Yield · Vaccinium

38 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. HexazinoneResults differ3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  2. propyzamideResults differ2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  3. (-)-methyl jasmonatePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  4. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  5. ammonium sulfatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. calcium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. glyphosatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  8. paclobutrazolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  9. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. TerbacilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. glycine betaineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. kaolinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. spermidineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. fertilizationResults differ25 papers: 12 positive, 13 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  19. pruningResults differ18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  20. graftingResults differ5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  21. pollinationPositive and negative results10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. mulchingPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  23. nitrogenPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. firePositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  25. in vitroPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  26. limePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  27. herbicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  28. otherPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. phPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  30. applicationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. irrigationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. growing mediumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. shadeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. coldResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. protected cultivationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.