Paper · 2008 · International Journal of Fruit Science

Maritime Provinces Wild Blueberry Fertilizer Study

Kevin Sanderson; Leonard Eaton; Michel Melanson; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Field experiments were carried out over a 4-year period (2001–2004) at one commercial site in each of the Maritime Provinces, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick. The study was designed to determine the effects of applied fertilizer in sprout year only and in both sprout and crop year on leaf and soil concentration, plant development, and yield. Individually, sprout-year applications of fertilizers ammonium sulfate, di-ammonium sulfate, and 17-17-17 and crop-year application of ammonium sulfate did not affect soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yield. When comparing the mean of fertilizer applications to unfertilized plots, levels of soil, P, K, and S were increased and soil pH decreased and leaf tissue concentrations of N, P, K, and S were increased. Stem length, number of live buds, and number of blossoms were increased; however, yield was not affected in the first cropping cycle and was lowered in the second cropping cycle by applications of fertilizers. Crop-year applications of ammonium sulfate provided no benefit to wild blueberry production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprout-year ammonium sulfate did not affect soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yield.

Taxon
Wild Blueberryt0
Treatment
ammonium sulfatee0
Outcome
soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
sprout-yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Individually, sprout-year applications of fertilizers ammonium sulfate, di-ammonium sulfate, and 17-17-17 and crop-year application of ammonium sulfate did not affect soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprout-year di-ammonium sulfate did not affect soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yield.

Taxon
Wild Blueberryt0
Treatment
di-ammonium sulfatee0
Outcome
soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
sprout-yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Individually, sprout-year applications of fertilizers ammonium sulfate, di-ammonium sulfate, and 17-17-17 and crop-year application of ammonium sulfate did not affect soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprout-year 17-17-17 did not affect soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yield.

Taxon
Wild Blueberryt0
Treatment
17-17-17e0
Outcome
soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
sprout-yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Individually, sprout-year applications of fertilizers ammonium sulfate, di-ammonium sulfate, and 17-17-17 and crop-year application of ammonium sulfate did not affect soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop-year ammonium sulfate did not affect soil and leaf concentrations, growth, or yield.

Taxon
Wild Blueberryt0
Treatment
ammonium sulfatee0
Outcome
soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
crop-yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Individually, sprout-year applications of fertilizers ammonium sulfate, di-ammonium sulfate, and 17-17-17 and crop-year application of ammonium sulfate did not affect soil and leaf concentrations, plant growth, or yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applications increased soil, P, K, and S relative to unfertilized plots.

Taxon
Wild Blueberryt0
Treatment
fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
soil, P, K, and Se0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unfertilized plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“When comparing the mean of fertilizer applications to unfertilized plots, levels of soil, P, K, and S were increased and soil pH decreased and leaf tissue concentrations of N, P, K, and S were increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applications increased leaf tissue concentrations of N, P, K, and S relative to unfertilized plots.

Taxon
Wild Blueberryt0
Treatment
fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
leaf tissue concentrations of N, P, K, and Se0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unfertilized plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“When comparing the mean of fertilizer applications to unfertilized plots, levels of soil, P, K, and S were increased and soil pH decreased and leaf tissue concentrations of N, P, K, and S were increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applications decreased soil pH relative to unfertilized plots.

Taxon
Wild Blueberryt0
Treatment
fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
unfertilized plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“When comparing the mean of fertilizer applications to unfertilized plots, levels of soil, P, K, and S were increased and soil pH decreased and leaf tissue concentrations of N, P, K, and S were increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applications increased stem length, live buds, and blossoms.

Taxon
Wild Blueberryt0
Treatment
applications of fertilizerse0
Outcome
Stem length, number of live buds, and number of blossomse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stem length, number of live buds, and number of blossoms were increased; however, yield was not affected in the first cropping cycle and was lowered in the second cropping cycle by applications of fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applications did not affect yield in the first cropping cycle.

Taxon
Wild Blueberryt0
Treatment
applications of fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
first cropping cyclee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stem length, number of live buds, and number of blossoms were increased; however, yield was not affected in the first cropping cycle and was lowered in the second cropping cycle by applications of fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applications lowered yield in the second cropping cycle.

Taxon
Wild Blueberryt0
Treatment
applications of fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowerede0
Qualifier
second cropping cyclee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stem length, number of live buds, and number of blossoms were increased; however, yield was not affected in the first cropping cycle and was lowered in the second cropping cycle by applications of fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop-year ammonium sulfate provided no production benefit.

Taxon
Wild Blueberryt0
Treatment
ammonium sulfatee0
Outcome
wild blueberry productione0
Direction
no benefite0
Qualifier
Crop-yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Crop-year applications of ammonium sulfate provided no benefit to wild blueberry production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · yield · VacciniumPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · VacciniumResults differ

25 papers: 12 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · VacciniumPositive and negative results

17 papers: 10 positive, 7 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · growth · VacciniumPositive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.