fertilization · Yield · Vaccinium

Results differ25 papers: 12 positive, 13 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ

36 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.

Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2

2 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.

How these papers cite each other

2 citations between these papers: 0 on the same side, 2 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect1990199520002005201020152020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 12

  1. Effect of Soil-applying N, NP and NPK Fertilizer on The Growth,Yield and Leaf Element Content of Blueberry · 1997

  2. Establishment of a Non-dormant Blueberry (Vaccinium Corymbosum Hybrid) Production System in a Warm Winter Climate · 1998

  3. (374) Fertilization of Southern Highbush Blueberries on Pine Bark Beds · 2005

  4. (164) The Influence of Mulch Applications on Vegetation Dynamics in Organically Managed Highbush Blueberry · 2006

  5. Effect of Nitrogen Form Ratios on the Growth,Yield and Leaf Element Content of Blueberry · 2008

  6. Comparison of consecutive and alternate fertilizer applications in wild blueberry production · 2009

    cites 2 papers here

  7. Effects of Fertilizer Rate and Form on Vegetative Growth and Yield of Southern Highbush Blueberry in Pine Bark Culture · 2009

  8. Effect of Coupling in Fertilizer with Water on Production and Quality of Blueberry · 2010

  9. MULCH EFFECTS ON HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY UNDER ORGANIC MANAGEMENT · 2014

  10. Improved Growth and Harvestable Yield through Optimization of Fertilizer Rates of Soil-applied Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium in Wild Blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) · 2016

  11. Effects of Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizers on Blueberry Fruits Quality · 2017

  12. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium formula fertilization on the yield and berry quality of blueberry · 2023

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 13

  1. Effect of Fertilizer Applications, Plant Age, and Rainfall on the Yield and Fruit Size of Rabbiteye Blueberry Clone T-110 · 1986

  2. TB198: Economic Analysis of Organic Pest Management Strategies for Lowbush Blueberries Using Enterprise Budgeting · 2008

  3. Maritime Provinces Wild Blueberry Fertilizer Study · 2008

    cited by 1 paper here

  4. Wild blueberry response to phosphorus applied to Prince Edward Island soils · 2008

    cited by 1 paper here

  5. Effect of Organic Amendments on Half-Highbush Blueberry Production and Soil Fertility · 2008

  6. Hexazinone and Fertilizer Impacts on Sheep Sorrel (Rumex acetosella) in Wild Blueberry · 2010

  7. Variable Rate Fertilizer Application in Wild Blueberry Fields: Impacts on Plant Growth and Yield · 2013

  8. Impact of Variable Rate Fertilization on Wild Blueberry Plant Growth and Fruit Yield · 2013

  9. EFFECT OF DIVERSE LONG-TERM MINERAL FERTILIZATION ON FRUIT YIELD AND MINERAL CONTENT IN THE LEAVES OF HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY PLANTS · 2014

  10. Foliar Applications of Calcium and Boron Do Not Increase Fruit Set or Yield in Northern Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) · 2017

  11. Bush Growth and Fruit Quality of ‘Duke’ Blueberry Influenced by Nutrition Supply Periods in Unheated Plastic House · 2020

  12. Evaluating Postharvest Organic Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications in Early Fruiting Northern Highbush Blueberry · 2021

  13. Effects of Long-Term Nitrogen Fertilization and Application Methods on Fruit Yield, Plant Nutrition, and Soil Chemical Properties in Highbush Blueberries · 2024

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

fertilization on Vaccinium against other targets

fertilization · yield on other organisms