaging condition, followed by black mold rot. The cumulative percentage of total bulbs discarded was greater in the deep, flat shaped Granex 33 cultivar (16.14%). This percentage was significantly higher than that for bulbs discarded among cultivars Texas Grano 502 (6.16%), Granex 429 (3.89%), Texas Grano 1025Y (3.13%), and Ringer Grano (2.44%). There were no significant differences among these four cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial total solids across onion cultivars ranged from 6.84% to 8.06%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Organ / stage
bulbse1
Outcome
Percentage of total solidse0
Value
6.84% to 8.06%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage of total solids before storage ranged from 6.84% to 8.06% at the beginning of the study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of damaged bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial soft rot was the most damaging condition after 12 weeks of onion storage.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Interactor
Erwinia carotovoraPectobacterium carotovorume1pathogen
Outcome
bacterial soft rot was the most damaging conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectobacterium carotovorum
Pectobacterium carotovorum · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the end of the 12-week storage period, bacterial soft rot was the most damaging condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–544 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial soft rot (Erwinia carotovora)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–367 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black mold rot ranked second in damage after 12 weeks of onion storage.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Interactor
Aspergillus nigerAspergillus nigere1pathogen
Outcome
followed by black mold rote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by black mold rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–572 · show in text ↑
e1

“black mold rot (Aspergillus niger)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Granex 33 had 16.14% cumulative bulb discards, more than the other named cultivars.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
Granex 33e0
Outcome
cumulative percentage of total bulbs discardede0
Direction
greatere0
Value
16.14%e0
Comparator
Texas Grano 502e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cumulative percentage of total bulbs discarded was greater in the deep, flat shaped Granex 33 cultivar (16.14%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“This percentage was significantly higher than that for bulbs discarded among cultivars Texas Grano 502 (6.16%), Granex 429 (3.89%), Texas Grano 1025Y (3.13%), and Ringer Grano (2.44%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Texas Grano 502 had 6.16% bulb discards, significantly below Granex 33.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
Texas Grano 502e0
Outcome
bulbs discardede0
Direction
highere1
Value
6.16%e0
Comparator
Granex 33e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulbs discarded among cultivars Texas Grano 502 (6.16%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“This percentage was significantly higher than that for bulbs discarded among cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–777 · show in text ↑
e2

“Granex 33 cultivar (16.14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Granex 429 had 3.89% bulb discards, significantly below Granex 33.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
Granex 429e0
Outcome
bulbs discardede3
Direction
highere1
Value
3.89%e0
Comparator
Granex 33e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Granex 429 (3.89%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“This percentage was significantly higher than that for bulbs discarded among cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–777 · show in text ↑
e2

“Granex 33 cultivar (16.14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–689 · show in text ↑
e3

“bulbs discarded among cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Texas Grano 1025Y had 3.13% bulb discards, significantly below Granex 33.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
Texas Grano 1025Ye0
Outcome
bulbs discardede3
Direction
highere1
Value
3.13%e0
Comparator
Granex 33e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Texas Grano 1025Y (3.13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–848 · show in text ↑
e1

“This percentage was significantly higher than that for bulbs discarded among cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–777 · show in text ↑
e2

“Granex 33 cultivar (16.14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–689 · show in text ↑
e3

“bulbs discarded among cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ringer Grano had 2.44% bulb discards, significantly below Granex 33.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
Ringer Granoe0
Outcome
bulbs discardede3
Direction
highere1
Value
2.44%e0
Comparator
Granex 33e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ringer Grano (2.44%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–874 · show in text ↑
e1

“This percentage was significantly higher than that for bulbs discarded among cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–777 · show in text ↑
e2

“Granex 33 cultivar (16.14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–689 · show in text ↑
e3

“bulbs discarded among cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb discard percentages did not differ significantly among Texas Grano 502, Granex 429, Texas Grano 1025Y and Ringer Grano.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
Texas Grano 502e1
Outcome
bulbs discardede2
Direction
no significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences among these four cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars Texas Grano 502 (6.16%), Granex 429 (3.89%), Texas Grano 1025Y (3.13%), and Ringer Grano (2.44%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–874 · show in text ↑
e2

“bulbs discarded among cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑