Disease · Vaccinium

1. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Origanum vulgareResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. calcium dichlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. chlorine dioxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. thymolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. co2Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. uvResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. coldResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. heatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. in vitroResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. radiationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.