- ethenePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Origanum vulgareResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium dichlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlorine dioxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- thymolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results14 papers: 5 positive, 9 negative or no effect
- storagePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- co2Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- uvResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- coldResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- heatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- in vitroResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- radiationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.